Red Blood Cell Transfusion Improves Perfusion Parameters in Septic Shock Patients With Hypoperfusion

NCT ID: NCT01611753

Last Updated: 2012-06-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

46 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2004-04-30

Study Completion Date

2008-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the immediate effects of red blood cells transfusion on central venous oxygen saturation and lactate levels in septic shock patients randomized to two different hemoglobin levels.

The influence of red blood cell (RBC) transfusion on the adequacy of oxygen delivery (DO2) and supply (VO2) could be assessed by systemic oxygen variables such as central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2) and lactate levels. Although it is not clear that alterations in these parameters actually represent an improvement in the DO2/VO2 ratio, they might represent a better transfusion trigger than the absolute hemoglobin value.

Patients admitted with a diagnosis of septic shock and hemoglobin levels lower than 9.0 g/dL , less than 48 hours of shock diagnosis, were included, a central venous catheter in the superior vena cava and signed informed consent. The investigators randomized all patients into two groups. Patients in the liberal group received transfusions immediately, as the objective was to maintain hemoglobin levels above 9.0 g/dL. In the restrictive group, transfusion was withheld until their hemoglobin levels fell below 7.0 g/dL.

Each time a patient received a transfusion, the investigators collected a set of laboratory tests, including hemoglobin levels, ScvO2 and lactate, at two time points, immediately before transfusion and one hour after its ending.

The sample size was calculated by considering that in 80% of the transfusions in patients in the restrictive group ScvO2 would improve compared to only 45% of those in the liberal group, with an alpha error of 0.05 and 80% power. Improvement was defined as an increase of 5% over the pre-transfusion ScvO2. Twenty-eight transfusions in each group would be necessary, but to correct for potential non-parametric distribution of the main variables, the number was adjusted to 35 transfusions in each group.

Trends in ScvO2 and lactate were categorized as worsening or improving. The investigators defined improvement when ScvO2 reached 70% in patients with baseline levels below this threshold or when there was an absolute increase of at least 5% after transfusion. Any increase in patients with previous ScvO2 ≥ 70% was considered to be "no change". Worsening was defined as a reduction of 5% in the previous levels or a decline to less than 70% in patients with pre-transfusion levels in the range of 70 to 75%. The investigators also carried out a ROC curve analysis to assess the accuracy of the pre-transfusion hemoglobin levels, pre-transfusion lactate and pre-transfusion ScvO2 in predicting the patients whose ScvO2 would increase more than 5% with transfusion. For this analysis, the investigators used a different approach because it would also be necessary to analyze patients with a lower chance of response to assess the prediction of response. Thus, this analysis included all patients with ScvO2 below 75%, rather than only those below 70%. As before, the investigators defined improvement as any increase ≥ 5%. The investigators did not consider patients with levels above 75% in this analysis, as the physiological interpretation of this situation is challenging. The investigators considered as altered any lactate levels above 1.5 times the reference level, and a change ≥ 10% was defined as improvement or worsening. In patients with baseline normal levels, the status was recorded as worsening if a 10% increase was detected. Afterwards, the investigators tested the association between these categorized variables and the baseline levels of hemoglobin. The impact on perfusion was also assessed by the determination of Δlactate (lactate post-transfusion x 100/lactate pre-transfusion) and ΔScvO2 (ScvO2 post-transfusion x 100/ScvO2 pre-transfusion), and their correlation with the baseline hemoglobin levels was analyzed using the Spearman correlation test.

In all tests, the results were considered significant if the p level was lower than 0.05.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Septic Shock

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

liberal group

Patients in the liberal group received transfusions immediately, as the objective was to maintain hemoglobin levels above 9.0 g/dL.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

packed red blood cell transfusion

Intervention Type OTHER

Patients wil be randomized en two groups, in the liberal group they must received transfusions immediately, as the objective was to maintain hemoglobin levels above 9.0 g/dL. In the restrictive group they will receive transfusion to maintain hemoglobin levels above 7.0g/dL

restrictive group

Patients in the liberal group received transfusions immediately, as the objective was to maintain hemoglobin levels above 7.0 g/dL.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

packed red blood cell transfusion

Intervention Type OTHER

Patients wil be randomized en two groups, in the liberal group they must received transfusions immediately, as the objective was to maintain hemoglobin levels above 9.0 g/dL. In the restrictive group they will receive transfusion to maintain hemoglobin levels above 7.0g/dL

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

packed red blood cell transfusion

Patients wil be randomized en two groups, in the liberal group they must received transfusions immediately, as the objective was to maintain hemoglobin levels above 9.0 g/dL. In the restrictive group they will receive transfusion to maintain hemoglobin levels above 7.0g/dL

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* age over 18 years old
* less than 48 hours of shock diagnosis
* hemoglobin levels lower than 9.0 g/dL
* a central venous catheter in the superior vena cava

Exclusion Criteria

* pregnancy
* known coronary disease
* active bleeding
* previous participation in the study.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Bruno Franco Mazza

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Bruno Franco Mazza

MD

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hospital Sao Paulo - Universitary hospital of Sao Paulo Federal University

São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Brazil

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Mazza BF, Freitas FG, Barros MM, Azevedo LC, Machado FR. Blood transfusions in septic shock: is 7.0 g/dL really the appropriate threshold? Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2015 Jan-Mar;27(1):36-43. doi: 10.5935/0103-507X.20150007. Epub 2015 Mar 1.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 25909311 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1177/04

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Lactate Kinetics in Septic Shock
NCT05349370 RECRUITING NA
Septic Shock em Steroids
NCT01047670 UNKNOWN PHASE2/PHASE3