Reconstruction Plate Compared With Flexible Intramedullary Nailing for Midshaft Clavicular Fractures
NCT ID: NCT01410032
Last Updated: 2014-04-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
59 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-07-31
2014-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Plate Osteosynthesis Versus ESIN of Displaced Midclavicular Fractures
NCT01015924
Study Comparing Intramedullary Nailing, Plate Fixation, and Non-operative Treatment of Clavicle Fractures
NCT01311219
Functional Outcome in Midshaft Clavicle Fracture, Treated With Superior Versus Anteroinferior Reconstruction Plate
NCT03533634
Intramedullary Screw Versus Plate in Displaced Midshaft Clavicle Fractures
NCT05262998
Fixation of Displaced Midshaft Clavicular Fractures in Adults by Intramedullary Elastic Rod
NCT03462901
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Plate fixation of midshaft clavicular fractures is widely described in the literature, and is considered the gold standard by different authors, associated with a high union rate and a low complication rate. Different types of plates have been used, including reconstruction plates, dynamic compression plates (DCP), low-contact dynamic compression plates (LC-DCP), semi-tubular plates, and pre-molded locking plates. Possible complications are postoperative infection, hardware loosening or failure, peri-incision paresthesia, neurovascular iatrogenic lesions, nonunion, and hardware related symptoms.
Elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) technique has been used in recent years in the treatment of midshaft clavicular fractures. Different studies report excellent functional results and low complication rates. Some theoretical advantages in relation to plates are the 3-point flexible nail support, which provides superior biomechanics resistance and uses the relative stability principle, favoring callus formation. When compared to plain steel wires, titanium nails have lower migration risk, due to its greater flexibility and better bone fixation.
The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical and radiographic results of patients with midshaft clavicular fractures treated with reconstruction plates or ESIN.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Plate fixation
Reconstruction plate
Plate fixation
Reconstruction plate
ESIN
ESIN (Elastic Stable Intramedullary Nailing)
ESIN
ESIN (Elastic Stable Intramedullary Nailing)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Plate fixation
Reconstruction plate
ESIN
ESIN (Elastic Stable Intramedullary Nailing)
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Age between 16 and 65 year old;
3. Terms of consent signed by the patient or guardian.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Cortical contact between the main fracture fragments;
3. Age below 16 years old or more than 65 years old;
4. Pathological fracture;
5. Ipsilateral previous injuries of the shoulder or upper limb;
6. Ipsilateral associated fractures of the shoulder or upper limb;
7. Neuro-vascular injury associated;
8. Open fracture not eligible for primary internal fixation;
9. Clinical contraindication for surgery;
10. Fracture older than 30 days;
11. Patient not cooperative or ineligible for the follow-up;
12. Lack of consent to participate.
16 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Sao Paulo
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Fernando B Andrade-Silva, MD
MD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Fernando B Andrade-Silva, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Sao Paulo - Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Sao Paulo - Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology
São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Andrade-Silva FB, Kojima KE, Joeris A, Santos Silva J, Mattar R Jr. Single, superiorly placed reconstruction plate compared with flexible intramedullary nailing for midshaft clavicular fractures: a prospective, randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Apr 15;97(8):620-6. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.N.00497.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IOT-HCFMUSP
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.