Efficacy and Safety of Three Insulin Protocols in Medical Intensive Care Unit Patients
NCT ID: NCT00410852
Last Updated: 2007-11-02
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
168 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2005-05-31
2007-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
We designed a computer guided protocol to adjust endovenous insulin infusion aiming glucose levels between 100mg/dl and 130 mg/dl. This trial evaluates the efficacy and safety of this protocol (algorithm A), compared to a standard endovenous insulin infusion protocol (algorithm B) and a conventional subcutaneous insulin protocol (algorithm C).
Methods : MICU patients with at least one blood glucose ≥ 150 mg/dL and who are on mechanical ventilation, or had SIRS, or are admitted because of trauma or burn will be randomized to one of the following treatments: algorithm A - continuous insulin infusion with adjustments guided by hand held device or desktop software targeting glucose levels between 100mg/dL-130mg/dL; algorithm B - continuous insulin aiming glucose levels between 80mg/dl-110mg/dl using Van den Berghe's insulin protocol; algorithm C - conventional treatment - intermittent subcutaneous administration of insulin if blood glucose levels exceeds 150mg/dL; insulin will be administered as IV boluses in hypotensive patients.
The randomization list was generated in blocks of six by computer software. Patients will be randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to have their glucose controlled by one of the three insulin algorithms with the use of a central, computerized system accessed by Internet, permitting concealment of allocation list. Randomization will be stratified according to study site.
The study is planned to enroll 165 patients in order to have 80% power to detect a 20mg/dl difference in blood glucose means between groups, assuming standard deviation equal to 33 mg/dl and two-tailed alpha equal to 0.05. Efficacy will be measured by the mean of patients' median blood glucose and safety measured by the incidence of hypoglycemia (≤40 mg/dL). Analysis will follow the intention-to-treat principle.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
A
Computer-assisted IV insulin infusion protocol (algorithm A)
Computer assisted insulin protocol (CAIP), with continuous intravenous insulin adjustments aiming blood glucose levels between 100 mg/dl and 130 mg/dl.
B
Leuven Strict glycemic control protocol (Algorithm B)
Leuven protocol: continuous intravenous insulin infusion aimiming blood glucose levels between 80mg/dl and 110mg/dl.
C
Conventional Intermittent Insulin Protocol (Algorithm C)
Conventional treatment: intermitent subcutaneous insulin according to a sliding scale, starting with blood glucose levels higher than 150mg/dl.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Computer-assisted IV insulin infusion protocol (algorithm A)
Computer assisted insulin protocol (CAIP), with continuous intravenous insulin adjustments aiming blood glucose levels between 100 mg/dl and 130 mg/dl.
Leuven Strict glycemic control protocol (Algorithm B)
Leuven protocol: continuous intravenous insulin infusion aimiming blood glucose levels between 80mg/dl and 110mg/dl.
Conventional Intermittent Insulin Protocol (Algorithm C)
Conventional treatment: intermitent subcutaneous insulin according to a sliding scale, starting with blood glucose levels higher than 150mg/dl.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
1. Clinical patients admitted to an Intensive Care Unit
2. At least one blood glucose measurement \>= 150 mg/dL (capilar, venous or arterial blood)
3. At least one of the following:
1. Patient on mechanical ventilation for an acute process, with expected duration of mechanical ventilation of at least 24 hours
2. Polytrauma patients
3. Severe burn patients
4. Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (modified criteria), with at least three of the following: core temperature \>=38°C or \<=36°C; heart rate \>=90 beats/min, except in patients with a medical condition or receiving a medication known to prevent tachycardia; respiratory heart rate \>= 20 breaths/min or a PaCO2 \<=32mmHg, or the use of mechanical ventilation for an acute process; white-cell count of \>=12.000/mm3 or \<=4.000/mm3 or a differential count showing \>10% percent immature neutrophils
Exclusion Criteria
* Surgical patients (surgery less than 24hs before admission to ICU)
* Diabetic ketoacidosis
* Non-ketotic hyperosmolar state
* Patients with defined diagnosis of brain death
* Moribund state in which death is perceived to be imminent
21 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
OTHER_GOV
Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein
OTHER
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Alexandre B Cavalcanti, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein
Eliezer Silva, PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein
Jose Eluf-Neto, PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Departamento de Medicina Preventiva, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Sao Paulo
Milton Caldeira, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hospital Regional Sao Jose
Glauco Westphal, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Centro Hospitalar UNIMED
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Complexo Hospitalar UNIMED
Joinville, Santa Catarina, Brazil
Hospital Dona Helena
Joinville, Santa Catarina, Brazil
Hospital Regional Sao Jose
Joinville, Santa Catarina, Brazil
Hospital Estadual Mario Covas
Santo André, São Paulo, Brazil
Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein
São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
FAPESP 2005/50557-5
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id