Study Comparing Intramedullary Nailing, Plate Fixation, and Non-operative Treatment of Clavicle Fractures

NCT ID: NCT01311219

Last Updated: 2016-09-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

WITHDRAWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-05-31

Study Completion Date

2009-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Patients with acute, displaced fractures of the middle third of the clavicle will be randomly assigned into either the non-operative treatment group or the operative treatment group. The operative treatment group will be randomly assigned to repair with either an intramedullary device or a plate and screws.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Patients with acute, displaced fractures of the middle third of the clavicle will be randomly assigned into either the non-operative treatment group or the operative treatment group. The operative treatment group will be randomly assigned to repair with either an intramedullary device or a plate and screws. Pre-operative variables will be accounted for in detail. Operative variables including duration of surgery, length of incision, fluoroscopy times, blood loss, and quality of reduction will be recorded. Patients will be followed with regular post-operative visits in which radiographs and clinical examination will be performed. Outcome variables will include post-operative pain, time to union, union/non-union rate, return to work, return to activity, radiographic outcome, complication rates, incidence of repeat procedures, cosmesis, and functional outcome based on strength, range of motion, and scoring systems. There are five hypotheses for this study: 1) Operative treatment of acute displaced midshaft clavicle fractures will yield better patient-based functional outcomes when compared to nonoperative treatment as measured by physical assessment of strength and range of motion, standardized scoring systems and return to normal daily activities. 2) Operative treatment of acute displaced midshaft clavicle fractures will yield lower radiographically-determined nonunion rates, improved cosmesis and fewer complaints of residual pain when compared to nonoperative treatment. 3) Operative treatment of acute displaced midshaft clavicle fractures with intramedullary pinning will be more efficacious than operative treatment with plate fixation as measured by duration of surgery, length of incision, fluoroscopy time, blood loss, and quality of reduction. 4) Operative treatment of acute displaced midshaft clavicle fractures with intramedullary pinning will result in fewer complications than operative treatment with plate fixation including; nonunion rate, infection, incidence of repeat procedures, refracture rate, and hardware malfunction. 5) Operative treatment of acute displaced midshaft clavicle fractures with intramedullary pinning will yield lower radiographically-determined nonunion rates, improved cosmesis, and fewer complaints of residual pain when compared to operative treatment with plate fixation.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Clavicle Fractures

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

No surgery

Non-operative Treatment

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Non-operative Treatment

Intervention Type OTHER

A figure-of-8 brace will be applied to afflicted extremity in clinic. The patient will be instructed on proper application of the brace and asked to continue wearing the brace for 2 to 6 weeks, depending on the patient's level of comfort.

Plate fixation

Operative Treatment-Plate fixation

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Operative Treatment-Plate Fixation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Plate fixation of the clavicle fracture will be performed utilizing a 3.5-mm dynamic compression plate.

Intramedullary pinning

Operative Treatment-Intramedullary Pinning

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Operative Treatment-Intramedullary Pinning

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Clavicle fracture will be repaired through intramedullary pinning using The Rockwood Clavicle Pin (DePuy Orthopaedics, Warsaw, IN).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Non-operative Treatment

A figure-of-8 brace will be applied to afflicted extremity in clinic. The patient will be instructed on proper application of the brace and asked to continue wearing the brace for 2 to 6 weeks, depending on the patient's level of comfort.

Intervention Type OTHER

Operative Treatment-Plate Fixation

Plate fixation of the clavicle fracture will be performed utilizing a 3.5-mm dynamic compression plate.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Operative Treatment-Intramedullary Pinning

Clavicle fracture will be repaired through intramedullary pinning using The Rockwood Clavicle Pin (DePuy Orthopaedics, Warsaw, IN).

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

\-

Exclusion Criteria

\-
Minimum Eligible Age

16 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Missouri-Columbia

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Richard A White, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Missouri-Columbia

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Missouri-Columbia

Columbia, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Bostman O, Manninen M, Pihlajamaki H. Complications of plate fixation in fresh displaced midclavicular fractures. J Trauma. 1997 Nov;43(5):778-83. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199711000-00008.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9390489 (View on PubMed)

Canadian Orthopaedic Trauma Society. Nonoperative treatment compared with plate fixation of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures. A multicenter, randomized clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Jan;89(1):1-10. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00020.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17200303 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1109438-1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

NCT01307670

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: nct_alias

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.