Study 33: Adherence to Latent Tuberculosis Infection Treatment 3HP SAT Versus 3HP DOT
NCT ID: NCT01582711
Last Updated: 2025-03-13
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
1002 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-09-30
2014-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
* To compare the treatment completion rates between participants randomized to SAT without reminders versus SAT with weekly SMS reminders
* To evaluate the timing of doses and patterns of adherence to once weekly RPT/INH among participants who complete treatment and those who discontinue therapy prior to completion.
* To determine the availability and acceptability of using SMS reminders among all patients consenting to participate in the study.
* To determine the toxicity and tolerability by comparing the rates of any drug-related grade 3 or 4 adverse events or death between the DOT arm and the SAT arms (both combined and individually)
* To compare the frequency, timing, and causes for failure to complete treatment between the DOT arm and the SAT arms
* To collect patient-specific cost data related to the 3 treatment arms
* To describe the pattern of antituberculosis drug resistance among Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains cultured from participants who develop active TB.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Three Months of Weekly Rifapentine and Isoniazid for M. Tuberculosis Infection
NCT00023452
Assessment of the Safety, Tolerability, and Effectiveness of Rifapentine Given Daily for LTBI
NCT03474029
VDOT for Monitoring Adherence to LTBI Treatment
NCT02641106
TBTC Study 31: Rifapentine-containing Tuberculosis Treatment Shortening Regimens
NCT02410772
TBTC Study 22: Efficacy of Once-Weekly Rifapentine and Isoniazid in Treatment of Tuberculosis
NCT00023335
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Candidates for LTBI treatment are those persons with a positive TST or IGRA, particularly if they also have risk factors for progressing to active TB, including individuals likely to be recently infected. The Prevent TB Study (TBTC Study 26) was an open-label, randomized, phase III controlled clinical trial with over 8,000 high risk TST reactors enrolled. The study compared rifapentine and INH (3RPT/INH) given once-weekly by directly observed treatment (DOT) for 3 months (12 doses) compared with 9 months of daily, self-administered INH. The results demonstrated the safety and efficacy of the shorter regimen. Moreover, the once weekly therapy had significantly higher treatment completion rates than the standard 9 INH regimen.
One of the most effective strategies for assuring adherence with therapy is to have each dose of medication directly administered by a health care worker who observes and records the ingestion of the drugs. DOT for active TB has been successfully used in many settings to improve treatment completion, however cost and logistical constraints of DOT remain. The estimated cost of giving 12 weekly DOT doses to all LTBI patients is likely prohibitive for TB control programs worldwide. This may lead to a decreased uptake of the new regimen or implementation using SAT where adherence has not been studied. Therefore, to apply the Prevent TB study results more broadly, a new study evaluating treatment completion of 3 RPT/INH given as SAT is conducted.
Medication adherence is defined by whether patients take a treatment as prescribed. The effectiveness of any treatment is determined largely by adherence. In clinical practice and research, indirect measures of adherence are commonly used. Indirect measures of adherence include patient self-report, evaluation of pharmacy dispensation records, pill counts, and the use of electronic prescription bottle monitors. Patient self-reported adherence is accurate when non-adherence is reported but tends to overestimate true adherence. Self-report is not discerning enough to be utilized as a sole measure of adherence in research settings where adherence is the primary outcome. Pill counts have been utilized successfully in research and clinical settings for real-time assessment but also tend to overestimate adherence. Electronic drug monitors such as the Medication Event Monitoring System (MEMS) are the best available tools to assess the timing and patterns of adherence. This study uses a combination of indirect measures including MEMS, pill counts, and self-report to provide the most accurate assessment of adherence to once weekly, self-administered RPT/INH.
The number of cellular phone users globally has increased dramatically in the last decade. Cell phones and SMS reminders have been used successfully in randomized controlled clinical trials to improve adherence to vaccines, HIV medications, and asthma treatment. SMS appear to be cost-effective ways to reach patients in remote locations. This study examines effect of SMS on medication adherence.
