Durham Connects RCT Evaluation

NCT ID: NCT01406184

Last Updated: 2025-06-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

2329 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-07-31

Study Completion Date

2027-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) is to evaluate the impact and mechanisms of the Durham Connects (DC) brief universal nurse home-visiting program to prevent child maltreatment and improve child well-being. It is the first-ever RCT of a home-visiting program that is designed to prevent child maltreatment in an entire community population.

Evaluation of program impact will test three hypotheses: 1) Random assignment to the Durham Connects Program will be associated with lower rates of child maltreatment and emergency department maltreatment-related injuries, better pediatric care, better parental functioning, and better child well-being than assignment as control; 2) Intervention effect sizes will be larger for higher-risk groups; and 3) Community resource use and enhanced family functioning will mediate the positive impact of Durham Connects on outcomes.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The Durham Connects Program is an innovative, community based, universal nurse home-visiting program that aims to lower the population rate of child maltreatment and improve mother and child health and well-being. The Durham Connects Program is implemented jointly by the Durham County (North Carolina) Department of Public Health, the Center for Child \& Family Health (a community non-profit), and Duke University. It is designed to be brief and inexpensive per family so that communities can afford its costs. Its goals are consistent with those of more intensive nurse home-visiting programs: 1) to connect with the mother in order to enhance maternal skills and self-efficacy; and 2) to connect the mother with needed community services such as health care, child care, mental health care, and financial and social support; so that 3) the mother can connect with her child.

DC achieves population reach by engaging all families within the community, rapidly triaging families based on identified risk to concentrate resources to families with greater needs, and connecting those families with significant nurse-identified risk to matched community programs and services to provide long-term support and a first step into the community system of care. The program consists of 4-7 manualized intervention contacts, including 1) a hospital birthing visit when a staff member communicates the importance of community support for parenting and schedules an initial home visit; 2) 1-3 nurse home visits between 3-12 weeks of infant age to provide physical assessments for infant and mother, intervention and education, assessment of family-specific needs, and for families with significant nurse-identified risk, connections to matched community resources to provide longer-term support; 3) 1-2 nurse contacts with community service providers to facilitate successful connections; and 4) a telephone follow-up one month after case closure to review consumer satisfaction and community connection outcomes. With family consent, letters from the program reporting on the visit are also provided to also connect families to maternal and infant healthcare providers for ongoing support.

During home visits, the nurse engages the mother (and father, when possible) to provide brief educational interventions for all families (e.g., safe sleep) and utilizes a high-inference approach to assess family needs across 12 empirically-derived factors linked to child health and well-being:

Healthcare: parent health, infant health, health care plans; Parenting/childcare: childcare plans, parent-infant relationship, management of infant crying; Family violence/safety: material supports, family violence, maltreatment history; and Parent well-being: depression/anxiety, substance abuse, social/emotional support.

The nurse scores each of the 12 factors and intervenes accordingly. A score of 1 (low risk) receives no subsequent intervention. A score of 2 (moderate risk) receives short-term, nurse-delivered intervention over 1-2 sessions. For a score of 3 (high risk) the nurse connects the family to matched community resources tailored to address that particular risk (such as, treatment for postpartum depression, a DSS social worker exclusively serving Durham Connects families for enrollment in Medicaid or food stamps, a multi-year home visiting program for long-term parent support). The nurse also provides follow up to make sure that each connection "sticks," requiring additional contacts with the family or community agency. A score of 4 (imminent risk) receives emergency intervention (\<1% of cases). A final contact four weeks after case closure ascertains community connection outcomes and whether further problem solving is needed to address new or existing needs.

From July 1, 2009-December 31, 2010, all 4777 resident births from two Durham County hospitals (one academic tertiary care hospital and one community hospital) were randomized at the even-odd birth date group level, with families assigned to one of two intervention groups based on infant birth date: 1) even birth date families (n=2327) were randomly assigned to receive DC; DC staff attempted to schedule and visit all even birth date families; 2) odd birth date families (n=2450) were randomly assigned to receive other community services as usual and served as the control group. All eligible families (i.e., families living in Durham County giving birth at one of the two county hospitals) were included with experimental rigor, and without exception, but with ethical care for confidentiality. Hospital discharge records were utilized to confirm eligibility for all RCT families. The Duke University Health System Institutional Review Board approved all RCT implementation and evaluation procedures.

Completely independent of program implementation, a random, representative subsample of 549 families was selected to conduct an independent evaluation of DC beginning at infant age 6 months (initial interviews completed between infant ages 6-8 months). Use of random subsamples for evaluation of population-level interventions allows for testing of intervention impact while minimizing evaluation costs (e.g., Moving to Opportunity for Fair Housing intervention15). Consistent with this evaluation strategy, one family was randomly selected by computer algorithm from public birth records for each of the 549 days of the 18-month RCT enrollment period in order to examine program impact for families enrolled across the entire trial period. Families were selected from the entire population of eligible birth records (i.e., resident Durham County births at one of the two county birthing hospitals) without consideration for intervention participation or adherence. Selected families that declined participation were replaced with a randomly selected family with the same child birth date and race/ethnicity as the original family, in order to preserve any lack of selection bias based on these characteristics.

