LOGIC-Insulin Algorithm-guided Versus Nurse-directed Blood Glucose Control During Critical Illness

NCT ID: NCT01420302

Last Updated: 2024-08-26

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

300 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-08-31

Study Completion Date

2012-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The LOGIC-Insulin computerized software algorithm will be compared with a nurse-directed protocol, both targeting a blood glucose level of 80-110 mg/dL, in critically ill patients

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Critical illness typically causes elevated blood glucose concentrations, which have been associated with increased mortality. Strictly normalizing these blood glucose levels by intensive insulin therapy, called tight glycemic control, decreased morbidity and mortality in well-controlled single-center clinical studies. However, multi-center pragmatic trials failed to reproduce those effects, proving that the implementation of tight glycemic control in daily clinical practice is rather difficult.

A computerized algorithm, amongst others, may help the nurses in the titration of insulin to reach normal blood glucose levels and to avoid the particularly worrisome hypoglycemia.

The LOGIC-1 study is a single blinded randomized controlled trial. On admission patients will be randomly assigned to either tight glycemic control (80-110 mg/dL) by the computerized LOGIC-Insulin 3.0 algorithm or to tight glycemic control (80-110 mg/dL) by the nurse-directed protocol. Written informed consent will be asked from the patient in the case of elective surgery requiring post-operative ICU-admission. Proxy informed consent from the closest family member will be asked when the patient was admitted to the ICU in emergency. As blood glucose control by itself is essential in the management of critical illness, random allocation will be done on admission and written informed consent from the closest family member can be deferred to a maximum of 24 hours after randomization. The patient or family member can at all times withdraw from the trial without impact on his treatment. Allocation will be done in blocks (block size is unknown to the care givers responsible for treatment allocation), stratified into cardiac surgery and other reasons for ICU admission, by central computer randomization.

The time window for the study will be 14 days starting from admission to the ICU or when one of the following stop criteria will be met:

* Withdrawal of the informed consent
* Patient starts eating or drinking sugar containing liquids
* Patient is discharged from the ICU (including ICU deaths)
* Removal of arterial line or central venous line

Under the following conditions the study investigator/treating physician will be contacted and, if necessary, patients will be switched from LOGIC-Insulin to nurse-directed blood glucose control:

* Recurrent severe hypoglycemia (\<40 mg/dL)
* Refractory hyperglycemia
* Any change in condition that compromises the safety of the patient, as judged by the investigator or treating physician

The common strategy for blood glucose control in both groups involves blood glucose measurements from arterial blood by a blood gas analyzer and the administration of insulin through a central line with a syringe pump.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Critical Illness

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Algorithm-guided versus Nurse directed Blood Glucose Control
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

LOGIC-Insulin

Blood glucose control (80-110 mg/dL) guided by the LOGIC-Insulin algorithm

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

LOGIC-Insulin

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Blood glucose control (80-110 mg/dL) guided by the LOGIC-Insulin algorithm

Nurse-directed

Nurse-directed blood glucose control (80-110 mg/dL)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Nurse directed

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Nurse directed insulin titration to establish glycemic control in the target range of 80-110 mg/dL

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Nurse directed

Nurse directed insulin titration to establish glycemic control in the target range of 80-110 mg/dL

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

LOGIC-Insulin

Blood glucose control (80-110 mg/dL) guided by the LOGIC-Insulin algorithm

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Active comparator: titration-guidelines supported TGC software guided TGC

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Aged 18 years or more
* Admitted to the ICU
* Already receiving or needing insulin infusion for blood glucose control

Exclusion Criteria

* Not critically ill (eating, not mechanically ventilated)
* Pregnant or breastfeeding
* Previous inclusion into the trial
* Included in other trial
* Moribund
* Diabetes coma
* No arterial line available
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Agency for Innovation by Science and Technology, Flanders, Belgium

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Fund for Scientific Research, Flanders, Belgium

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Greet Van den Berghe

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Greet Van den Berghe

Head of Dept Intensive Care Medicine

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Dieter Mesotten, MD, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

KU Leuven

Greet Van den Berghe, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

KU Leuven

Tom Van Herpe, Eng, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

KU Leuven

Bart De Moor, Eng, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

KU Leuven

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Dept Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven

Leuven, , Belgium

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

van den Berghe G, Wouters P, Weekers F, Verwaest C, Bruyninckx F, Schetz M, Vlasselaers D, Ferdinande P, Lauwers P, Bouillon R. Intensive insulin therapy in critically ill patients. N Engl J Med. 2001 Nov 8;345(19):1359-67. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa011300.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11794168 (View on PubMed)

Van Herpe T, De Brabanter J, Beullens M, De Moor B, Van den Berghe G. Glycemic penalty index for adequately assessing and comparing different blood glucose control algorithms. Crit Care. 2008;12(1):R24. doi: 10.1186/cc6800. Epub 2008 Feb 26.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18302732 (View on PubMed)

Van Herpe T, De Moor B, Van den Berghe G. Towards closed-loop glycaemic control. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2009 Mar;23(1):69-80. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2008.07.003.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19449617 (View on PubMed)

Van Herpe T, Mesotten D, Wouters PJ, Herbots J, Voets E, Buyens J, De Moor B, Van den Berghe G. LOGIC-insulin algorithm-guided versus nurse-directed blood glucose control during critical illness: the LOGIC-1 single-center, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Diabetes Care. 2013 Feb;36(2):188-94. doi: 10.2337/dc12-0584. Epub 2012 Sep 6.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 22961576 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.kuleuven.be/licm/

Leuven Laboratory Intensive Care Medicine

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

S 51956

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

80M0437

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

ML 6079

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

LOGIC-Insulin 1.1.1.

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Admission Glucose ICU Study
NCT00569322 COMPLETED
Enteral Nutrition and Glucose Homeostasis
NCT03012867 COMPLETED PHASE4