The goal of this open label clinical trial is to compare the adherence to 3RPT/INH given by DOT versus SAT or SAT with a weekly SMS reminder. The primary assessment of adherence will be treatment completion which is defined as taking at least 90% of the doses (11/12 doses of each drug) within 16 weeks of initiation. Secondary objectives include evaluating the patterns of adherence in participants who fail to complete, determining the feasibility and impact of using SMS reminders on treatment completion with SAT, evaluating the tolerability and any adverse events associated with each treatment arm, monitoring for the development of active TB, determining the drug susceptibility for participants who develop active TB, and measuring important patient-related expenditures associated with each study arm. The trial will be conducted in patients diagnosed with LTBI and recommended for treatment.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
3HP Directly Observed Therapy (DOT)
900mg of isoniazid plus 900mg of rifapentine given weekly for 3 months (12 weeks, 12 doses) under Directly Observed Therapy (DOT)
isoniazid and rifapentine
rifapentine (PRIFTIN, RPT) 900 mg and isoniazid (INH) 900mg, once-weekly, for 12 weeks (12 doses)
3HP Self Administered Therapy (SAT)
900mg of isoniazid plus 900mg of rifapentine given weekly for 3 months (12 weeks, 12 doses) as patient Self Administered Therapy (SAT)
Self Administered Therapy (SAT)
Self Administered Therapy (SAT)
isoniazid and rifapentine
rifapentine (PRIFTIN, RPT) 900 mg and isoniazid (INH) 900mg, once-weekly, for 12 weeks (12 doses)
3HP SAT with SMS Reminders
900mg of isoniazid plus 900mg of rifapentine given weekly for 3 months (12 weeks, 12 doses) as patient Self Administered Therapy (SAT). In addition, patient receives phone Short Message Service (SMS) reminders weekly.
Self Administered Therapy (SAT)
Self Administered Therapy (SAT)
SMS reminders
Short Message Service (SMS) text reminders
isoniazid and rifapentine
rifapentine (PRIFTIN, RPT) 900 mg and isoniazid (INH) 900mg, once-weekly, for 12 weeks (12 doses)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Self Administered Therapy (SAT)
Self Administered Therapy (SAT)
SMS reminders
Short Message Service (SMS) text reminders
isoniazid and rifapentine
rifapentine (PRIFTIN, RPT) 900 mg and isoniazid (INH) 900mg, once-weekly, for 12 weeks (12 doses)
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age \> 18 years
* Weight \> 45kg and considered appropriate to receive RPT 900mg and INH 900mg once weekly by the local site investigator
* Willingness to provide signed informed consent.
* Clinical indication for LTBI treatment such as: 1) persons with a positive tuberculin skin test (TST) as defined by CDC criteria or a positive interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA) defined per the manufacturers' guidelines AND one of the following: close contact to someone with culture confirmed TB, HIV infection, or \> 2 cm2 of pulmonary parenchymal fibrosis on chest X-ray and no prior history of TB treatment; 2) TST or IGRA converters defined as a documented change from negative to positive within a two-year period; 3) Persons with any other clinical indication for LTBI treatment as locally defined including persons with a negative TST and/or IGRA (e.g. HIV-infected close contacts to an active pulmonary TB cases)
Exclusion Criteria
* Contacts to a source case with known resistance to isoniazid or rifampin
* Persons with a history (by written documentation or self-report) of ever receiving \> 1 week of treatment for active or latent TB, regardless of whether the course was completed, because adherence may be different in people who previously took TB treatment
* Persons who are not considered candidates for SAT by the local investigator
* History of sensitivity or intolerance to isoniazid or rifamycins
* Serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT, SGPT) \> 5x upper limit of normal among persons in whom an ALT is determined
* Persons with HIV-infection who 1) have a CD4 \< 350 or 2) are currently receiving or planning to receive antiretroviral therapy in the first 120 days after study initiation (e.g., HIV-1 protease inhibitors, nucleoside or non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, CCR5 inhibitors or integrase inhibitors)
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
FED
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Andrey S Borisov, MD, MPH
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, USA.
