The Role of Rotator Interval Closure in Bankart Lesion Repair

NCT ID: NCT01620619

Last Updated: 2014-04-25

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

142 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The null hypothesis is that there is no statistical difference between the two treatment groups for any outcome. The investigators suspect that patients who undergo a Bankart lesion repair with rotator interval closure will have lower quality of life and less external rotation compared to patients who undergo a Bankart lesion repair alone. No difference will be observed for recurrence rate between the two treatment groups

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Research assessing the role and effectiveness of rotator interval closure is important to attempt to determine the most beneficial and efficient treatment for Bankart lesions and anterior shoulder instability. To date there is only weak evidence supporting the superiority of Bankart lesion repair in addition to rotator interval closure compared to Bankart lesion repair alone.

Does Bankart lesion repair with rotator interval closure result in differences in quality of life, range of motion and recurrence at 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years in similar patients with Bankart lesions who are treated with Bankart lesion repair alone?

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Bankart Lesions Anterior Shoulder Instability

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Arthroscopic Bankart Repair & Rotator Interval Closure

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Closure of rotator interval

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Usual arthroscopic Bankart repair plus rotator cuff interval closure

Arthoscopic Bankart Repair alone

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Arthroscopic Bankart Repair alone

Intervention Type OTHER

Usual arthroscopic Bankart repair

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Arthroscopic Bankart Repair alone

Usual arthroscopic Bankart repair

Intervention Type OTHER

Closure of rotator interval

Usual arthroscopic Bankart repair plus rotator cuff interval closure

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients between the ages of 15 to 50 years
* At least one episode of demonstrated dislocation
* Bankart lesion of the anterior glenoid labrum
* Absence of other capsular and tendon injuries
* Absence of glenoid fractures or divots

Exclusion Criteria

* Posterior instability or the need for posterior surgical reconstruction
* Significant bone lesions greater than 3mm of the humeral head anterior-to- posterior (Hill-Sachs lesions)
* Presence of other pathologic conditions of the shoulder (excluding SLAP lesions)
Minimum Eligible Age

15 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

51 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Western Ontario, Canada

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dianne Bryant

Associate Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Dianne Bryant, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

The University of Western Ontario

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

London Health Sciences Centre - Unviersity Hospital

London, Ontario, Canada

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Dianne Bryant, PhD

Role: CONTACT

5196612111 ext. 83947

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

FKSMC 2010 - 4

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Results of Rotator Cuff Repair
NCT01549912 COMPLETED