Interests of Strengthening Isokinetic Upper Extremity Hemiparetic Sequelae in Patients

NCT ID: NCT01554137

Last Updated: 2016-06-01

Basic Information

• Recruitment Status: TERMINATED
• Clinical Phase: NA
• Total Enrollment: 20 participants
• Study Classification: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Start Date: 2010-10-31
• Study Completion Date: 2015-10-31

Brief Summary

Stroke (CVA) is the leading cause of death and the leading cause of disability in developed countries as in developing countries (WHO, 2000). In the aftermath of a stroke, patients keep a permanent disability in 75% of cases and only one quarter of them is able to resume work. The post stroke sequelae are sensory-motor and cognitive.

According to literature data, 75-83% of patients who survive a stroke learn to walk only 25 to 45% recover use of their upper limb in activities of daily living (Friedman, 1990).

The existence of a phase called "plateau" in motor recovery after stroke has been suggested (Colautti, 2001). This would occur beyond the 4 th month and would correspond to a phase where the rehabilitation techniques used in the subacute phase are deemed less effective. Recently, Page (2004) speculated that this plateau phase is rather the consequence of adaptation to the type of patient follow-up training and not that of a limit to the possibilities of recovery. In an observational study on the recovery of upper limb conducted over a period of 4 years, Broeks (2004) showed a possible recovery beyond 16 weeks post stroke. The results of studies on different techniques for rehabilitation of chronic stroke patients tend to confirm the hypothesis of page. Therefore, varying the training parameters (type, intensity, frequency) could improve the functional capabilities of these patients, even at a distance of stroke.

Strength training is part of the management of hemiparetic patients. The results of several studies show an improvement in muscle strength and functional ability to walk after a building program isokinetic lower limb (Sharp, 1997).

The objective of our project is to evaluate the effectiveness of a building program of isokinetic muscle on the paretic limb motor recovery in hemiparetic patients over 6 months of a stroke.

Conditions

Partial Deficiency of Muscle Strength

Study Design

• Allocation Method: RANDOMIZED
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Blinding Strategy: DOUBLE

Study Groups

With isokinetic strength training

60 minutes isokinetic strength training on concentric mode

Group Type: EXPERIMENTAL

isokinetic strength training

Intervention Type: OTHER

The experimental group will follow a program of 18 sessions (3 sessions per week for 6 weeks) with a physiotherapy treatment (30 minutes) and occupational therapy (30 minutes), and a building session isokinetic concentric mode extensor and flexor muscles of the elbow extensors and wrist flexors.

without isokinetic strength training

passive motion 60 minutes

Group Type: PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

passive motion

Intervention Type: OTHER

The control group will follow a program of 18 sessions of physiotherapy and occupational therapy combined with 18 sessions of passive motion in flexion-elbow extension, wrist flexion-extension on the isokinetic device

Interventions

isokinetic strength training

The experimental group will follow a program of 18 sessions (3 sessions per week for 6 weeks) with a physiotherapy treatment (30 minutes) and occupational therapy (30 minutes), and a building session isokinetic concentric mode extensor and flexor muscles of the elbow extensors and wrist flexors.

Intervention Type: OTHER

passive motion

The control group will follow a program of 18 sessions of physiotherapy and occupational therapy combined with 18 sessions of passive motion in flexion-elbow extension, wrist flexion-extension on the isokinetic device

Intervention Type: OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

• Patients with more than 6 months post stroke,
• Muscular control greater than or equal to 3 on the extensors and elbow flexors,
• Muscular control greater than or equal to 3 on the flexors and extensors of the wrist,
• Spasticity less than or equal to 3 on the muscle groups mentioned above, s
• Active abduction of the shoulder above 60 ° and painless
• Absence of cognitive impairment (MMS> 22 without any trouble phasic)
• No orthopedic limitations at the elbow and wrist,

Exclusion Criteria

• Progressive neurological or systemic involvement,
• Orthopedic limitations at the elbow or wrist
• Cognitive,
• Hemineglect,
• Severe aphasia with impaired comprehension,

• Minimum Eligible Age: 18 Years
• Eligible Sex: ALL
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Sponsors

University Hospital, Montpellier

OTHER

Sponsor Role: lead

Responsible Party

Responsibility Role: SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Flavia COROIAN, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

UH Montpellier

Locations

Service de médecine Physique et de Réadaptation

Montpellier, , France

Countries

France

References

Coroian F, Jourdan C, Bakhti K, Palayer C, Jaussent A, Picot MC, Mottet D, Julia M, Bonnin HY, Laffont I. Upper Limb Isokinetic Strengthening Versus Passive Mobilization in Patients With Chronic Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Feb;99(2):321-328. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.08.490. Epub 2017 Sep 22.

Reference Type: DERIVED

PMID: 28947166 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

8571

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id