Blood Glucose Control Over an Extended Glucose Control Range in Postoperative Cardiac Surgery Patients in the Intensive Care Unit

NCT ID: NCT00882427

Last Updated: 2010-02-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-03-31

Study Completion Date

2009-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Hyperglycaemia is commonly found in critically ill patients. Clinical studies demonstrated that tight blood glucose control in medical and surgical ICU patients results in a significant better outcome for the patients. Based on this emerging clinical evidence, there are increasing efforts worldwide to maintain strict glycaemic control in critically ill patients. However, achieving this goal requires extensive nursing efforts, including frequent bedside glucose monitoring and the implementation of complex intensive insulin infusion protocols. A fully automated algorithm may help to overcome some of these limitations by excluding intuitive interventions and integrating relevant clinical data in the decision-making process. This study will investigate the performance of an eMPC algorithm adjusted to target the range 4.4 - 8.3 mmol/L in line with the Surviving Sepsis guidelines.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Critical Illness

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

eMPC

improved model predictive control algorithm (eMPC) for glycaemic control in ICU patients

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

enhanced model predictive control algorithm (eMPC)

Intervention Type OTHER

eMPC (software on a bedside computer) advised insulin titration to establish tight glycaemic control

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

enhanced model predictive control algorithm (eMPC)

eMPC (software on a bedside computer) advised insulin titration to establish tight glycaemic control

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age: \> 18 years of age
* Admitted following cardiac surgery
* Stay in the ICU expected to be \> 20h
* Blood glucose \> 6.7 mmol/l within 4 hours of admission to intensive care or patient already receiving insulin treatment

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with hyperglycaemic crisis/ketoacidosis due to insulin deficiency.
* Known or suspected allergy to insulin
* Any disease or condition which the investigator or treating physician feels would interfere with the trial or the safety of the patient (i.e. liver failure, other fatal organ failures)
* Patients participating in another study
* Moribund patients likely to die within 24 hours
* Patients after organ transplantation within the last three months
* Patients under high dose cortisol treatment (cortisol \> 1000 mg/day or equivalent doses of hydrocortisol)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

B. Braun Melsungen AG

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

B. Braun Melsungen AG

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jeremy Cordingley, Dr.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Royal Brompton Hospital and Harefield NHS Trust

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Cordingley JJ, Vlasselaers D, Dormand NC, Wouters PJ, Squire SD, Chassin LJ, Wilinska ME, Morgan CJ, Hovorka R, Van den Berghe G. Intensive insulin therapy: enhanced Model Predictive Control algorithm versus standard care. Intensive Care Med. 2009 Jan;35(1):123-8. doi: 10.1007/s00134-008-1236-z. Epub 2008 Jul 26.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18661120 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

HC-G-H-0807

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.