Transfusion-requirements in Septic Shock Trial

NCT ID: NCT01485315

Last Updated: 2014-10-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

1005 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-11-30

Study Completion Date

2014-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Patients with blood poisoning - sepsis - often receive blood transfusions in the intensive care unit. The evidence that blood transfusion leads to improved outcome is limited and the blood may be harmful to some of these patients. To bridge the gap between clinical practice and evidence, a large randomised clinical trial is needed to document the efficacy and safety of RBC transfusion in these very sick patients

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background Septic patients often receive red blood cell (RBC) transfusions in the intensive care unit. The evidence that RBC transfusion leads to improved outcome is limited and the intervention may be harmful to some of these patients. In contrast, current guidelines recommend restrictive transfusion of RBC for critical ill patients without septic shock. To bridge the gap between clinical practice and evidence, a large randomised clinical trial is needed to document the efficacy and safety of RBC transfusion in patients with septic shock

Design Pragmatic, multicenter, randomised, outcome assessment-blinded trial of patients with septic shock to RBC transfusion at haemoglobin (Hb) transfusion trigger of 7 g/dl (4.4 mM) or 9 g/dl (5.6 mM), stratified by the presence of haematological malignancy and centre.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria:

To increase the validity of the trial inclusion criteria will be broad with few exclusions

Outcome measures The outcome measures will mainly be patient-important but ICU- and hospital length of stay will also be assessed

Trial size 2 x 500 patients will be needed to show a 9% absolute risk difference in 90-day mortality (baseline mortality of 45%, relative risk reduction 20% (from septic patients in the TRICC trial), alpha of 0.05 (two-sided) and a beta of 0.20 that is a power of 80% (1-beta).

An interim-analysis will be performed after 500 patients. The Data Safety and Monitoring Board (DMSC) will recommend that the trial is stopped if a group-difference in 90-day mortality with p\<0.001.

Time Line The first patient is expected to be randomised December 1st 2011 and the trial database is expected to be closed early 2014. The main manuscript will be submitted shortly thereafter.

Funding The trial is publicly funded by the Danish Strategic Research Council

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Septic Shock

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Liberal blood transfusion

Blood transfusion at haemoglobin 9.0 g/dl (5.6 mM) or less

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

SAGM (Saline-Adenine-Glucose-Mannitol) blood transfusion

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

One unit prestorage, leuko-depleted SAGM blood at haemoglobin at 9.0 g/dl (5.6 mM) or less at point-of-care testing

Restrictive blood transfusion

Blood transfusion at haemoglobin 7.0 g/dl (4.3 mM) or less

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

SAGM (Saline-Adenine-Glucose-Mannitol) blood transfusion

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

One unit prestorage, leuko-depleted SAGM blood at haemoglobin 7.0 g/dl (4.3 mM) or less at point-of-care testing

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

SAGM (Saline-Adenine-Glucose-Mannitol) blood transfusion

One unit prestorage, leuko-depleted SAGM blood at haemoglobin at 9.0 g/dl (5.6 mM) or less at point-of-care testing

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

SAGM (Saline-Adenine-Glucose-Mannitol) blood transfusion

One unit prestorage, leuko-depleted SAGM blood at haemoglobin 7.0 g/dl (4.3 mM) or less at point-of-care testing

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Liberal red blood cell (RBC) transfusion Restrictive red blood cell (RBC) transfusion

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patient in the ICU AND
* Fulfil the criteria for septic shock AND
* Have haemoglobin of 9.0 g/dl (5.6 mM) or less AND
* Consent obtainable from patient or proxy or national law allows delayed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Documented wish against transfusion OR
* Previous serious adverse reaction with blood product OR
* Acute coronary syndrome OR
* Life-threatening bleeding OR
* RBC transfusion during current ICU admission OR
* Withdrawal from active therapy or brain death OR
* Lack of informed consent (depending on national law) OR
* Acute burn injury regardless of degree and burn surface area
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Copenhagen Trial Unit, Center for Clinical Intervention Research

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Rigshospitalet, Denmark

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Copenhagen

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Scandinavian Critical Care Trials Group

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Anders Perner

Principle Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Anders Perner, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Dept. of Intensive Care, Rigshospitalet / SCCTG