Robert Belknap, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Colorado, Denver, USA.
Robert Belknap, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Colorado, Denver, USA.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of California, San Francisco
San Francisco, California, United States
Denver Public Health Department
Denver, Colorado, United States
Washington DC Veterans Affairs Medical Center
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons and New York City Department of Health
New York, New York, United States
Duke University
Durham, North Carolina, United States
Vanderbilt University Medical Center and Nashville Metro Public Health Department
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
University of North Texas Health Science Center at Fort Worth
Fort Worth, Texas, United States
Audie L. Murphy VA Hospital
San Antonio, Texas, United States
South Texas - Department of State Health Services
San Antonio, Texas, United States
TB and Chest service of Hong Kong
Hong Kong, , China
Wits Health Consortium
Soweto, , South Africa
Agencia de Salut Publica - Barcelona, Spain and UNTHSC
Barcelona, , Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Sterling TR, Villarino ME, Borisov AS, Shang N, Gordin F, Bliven-Sizemore E, Hackman J, Hamilton CD, Menzies D, Kerrigan A, Weis SE, Weiner M, Wing D, Conde MB, Bozeman L, Horsburgh CR Jr, Chaisson RE; TB Trials Consortium PREVENT TB Study Team. Three months of rifapentine and isoniazid for latent tuberculosis infection. N Engl J Med. 2011 Dec 8;365(23):2155-66. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1104875.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Recommendations for use of an isoniazid-rifapentine regimen with direct observation to treat latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011 Dec 9;60(48):1650-3.
Shepardson D, Marks SM, Chesson H, Kerrigan A, Holland DP, Scott N, Tian X, Borisov AS, Shang N, Heilig CM, Sterling TR, Villarino ME, Mac Kenzie WR. Cost-effectiveness of a 12-dose regimen for treating latent tuberculous infection in the United States. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2013 Dec;17(12):1531-7. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.13.0423.
Sterling TR, Moro RN, Borisov AS, Phillips E, Shepherd G, Adkinson NF, Weis S, Ho C, Villarino ME; Tuberculosis Trials Consortium. Flu-like and Other Systemic Drug Reactions Among Persons Receiving Weekly Rifapentine Plus Isoniazid or Daily Isoniazid for Treatment of Latent Tuberculosis Infection in the PREVENT Tuberculosis Study. Clin Infect Dis. 2015 Aug 15;61(4):527-35. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ323. Epub 2015 Apr 22.
Sadowski C, Belknap R, Holland DP, Moro RN, Chen MP, Wright A, Millet JP, Cayla JA, Scott NA, Borisov A, Gandhi NR. Symptoms and Systemic Drug Reactions in Persons Receiving Weekly Rifapentine Plus Isoniazid (3HP) Treatment for Latent Tuberculosis Infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2023 Jun 16;76(12):2090-2097. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciad083.
Moro RN, Scott NA, Vernon A, Tepper NK, Goldberg SV, Schwartzman K, Leung CC, Schluger NW, Belknap RW, Chaisson RE, Narita M, Machado ES, Lopez M, Sanchez J, Villarino ME, Sterling TR. Exposure to Latent Tuberculosis Treatment during Pregnancy. The PREVENT TB and the iAdhere Trials. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2018 May;15(5):570-580. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201704-326OC.
Belknap R, Holland D, Feng PJ, Millet JP, Cayla JA, Martinson NA, Wright A, Chen MP, Moro RN, Scott NA, Arevalo B, Miro JM, Villarino ME, Weiner M, Borisov AS; TB Trials Consortium iAdhere Study Team. Self-administered Versus Directly Observed Once-Weekly Isoniazid and Rifapentine Treatment of Latent Tuberculosis Infection: A Randomized Trial. Ann Intern Med. 2017 Nov 21;167(10):689-697. doi: 10.7326/M17-1150. Epub 2017 Nov 7.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Home page of the Tuberculosis Trials Consortium (TBTC) funded by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
TBTC Study 33
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
CDC-NCHHSTP 6222
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.