Selected families were contacted and invited to participate in a descriptive research study about family community service use and child development. Families were blind to study goals, and home interviewers were blind to family DC participation status. Overall, 682 families were randomly selected and 549 (81%) participated (n=269 DC-eligible families; n=280 control families). Post-hoc comparisons of hospital discharge records and public birth records after all evaluation study consenting and interviews were complete identified 18 participating families that were subsequently declared ineligible due to hospital discharge record error (n=13 families with no hospital discharge record; n=3 families with child birth date discrepancies; and n=2 families with address discrepancies affecting Durham County residency), resulting in a final sample of 664 selected families and 531 participating families. The ineligible families (n=9 DC-eligible families; n=9 control families) were removed without consideration for intervention adherence or evaluation outcomes.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Unspecified Child Maltreatment, Suspected Unspecified Child Maltreatment, Confirmed

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Durham Connects Eligible Group

From July 1, 2009 - December 31, 2010, all even-birth-date residential births in Durham County, North Carolina were randomly assigned to receive the Durham Connects nurse home visiting program.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Durham Connects

Intervention Type OTHER

The program consists of 4-7 intervention contacts, including 1) a hospital birthing visit when a staff member schedules an initial home visit; 2) 1-3 nurse home visits between 3-12 weeks of infant age to provide physical assessments for infant and mother, intervention and education, assessment of family-specific needs, and connections to matched community resources, as needed, to provide longer-term support; 3) 1-2 nurse contacts with community service providers to facilitate successful connections; and 4) a telephone follow-up one month after case closure to review community connection outcomes. With family consent, letters from the program reporting on the visit are also provided to also connect families to maternal and infant healthcare providers for ongoing support.

Control Group

From July 1, 2009 - December 31, 2010, all odd-birth-date residential births in Durham County, North Carolina were randomly assigned to a control group condition. These families were assigned to receive services as usual and served as the randomized comparison group for evaluating Durham Connects program impact.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Durham Connects

The program consists of 4-7 intervention contacts, including 1) a hospital birthing visit when a staff member schedules an initial home visit; 2) 1-3 nurse home visits between 3-12 weeks of infant age to provide physical assessments for infant and mother, intervention and education, assessment of family-specific needs, and connections to matched community resources, as needed, to provide longer-term support; 3) 1-2 nurse contacts with community service providers to facilitate successful connections; and 4) a telephone follow-up one month after case closure to review community connection outcomes. With family consent, letters from the program reporting on the visit are also provided to also connect families to maternal and infant healthcare providers for ongoing support.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Infant born between July 1, 2009 and December 31, 2010
* Infant born at Durham County, North Carolina (NC) hospital (Duke or Durham Regional)
* Family of infant resides in Durham County, NC

Exclusion Criteria

* Infant born before July 1, 2009 or after December 31, 2010
* Infant not born at Durham County, NC hospital
* Family of infant resides outside of Durham County, NC
Maximum Eligible Age

6 Months

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

The Duke Endowment

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

The Pew Charitable Trusts

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Robert Wood Johnson Foundation

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Duke University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Kenneth Dodge, Ph.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Duke University

Robert Murphy, Ph.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Center for Child & Family Health

Karen O'Donnell, Ph.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Center for Child & Family Health

W. Benjamin Goodman, Ph.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Duke University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Center for Child and Family Policy, Duke University

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Dodge KA, Goodman WB, Murphy RA, O'Donnell K, Sato J, Guptill S. Implementation and randomized controlled trial evaluation of universal postnatal nurse home visiting. Am J Public Health. 2014 Feb;104 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S136-43. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301361. Epub 2013 Dec 19.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 24354833 (View on PubMed)

Dodge KA, Goodman WB, Murphy RA, O'Donnell K, Sato J. Randomized controlled trial of universal postnatal nurse home visiting: impact on emergency care. Pediatrics. 2013 Nov;132 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S140-6. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-1021M.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 24187116 (View on PubMed)

Dodge KA, Goodman WB, Murphy R, O'Donnell K, Sato J. Toward Population Impact from Home Visiting. Zero Three. 2013 Jan 1;33(3):17-23.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 23526864 (View on PubMed)

Alonso-Marsden S, Dodge KA, O'Donnell KJ, Murphy RA, Sato JM, Christopoulos C. Family risk as a predictor of initial engagement and follow-through in a universal nurse home visiting program to prevent child maltreatment. Child Abuse Negl. 2013 Aug;37(8):555-65. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2013.03.012. Epub 2013 May 6.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 23660409 (View on PubMed)

Goodman WB, Dodge KA, Bai Y, O'Donnell KJ, Murphy RA. Randomized controlled trial of Family Connects: Effects on child emergency medical care from birth to 24 months. Dev Psychopathol. 2019 Dec;31(5):1863-1872. doi: 10.1017/S0954579419000889.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 31477190 (View on PubMed)

Goodman WB, Dodge KA, Bai Y, Murphy RA, O'Donnell K. Effect of a Universal Postpartum Nurse Home Visiting Program on Child Maltreatment and Emergency Medical Care at 5 Years of Age: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jul 1;4(7):e2116024. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.16024.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 34232300 (View on PubMed)

Dodge KA, Goodman WB, Bai Y, Best DL, Rehder P, Hill S. Impact of a universal perinatal home-visiting program on reduction in race disparities in maternal and child health: Two randomised controlled trials and a field quasi-experiment. Lancet Reg Health Am. 2022 Aug 23;15:100356. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2022.100356. eCollection 2022 Nov.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 36778074 (View on PubMed)

Baziyants GA, Dodge KA, Bai Y, Goodman WB, O'Donnell K, Murphy RA. The effects of a universal short-term home visiting program: Two-year impact on parenting behavior and parent mental health. Child Abuse Negl. 2023 Jun;140:106140. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2023.106140. Epub 2023 Mar 22.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 36963242 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://childandfamilypolicy.duke.edu/

Center for Child \& Family Policy, Duke University

http://www.ccfhnc.org/

Center for Child \& Family Health

http://www.familyconnects.org/

Family Connects Website

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Pro00017478

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

1R01HD069981

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

Pro00020974

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

Pro00027652

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

Pro00020974

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Virtual Village for Young Parents
NCT07226401 RECRUITING NA