Strategy of Early Improvement of Tissue Oxygenation Decrease the Mortality of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock

NCT ID: NCT01310790

Last Updated: 2011-03-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

420 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-10-31

Study Completion Date

2009-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The impact of lactate guided therapy on septic shock has not been extensively investigated, however the goal directed therapy has been used for years. The investigators aim was to test the hypothesis that lactate directed hemodynamic therapy is associated with improving the outcome of patients with septic shock by comparing different goal directed strategies which have been commonly recommended clinically.

In this multicenter, randomized trial, the investigators assigned patients with septic shock to three groups: Patients were treated with hemodynamic therapy directed either by conventional parameters treatment (control group), or central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2), or blood lactate respectively in each group. The primary outcome was the rate of death at 28 days after randomization and in-hospital mortality; secondary end points include hemodynamic states, time to goal-achievement.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This prospective, randomized, controlled and multi-center study was performed in 6 closed intensive care units (ICU) of academic tertiary hospitals. Adult patients with septic shock admitted to the hospitals from 2005 to 2008 were assigned to the study eligibility. Eligible patients were centrally randomized using sealed envelopes into one of the three groups which included lactate, ScvO2, and control groups. The criteria of septic shock included two of four criteria for the systemic inflammatory response syndrome and systolic blood pressure lower than 90 mmHg or decrease of systolic blood pressure more than 40 mmHg after fluid challenge and the clinical signs of tissue hypoperfusion, including oliguria, blood lactate concentration of 4 mmol/L or more and consciousness alteration. The patients were excluded if they meet any one of follows: an age of less than 18 years, pregnancy, an acute cerebral vascular event (Glasgow coma score \< 5), acute myocardial infarction or acute coronary syndrome, massive pulmonary embolism, status asthmaticus, a primary diagnosed cardiac dysrhythmias, contraindication to central venous catheterization, active gastrointestinal hemorrhage, massive intraabdominal infective focus without drainage, severe bronchopleural fistula, seizure, during chemotherapy or immunosuppressive therapy, or end stage of the diseases.

The protocol was approved by Institutional Ethics Committee. The informed consents were obtained from all patients or their legally authorized next of kin. The patients or their legal surrogate decision makers were informed of their right to refuse the study procedures at any time during the protocols were performed.

The case report forms (CRF) were sent to each site from the principal investigator with the protocols, which were randomly sealed in a serial of envelopes. After patients' enrollment, the CRFs were filled by the attending physicians at each site according to the protocol of each group. End points were 28-day mortality and in-hospital mortality until 90 days. The demographic data, acute physiological and chronic evaluation score (APACHE) II and other data from patients' basic condition were recorded at enrollment day. The protocol related data were collected at baseline and each hour for 6 hours and then at 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72 hours. The ICU and hospital length of stay were also noted and patients were followed up to day 28 and discharge from hospital for mortality. The protocol implementation and data collection stopped when patients or their families wished to withdraw from the program or refuse further treatment or a patient's death.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Shock, Septic

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

lactate group:lactate acide clearance directed group; ScvO2 group:ScvO2 directed group;control group

Patients assigned to lactate group started with the resuscitation to achieve a CVP of 8 to 12 mmHg and MAP 65 to 90 mmHg. Then if ScvO2 was less than 70 percent, red cells were transfused to achieve a hematocrit of at least 30 percent. After the CVP, MAP, and hematocrit achieved the goals, dobutamine was given until the ScvO2 was 70 percent or higher. Arterial blood lactate concentration was obtained at 6 hours and try to achieve lactate clearance was \>30%.

Patients in the ScvO2 group received the treatment as ScvO2 directed therapy protocol for at least 6 hours and maintained for 72 hours. The protocol was the same as that of lactated directed therapy with the exception of blood lactate concentration testing.

Patients in the control group received the treatment as the same protocol for maintaining CVP and MAP in that of lactated directed therapy. ScvO2 and arterial blood lactated concentration were not necessary to obtain.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* severe sepsis and septic shock patients

Exclusion Criteria

* \<18 years old;
* pregnant woman;
* AMI;
* cerebral hemorrhage;
* contraindication for S-G catheter
* Brainstem death
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Chinese Septic Shock Network

NETWORK

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Peking Union Medical College Hospital

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Dawei Liu, M.D

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Peking Union Medical College Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Critical Care Department, Peking Union Medical Hospital

Beijing, , China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CSSN-6091-DaweiLiu

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Lactate Kinetics in Septic Shock
NCT05349370 RECRUITING NA