Efficacy and Safety of Three Insulin Protocols in Medical Intensive Care Unit Patients

NCT ID: NCT00410852

Last Updated: 2007-11-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

168 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2005-05-31

Study Completion Date

2007-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of three insulin algorithms in medical ICU patients (MICU).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Strict glycemic control has been recommended for critically ill patients. However, its implementation may face difficulties with increased nursing workload, inadequate glucose control and higher risk of hypoglycemia.

We designed a computer guided protocol to adjust endovenous insulin infusion aiming glucose levels between 100mg/dl and 130 mg/dl. This trial evaluates the efficacy and safety of this protocol (algorithm A), compared to a standard endovenous insulin infusion protocol (algorithm B) and a conventional subcutaneous insulin protocol (algorithm C).

Methods : MICU patients with at least one blood glucose ≥ 150 mg/dL and who are on mechanical ventilation, or had SIRS, or are admitted because of trauma or burn will be randomized to one of the following treatments: algorithm A - continuous insulin infusion with adjustments guided by hand held device or desktop software targeting glucose levels between 100mg/dL-130mg/dL; algorithm B - continuous insulin aiming glucose levels between 80mg/dl-110mg/dl using Van den Berghe's insulin protocol; algorithm C - conventional treatment - intermittent subcutaneous administration of insulin if blood glucose levels exceeds 150mg/dL; insulin will be administered as IV boluses in hypotensive patients.

The randomization list was generated in blocks of six by computer software. Patients will be randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to have their glucose controlled by one of the three insulin algorithms with the use of a central, computerized system accessed by Internet, permitting concealment of allocation list. Randomization will be stratified according to study site.

The study is planned to enroll 165 patients in order to have 80% power to detect a 20mg/dl difference in blood glucose means between groups, assuming standard deviation equal to 33 mg/dl and two-tailed alpha equal to 0.05. Efficacy will be measured by the mean of patients' median blood glucose and safety measured by the incidence of hypoglycemia (≤40 mg/dL). Analysis will follow the intention-to-treat principle.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Intensive Care

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Insulin Hyperglycemia Hypoglycemia Intensive care Critical care

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

A

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Computer-assisted IV insulin infusion protocol (algorithm A)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Computer assisted insulin protocol (CAIP), with continuous intravenous insulin adjustments aiming blood glucose levels between 100 mg/dl and 130 mg/dl.

B

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Leuven Strict glycemic control protocol (Algorithm B)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Leuven protocol: continuous intravenous insulin infusion aimiming blood glucose levels between 80mg/dl and 110mg/dl.

C

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Conventional Intermittent Insulin Protocol (Algorithm C)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Conventional treatment: intermitent subcutaneous insulin according to a sliding scale, starting with blood glucose levels higher than 150mg/dl.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Computer-assisted IV insulin infusion protocol (algorithm A)

Computer assisted insulin protocol (CAIP), with continuous intravenous insulin adjustments aiming blood glucose levels between 100 mg/dl and 130 mg/dl.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Leuven Strict glycemic control protocol (Algorithm B)

Leuven protocol: continuous intravenous insulin infusion aimiming blood glucose levels between 80mg/dl and 110mg/dl.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Conventional Intermittent Insulin Protocol (Algorithm C)

Conventional treatment: intermitent subcutaneous insulin according to a sliding scale, starting with blood glucose levels higher than 150mg/dl.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Criteria 1, 2 and 3 must be present:

1. Clinical patients admitted to an Intensive Care Unit
2. At least one blood glucose measurement \>= 150 mg/dL (capilar, venous or arterial blood)
3. At least one of the following:

1. Patient on mechanical ventilation for an acute process, with expected duration of mechanical ventilation of at least 24 hours
2. Polytrauma patients
3. Severe burn patients
4. Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (modified criteria), with at least three of the following: core temperature \>=38°C or \<=36°C; heart rate \>=90 beats/min, except in patients with a medical condition or receiving a medication known to prevent tachycardia; respiratory heart rate \>= 20 breaths/min or a PaCO2 \<=32mmHg, or the use of mechanical ventilation for an acute process; white-cell count of \>=12.000/mm3 or \<=4.000/mm3 or a differential count showing \>10% percent immature neutrophils

Exclusion Criteria

* Age \< 21 years
* Surgical patients (surgery less than 24hs before admission to ICU)
* Diabetic ketoacidosis
* Non-ketotic hyperosmolar state
* Patients with defined diagnosis of brain death
* Moribund state in which death is perceived to be imminent
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Alexandre B Cavalcanti, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein

Eliezer Silva, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein

Jose Eluf-Neto, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Departamento de Medicina Preventiva, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Sao Paulo

Milton Caldeira, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hospital Regional Sao Jose

Glauco Westphal, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Centro Hospitalar UNIMED

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Complexo Hospitalar UNIMED

Joinville, Santa Catarina, Brazil

Site Status

Hospital Dona Helena

Joinville, Santa Catarina, Brazil

Site Status

Hospital Regional Sao Jose

Joinville, Santa Catarina, Brazil

Site Status

Hospital Estadual Mario Covas

Santo André, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein

São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Brazil

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

FAPESP 2005/50557-5

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id