TOward the Lowest Effective DOse of Abatacept or Tocilizumab
NCT ID: NCT01557374
Last Updated: 2021-01-26
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
232 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-04-30
2019-11-08
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
As the expected result, this study is aimed to test the feasibility of a step down strategy on 2 biological agents, Abatacept and Tocilizumab, in RA patients in remission.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Abatacept vs Tocilizumab for the Treatment of RA in TNF Alpha Inhibitor Inadequate Responders
NCT03227419
Rotation or Change of Biotherapy After First Anti-TNF Treatment Failure for Rheumatoid Arthritis
NCT01000441
Real-world Clinical Efficacy of Abatacept in the T3 Data Registry
NCT01555879
Impact and Use of Abatacept IV for Rheumatoid Arthritis in Real Life Setting
NCT02037737
Study of Abatacept Versus Placebo to Assess the Prevention of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) in Adult Patients
NCT00124449
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Nevertheless, we do not dispose considerable data on the risks of relapse or structural progression during such a step down strategy. A few studies on anti-TNF agents have shown the possibility of such therapy reduction. A national study, " STRASS ", coordinated by Bruno FAUTREL, has evaluated the possibility of spacing then stopping the injections of anti-TNF(s). To date, no data concerning Abatacept or Tocilizumab has been published.
This is a Non inferiority, prospective, randomized, controlled study with PROBE (Prospective Randomized, Open Blinded Evaluation) evaluating method.
The objectives of this study are:
* For patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) in remission under Abatacept or Tocilizumab, to evaluate in terms of disease activity within a 2 years period, the impact of a progressive decreasing biotherapy strategy (by progressively spacing the injections) in comparison with usual treatment (maintaining the usual dose and injection frequency of the biotherapeutic agent).
* To evaluate the impact of such decreasing strategy in terms of RA relapses and structural progression in 1 and 2 years.
* To determine the cost-effectiveness ratio of decreasing in comparison with maintaining the biological treatments.
Inclusion criteria:
Patients with RA, defined by ACR-EULAR 2010 criteria:
* Treated for at least 1 year with Abatacept or Tocilizumab with market authorized doses\*, and possibly with a DMARD and ≤ 5 mg per day of corticoids.
* In remission for at least 6 months according to ACR/ EULAR 2010 remission criteria or a DAS 28 ≤ 2.6\*\*
Patients are divided into 2 groups:
1. Maintaining strategy: to maintain the biological treatment and possibly the associated DMARD and corticoids.
2. Decreasing strategy: to decrease progressively the biological agent via progressively increasing the injection intervals, following a predetermined pattern, established according to the RA activity level, during each trimestrial visit.
The primary judgment criterion is: RA activity in a 2 years period of time, measured by repeated DAS44.
The secondary judgment criteria are:
* Percentage of relapse in 1 and 2 years.
* Radiographic structural progression in 1 and 2 years.
* Cost-effectiveness ratio difference between the 2 strategies in 2 years.
As the expected result, this study is aimed to test the feasibility of a step down strategy on 2 biological agents, Abatacept and Tocilizumab, in RA patients in remission.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Maintenance Tocilizumab, Abatacept
No modification in biotherapy dose and administration frequency
Tocilizumab, Abatacept
Tocilizumab: Roactemra 4-8 mg/kg/month and 162 mg/week Abatacept: Orencia 500-1000 mg/month and 125 mg/week
Decrease Tocilizumab, Abatacept
Progressive decrease by predetermined pattern. Progressive injection interval increase (by stage)
Decrease Tocilizumab, Abatacept
The decrease pattern is established on 4 consecutive stages :
IV Abatacept (500-1000 mg/month) and Tocilizumab(4-8 mg/kg/month):
Stage 0 : Perfusion /30 days Stage 1 :Perfusion/45 days Stage 2 :Perfusion/60 days Stage 3 :Perfusion/90 days Stage 4 :Stop
SC Abatacept (125 mg/week) and Tocilizumab (162 mg/week):
Stage 0 :Injection/7 days Stage 1 :Injection/10 days Stage 2 :Injection/14 days Stage 3 :Injection/21 days Stage 4 :Stop
* If DAS 28 ≤ 2,6 (remission DAS persistent) on trimestrial visit: transfer to next stage for 3 months before next evaluation.
* If DAS 28 \> 2,6 et ≤ 3,2 (weak activity) : maintain ongoing stage
* If DAS 28 \> 3,2 : return to previous stage, (relapse according to European expert consensus)
In the case of relapse while the patient is in stage 0, the therapy modification is left to the investigator's free will, but the patient will be followed till the end of the study.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Tocilizumab, Abatacept
Tocilizumab: Roactemra 4-8 mg/kg/month and 162 mg/week Abatacept: Orencia 500-1000 mg/month and 125 mg/week
Decrease Tocilizumab, Abatacept
The decrease pattern is established on 4 consecutive stages :
IV Abatacept (500-1000 mg/month) and Tocilizumab(4-8 mg/kg/month):
Stage 0 : Perfusion /30 days Stage 1 :Perfusion/45 days Stage 2 :Perfusion/60 days Stage 3 :Perfusion/90 days Stage 4 :Stop
SC Abatacept (125 mg/week) and Tocilizumab (162 mg/week):
Stage 0 :Injection/7 days Stage 1 :Injection/10 days Stage 2 :Injection/14 days Stage 3 :Injection/21 days Stage 4 :Stop
* If DAS 28 ≤ 2,6 (remission DAS persistent) on trimestrial visit: transfer to next stage for 3 months before next evaluation.
* If DAS 28 \> 2,6 et ≤ 3,2 (weak activity) : maintain ongoing stage
* If DAS 28 \> 3,2 : return to previous stage, (relapse according to European expert consensus)
In the case of relapse while the patient is in stage 0, the therapy modification is left to the investigator's free will, but the patient will be followed till the end of the study.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients with RA, defined by ACR-EULAR 2010 criteria
* Treated for at least 1 year with Abatacept or Tocilizumab with market authorized doses\*, and possibly with a DMARD and ≤ 5 mg per day of corticoids.
* In remission since at least 6 months according to ACR/ EULAR 2010 remission criteria or a DAS 28 ≤ 2.6\*\*
* Without destructive structural progression during the previous year on the hand and feet x-rays (judged by the reference rheumatologist)
* Informed on the study and have given their acknowledged written consent to participate in the study.
* Having had a prior medical visit.
* Prescribed dose stability (a spacing related to an infection or a surgery is not a prescribed dose spacing).
* An increase in inflammatory parameters and pain due to an intercurrent event must be distinguished from the RA activity increasing.
Exclusion Criteria
* Surgical intervention programmed for in the next 24 months to come.
* Pregnancy or it's anticipation in the next 24 months to come.
* Non comprehension of French language.
* Non affiliation to social security.
* Patients under legal guardianship.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ministry of Health, France
OTHER_GOV
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Bruno FAUTREL, Pr
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
APHP
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
CHU Pitié Salpêtrière
Paris, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
AOM 11061
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.