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Ålborg University Hospital

Aalborg, , Denmark

Site Status

Aarhus University Hospital, NBG

Aarhus, , Denmark

Site Status

Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby

Aarhus, , Denmark

Site Status

Bispebjerg Hospital

Copenhagen, , Denmark

Site Status

Glostrup Hospital

Copenhagen, , Denmark

Site Status

Hvidovre Hospital

Copenhagen, , Denmark

Site Status

Rigshospitalet

Copenhagen, , Denmark

Site Status

Gentofte Hospital

Gentofte Municipality, , Denmark

Site Status

Herning Hospital

Herning, , Denmark

Site Status

Hjørring Hospital

Hjørring, , Denmark

Site Status

Holbæk Hospital

Holbæk, , Denmark

Site Status

Horsens Hospital

Horsens, , Denmark

Site Status

Kolding Hospital

Kolding, , Denmark

Site Status

Køge Hospital

Køge, , Denmark

Site Status

Næstved Hospital

Næstved, , Denmark

Site Status

Randers Hospital

Randers, , Denmark

Site Status

Slagelse Hospital

Slagelse, , Denmark

Site Status

Sønderborg Hospital

Sønderborg, , Denmark

Site Status

Vejle Hospital

Vejle, , Denmark

Site Status

Helsinki University Hospital

Helsinki, , Finland

Site Status

Joensuu Hospital

Joensuu, , Finland

Site Status

Tampere University Hospital

Tampere, , Finland

Site Status

Ålesund Hospital

Ålesund, , Norway

Site Status

Haukeland University Hospital

Bergen, , Norway

Site Status

Akershus University Hospital

Oslo, , Norway

Site Status

Stavanger University Hospital

Stavanger, , Norway

Site Status

Halmstad Hospital

Halmstad, , Sweden

Site Status

Helsingborg Hospital

Helsingborg, , Sweden

Site Status

Karolinska Hospital, Huddinge

Stockholm, , Sweden

Site Status

Karolinska Institutet Solna

Stockholm, , Sweden

Site Status

Södersjukhuset

Stockholm, , Sweden

Site Status

Växjö Hospital

Vaxjo, , Sweden

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Denmark Finland Norway Sweden

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Holst LB, Haase N, Wetterslev J, Wernerman J, Aneman A, Guttormsen AB, Johansson PI, Karlsson S, Klemenzson G, Winding R, Nebrich L, Albeck C, Vang ML, Bulow HH, Elkjaer JM, Nielsen JS, Kirkegaard P, Nibro H, Lindhardt A, Strange D, Thormar K, Poulsen LM, Berezowicz P, Badstolokken PM, Strand K, Cronhjort M, Haunstrup E, Rian O, Oldner A, Bendtsen A, Iversen S, Langva JA, Johansen RB, Nielsen N, Pettila V, Reinikainen M, Keld D, Leivdal S, Breider JM, Tjader I, Reiter N, Gottrup U, White J, Wiis J, Andersen LH, Steensen M, Perner A. Transfusion requirements in septic shock (TRISS) trial - comparing the effects and safety of liberal versus restrictive red blood cell transfusion in septic shock patients in the ICU: protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2013 May 23;14:150. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-150.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23702006 (View on PubMed)

Holst LB, Haase N, Wetterslev J, Wernerman J, Guttormsen AB, Karlsson S, Johansson PI, Aneman A, Vang ML, Winding R, Nebrich L, Nibro HL, Rasmussen BS, Lauridsen JR, Nielsen JS, Oldner A, Pettila V, Cronhjort MB, Andersen LH, Pedersen UG, Reiter N, Wiis J, White JO, Russell L, Thornberg KJ, Hjortrup PB, Muller RG, Moller MH, Steensen M, Tjader I, Kilsand K, Odeberg-Wernerman S, Sjobo B, Bundgaard H, Thyo MA, Lodahl D, Maerkedahl R, Albeck C, Illum D, Kruse M, Winkel P, Perner A; TRISS Trial Group; Scandinavian Critical Care Trials Group. Lower versus higher hemoglobin threshold for transfusion in septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2014 Oct 9;371(15):1381-91. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1406617. Epub 2014 Oct 1.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 25270275 (View on PubMed)

Carson JL, Stanworth SJ, Dennis JA, Fergusson DA, Pagano MB, Roubinian NH, Turgeon AF, Valentine S, Trivella M, Doree C, Hebert PC. Transfusion thresholds and other strategies for guiding red blood cell transfusion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Oct 20;10:CD002042. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002042.pub6.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 41114449 (View on PubMed)

Carson JL, Stanworth SJ, Dennis JA, Trivella M, Roubinian N, Fergusson DA, Triulzi D, Doree C, Hebert PC. Transfusion thresholds for guiding red blood cell transfusion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Dec 21;12(12):CD002042. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002042.pub5.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34932836 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

H-3-2011-114

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.