Comparing Dual Mini-fragment Plating to Single Precontoured Plating of Acute Midshaft Clavicle Fractures Trial
NCT ID: NCT05231343
Last Updated: 2023-05-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
66 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-04-04
2028-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Functional Outcome in Midshaft Clavicle Fracture, Treated With Superior Versus Anteroinferior Reconstruction Plate
NCT03533634
Conservative Treatment Compared to Osteosynthesis in Patients With a Fractured Collar Bone
NCT01078480
Double Plating Versus Single Plating Techniques in Midshaft Clavicle Fractures
NCT05579873
Surgically Treated Displaced Mid-diaphyseal Clavicle Fractures
NCT05867355
Conservative Treatment Versus Operative Plate Fixation for Acute, Displaced Fractures of the Distal Clavicle
NCT00872105
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Traditional plating techniques for open reduction and internal fixation of clavicle fractures involved the use of a single 3.5-mm plates placed superiorly or anteriorly. However, these plates are often very prominent under the skin causing irritation, and in many cases result in reoperation for hardware removal. The rate of reoperation for removal of symptomatic hardware has been reported to range from 8% to 66%. For this reason, there have been a number of different fixation strategies describes to minimize the need to return to the operating room for implant-related symptoms. These include intramedullary nailing and the use of anatomic precontoured clavicle plates positioned superiorly or anteroinferiorly. However, even with the use of precontoured plates, the reported hardware removal rate varies from 5% to 47%. This is likely due to the significant variation in clavicle anatomy (i.e., sigmoid curve, coronal bow and length) observed between individuals which precludes anatomic fitting of precontoured plates in all patients. In fact, Malhas and colleagues published a cadaveric study that found further contouring of precontoured plates was necessary in 73% of cases to optimize plate-bone fit.
More recently, a dual plate construct using two mini-fragment plates (i.e., 2.4-mm or 2.7-mm plates) placed orthogonally has been advocated as a means of decreasing the rate of reoperation for symptomatic hardware removal. In 2015, Prasarn et al. reported on a series of 17 patients undergoing clavicle fixation using a 2.7-mm plate positioned superiorly and a 2.4-mm plate positioned anteriorly and had no reoperations while noting a 100% union rate. The idea of dual plating is not new and is commonly used in the setting of clavicle fracture non-union fixation. Its efficacy has also been described in distal clavicle fractures. Dual plating may serve as the ideal low-profile implant option to help diminish the high rates of symptomatic implant removal observed with single plating. The benefits associated with a dual plate construct extend beyond a reduction in implant-related soft-tissue irritation. Intraoperatively, dual plating allows for more points of fixation, buttressing of anterior butterfly fragments, mini-fragment plates to be used as washers for multiple lag screws, and the use of either the superior or anterior plate as a reduction aid or clamp, while the second plate is applied. Based on existing biomechanical data in the literature, the ability of a dual plate construct to withstand multiplanar bending forces better than a single plate construct may also allow for early weight-bearing through the affected extremity. Despite the aforementioned benefits of dual plate fixation, there remains a lack of level I evidence for its use in the surgical management of acute midshaft clavicle fractures.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Dual mini-fragment plating
Dual Mini-fragment Plating
Patients randomized to dual mini-fragment plating will undergo clavicle fixation using any configuration of 2.0-mm, 2.4-mm and 2.7-mm limited contact dynamic compression (LC-DCP), locking compression (LCP) or reconstruction plates (i.e., 2.4-mm superior and 2.7-mm anteroinferior). One of the two plates used must be a LC-DCP or LCP plate. Surgeons will contour the mini-fragment plate intraoperatively to fit each patient's anatomy.
Single precontoured plating
Single Precontoured Plating
Patients randomized to a single plate construct will undergo fixation using an anatomically precontoured (superior or anterior-inferior) clavicle plate.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Dual Mini-fragment Plating
Patients randomized to dual mini-fragment plating will undergo clavicle fixation using any configuration of 2.0-mm, 2.4-mm and 2.7-mm limited contact dynamic compression (LC-DCP), locking compression (LCP) or reconstruction plates (i.e., 2.4-mm superior and 2.7-mm anteroinferior). One of the two plates used must be a LC-DCP or LCP plate. Surgeons will contour the mini-fragment plate intraoperatively to fit each patient's anatomy.
Single Precontoured Plating
Patients randomized to a single plate construct will undergo fixation using an anatomically precontoured (superior or anterior-inferior) clavicle plate.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* A completely displaced midshaft fracture of the clavicle (no cortical contact between the main proximal and distal fragments (AO/OTA 15.2A/B/C)
* Fracture amenable to plate fixation with a minimum of three screws in each proximal and distal fragment
Exclusion Criteria
* Pathological fracture
* Fracture seen \> 28 days after injury
* Associated neurovascular injury
* Associated head injury (Glasgow Coma Scale \< 12)
* Concomitant ipsilateral upper extremity fracture
* Significant medical comorbidities (i.e., ASA grade IV and V)
* Inability to comply with follow-up and
* Lack of consent
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Canadian Orthopaedic Trauma Society
OTHER
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Dr. Ujash Sheth
Orthopaedic Surgeon
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ujash Sheth, MD MSc FRCSC
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
COMPACT
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.