Non-Operative Versus Operative Treatment for High-Energy Midshaft Clavicle Fractures

NCT ID: NCT00590850

Last Updated: 2023-11-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

412 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2003-10-31

Study Completion Date

2023-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Clavicle (collar bone) fractures account for about 33% of all fractures around the shoulder. Some surgeons suggest that surgical treatment is the best option, while others suggest that nonoperative care is the best treatment. There is no evidence to date that either option in superior. For this reason, we propose to conduct a prospective, randomized clinical trial of surgical versus non-surgical treatment of displaced high-energy clavicle fractures. This study will use both objective clinical and patient-based outcome measures. The purpose of this study is to see if there is a difference between clinical outcomes (healing rate, time to healing, time to return to work, Constant Score, complications), functional outcomes (DASH Score), and health related quality of life (SF-36) in nonoperative care and two types of surgical care for displaced fractures of the clavicular shaft in adults.

Included patients will be randomized into one of three groups: nonoperative care (Group N); surgical care using plates and screws (Group P); and surgical care using intramedullary pin put inside of the clavicle to stabilize it (Group I).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

High Energy Midshaft Clavicle Fractures

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Closed

Closed Treatment

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

ORIF

Open Reduction and Internal Fixation (ORIF) with Plate and Screws

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

ORIF with Plate and Screws

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

ORIF with plate and screws

Pin

Pin Fixation

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Pin Fixation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Clavicle fixation with clavicle pin

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

ORIF with Plate and Screws

ORIF with plate and screws

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Pin Fixation

Clavicle fixation with clavicle pin

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* ages of 18 and 85
* a midshaft clavicle fracture
* fracture displaced the width of the clavicle or shortened at least 1.5 cm
* less than 21 days since the injury

Exclusion Criteria

* injury involving the lateral ligaments
* fracture involve the sternoclavicular joint
* Pathologic Fracture
* Open Fracture
* Fracture with neurovascular compromise
* Displaced fracture with impending skin compromise
* Medical comorbidities that preclude surgery
* Associated injuries to ipsilateral shoulder girdle
* severe cognitive disability or injury that may inhibit study form completion
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Orthopaedic Trauma Association

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Indiana University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Prisma Health-Upstate

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Kyle J Jeray, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Greenville Hospital System

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Prisma Health

Greenville, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Jeray KJ, Broderick JS, Mullis BH, Everhart J, Tanner SL, Snider BG; Southeastern Fracture Consortium. Multicenter, Prospective, Observational Study of Nonoperative Versus Operative Treatment for High-Energy Midshaft Clavicle Fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2024 Jul 1;38(7):345-350. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002817.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 38837208 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

GHS-07-03-04

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Study on Outcomes of Proximal Humerus Fractures
NCT07060664 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA