Reconstruction Plate Compared With Flexible Intramedullary Nailing for Midshaft Clavicular Fractures

NCT ID: NCT01410032

Last Updated: 2014-04-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

59 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-07-31

Study Completion Date

2014-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical and radiographic results of patients with midshaft clavicular fractures treated with plates or intramedullary flexible nails fixation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Midshaft clavicular fractures are classically treated with non-surgical methods, supported by many authors as an effective treatment. However, different researches have shown high rates of nonunion and clavicle malunion related to the nonoperative treatment. Currently, indications for surgical treatment are wider and include mainly the following: shortening greater than or equal to 2.0 cm, multiple trauma, open fractures or with imminent exposure and associated neurovascular injury.

Plate fixation of midshaft clavicular fractures is widely described in the literature, and is considered the gold standard by different authors, associated with a high union rate and a low complication rate. Different types of plates have been used, including reconstruction plates, dynamic compression plates (DCP), low-contact dynamic compression plates (LC-DCP), semi-tubular plates, and pre-molded locking plates. Possible complications are postoperative infection, hardware loosening or failure, peri-incision paresthesia, neurovascular iatrogenic lesions, nonunion, and hardware related symptoms.

Elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) technique has been used in recent years in the treatment of midshaft clavicular fractures. Different studies report excellent functional results and low complication rates. Some theoretical advantages in relation to plates are the 3-point flexible nail support, which provides superior biomechanics resistance and uses the relative stability principle, favoring callus formation. When compared to plain steel wires, titanium nails have lower migration risk, due to its greater flexibility and better bone fixation.

The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical and radiographic results of patients with midshaft clavicular fractures treated with reconstruction plates or ESIN.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Clavicle Fracture

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Plate fixation

Reconstruction plate

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Plate fixation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Reconstruction plate

ESIN

ESIN (Elastic Stable Intramedullary Nailing)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

ESIN

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

ESIN (Elastic Stable Intramedullary Nailing)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Plate fixation

Reconstruction plate

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

ESIN

ESIN (Elastic Stable Intramedullary Nailing)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Displaced Fractures of the middle third of the clavicle (no contact between the main fragments)
2. Age between 16 and 65 year old;
3. Terms of consent signed by the patient or guardian.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Fracture of medial or lateral third of the clavicle;
2. Cortical contact between the main fracture fragments;
3. Age below 16 years old or more than 65 years old;
4. Pathological fracture;
5. Ipsilateral previous injuries of the shoulder or upper limb;
6. Ipsilateral associated fractures of the shoulder or upper limb;
7. Neuro-vascular injury associated;
8. Open fracture not eligible for primary internal fixation;
9. Clinical contraindication for surgery;
10. Fracture older than 30 days;
11. Patient not cooperative or ineligible for the follow-up;
12. Lack of consent to participate.
Minimum Eligible Age

16 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Sao Paulo

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Fernando B Andrade-Silva, MD

MD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Fernando B Andrade-Silva, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Sao Paulo - Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Sao Paulo - Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology

São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Brazil

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Andrade-Silva FB, Kojima KE, Joeris A, Santos Silva J, Mattar R Jr. Single, superiorly placed reconstruction plate compared with flexible intramedullary nailing for midshaft clavicular fractures: a prospective, randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Apr 15;97(8):620-6. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.N.00497.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 25878305 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IOT-HCFMUSP

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.