Randomized Controlled Trial of Biofeedback Therapy for Dyssynergic Defecation

NCT ID: NCT00257842

Last Updated: 2014-09-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Constipation is a common disorder and current treatments are unsatisfactory. Biofeedback may help patients with constipation and dyssynergic defecation, but its efficacy is unproven and whether this is due to behavioral modification or excessive attention is unknown. Methods: In a prospective randomized trial, the investigators investigated the efficacy of Biofeedback (manometric- assisted anal relaxation, muscle coordination and simulated defecation training), with either sham feedback therapy (Sham) or standard therapy (diet, exercise, laxatives; Standard) in 77 subjects (69 women) with dyssynergic defecation. Primary outcome measures included presence of dyssynergia, balloon expulsion time, number of complete spontaneous bowel movements (CSBM), and global bowel satisfaction. Data analyzed per protocol.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Dyssynergia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Standard treatment, sham feedback and biofeedback therapy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:Patients were included if they fulfilled Rome II criteria for functional constipation, and during attempted defecation demonstrated a dyssynergic pattern of defecation, and either had prolonged difficulty with expelling a simulated stool (\> 1 minute) or prolonged delay (\> 20% marker retention) in colonic transit.

Exclusion Criteria: They were required to have no evidence of structural or metabolic diseases that could cause constipation, as assessed by colonoscopy/barium enema and routine hematological, biochemical and thyroid function tests. Patients taking drugs known to be constipating, for example opioids were either excluded or were asked to discontinue the drug prior to enrollment. Other exclusion criteria included: severe cardiac or renal disease, previous gastrointestinal, spinal or pelvic surgery except cholecystectomy, hysterectomy or appendectomy, neurologic diseases such as multiple sclerosis, stroke or spinal injury, impaired cognizance (mini-mental score \< 15), legal blindness, pregnancy, rectal prolapse, anal fissure, and alternating constipation and diarrhea.
Minimum Eligible Age

15 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Augusta University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Satish Rao

pi

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Satish SC Rao, MD, PhD.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Iowa

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Iowa

Iowa City, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

R01DK057100-05

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: org_study_id

View Link

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.