Clinical Outcomes Following Glenoid Neck Fracture as Correlated With Quantitative Assessment of Osseous Injury
NCT ID: NCT00644813
Last Updated: 2020-01-02
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
98 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2008-03-31
2019-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Non-Operative Versus Operative Treatment for High-Energy Midshaft Clavicle Fractures
NCT00590850
Fixation of Glenoid Fractures
NCT04070859
Treatment of Pediatric Mid-shaft Clavicle Fractures: A Prospective, Observational Study
NCT03402269
Study Comparing Intramedullary Nailing, Plate Fixation, and Non-operative Treatment of Clavicle Fractures
NCT01311219
Followup of Glenoid Fix Utilizing Auto Bone Graft in Shoulder Replacement
NCT00670852
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Scapular fractures specifically involving the glenoid neck have the potential to significantly change the geometry of glenohumeral joint (shoulder joint) as well as affect the actions of muscles and nerves that act across it. Although most reports indicate patients sustaining glenoid neck fractures did well following nonoperative treatment, there was little use of validated outcome measures. Additionally, the context of severe trauma may have lead to an underestimation of functional recovery.
Advances in imaging technology combined with the evolution of internal fixation techniques have resulted in sporadic attempts at fixation of glenoid neck fractures, usually when they occurred in concert with bony injury to other members of the shoulder girdle, as in the "floating shoulder". However, in the absence of a universal canon of radiograph measurements, there are no current recommendations for operative versus non-operative management based on the characteristics of osseous injury as correlated with probable clinical outcome. Moreover, the common assertion that nonoperative management of scapular fractures leads to adequate functional outcome has not been rigorously examined in a prospective fashion, despite this being the standard of care nationally.
Recent evidence suggests that nonoperative treatment may lead to significant decreases in strength and forelimb function despite the fact that the standard of care for the vast majority of these injuries does not involve surgery or reduction. The same may be true of glenoid neck fractures, as significant shortening or angulation of this metaphyseal isthmus may have a detrimental effect on the functional geometry of the glenohumeral (shoulder) joint. If so, surgical management may be indicated to restore a more physiologic geometry to the joint, and thereby give the best chance of recovery to a pre-injury level of function. It is our hope that these correlates of measurements and outcome will help codify an a priori set of radiograph evaluation criteria to help guide decisions for surgical versus non-operative management of glenoid neck fractures. The purpose of the study is to: 1) define the degree of forelimb dysfunction brought about by this specific injury and 2) the magnitude of osseous injury to the glenoid neck that can be tolerated before functional outcome is unacceptably impeded.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Scapular with glenoid neck fractures
Collect outcome and radiological data on patients with scapular fractures involving the glenoid neck (bone joining the shoulder joint and the scapular body) for a period of 1 year.
Scapular with glenoid neck fractures
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Scapular with glenoid neck fractures
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Extraarticular scapular fractures Scapular fracture is isolated or in concert with nondisplaced ipsilateral fractures of the clavicle, coracoid or acromion or has a clavicle fracture been operatively reduced or fixed?
* Patient is free of preexisting neuromuscular or psychiatric dysfunction
* Patient is free of previous upper extremity injury that would impede objective functional outcome evaluation
* Patient received a CT scan as part of their initial clinical care
* Patient is English speaking
* Patient is signed the informed consent form
Exclusion Criteria
* Displaced fractures of the acromion, clavicle, or coracoid
* Concomitant injury to the forelimb
* Patients mentally or physically unable to perform the function evaluation
* Patients unwilling or unable to follow up for 1 year
* Patients with poor propensity to follow up; drug, alcohol issues, etc.
* Non English speaking patients
* Patients currently or pending incarceration in prison
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Boston Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Paul Tornetta, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Boston University / Boston Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Indiana University
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
Boston Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
University of Michigan Health system
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
Orthopaedic Associates of Michigan
Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States
Orthopaedic associates of Michigan
Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States
Hennepin County Medical Center
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
Barnes-Jewish Hospital
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Charlotte Medical Center
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
University of Oklahoma
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
Oregon Health & Science University
Portland, Oregon, United States
Orthopaedic Specialty Associates - Fort Worth
Fort Worth, Texas, United States
University of Utah
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
QEII Health Science Center
Halifax, , Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
H-26863
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.