Prospective Evaluation of Interscalene Nerve Catheters vs. Single Injection Blocks

NCT ID: NCT01385449

Last Updated: 2019-02-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

73 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-06-30

Study Completion Date

2016-02-29

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The primary hypothesis is that those patients who choose an interscalene catheter will have less pain postoperatively than those with single injection blocks. Secondary hypotheses examine physical therapy outcomes and incidence of parasthesia or pain following surgery for up to 3 months.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

interscalene block

interscalene block

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

interscalene block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

interscalene block

interscalene catheter

interscalene catheter

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

interscalene catheter

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

interscalene catheter

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

interscalene catheter

interscalene catheter

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

interscalene block

interscalene block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status 1-3
* 18-79 years of age, inclusive
* body mass index of \< 36 kg/m2.
* The ability to understand local anesthetic related complications and care of a CPNB
* Presence of a caretaker with them during the first 24 hours of local anesthetic infusion, and on a daily basis.
* The ability to communicate with the practitioner managing the catheter.
* Residence within 2 hours of University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics

Exclusion Criteria

* Any contraindication to a continuous interscalene catheter placement
* Clinically significant pulmonary disease
* Clinically significant cardiac disease
* Allergy to ropivacaine
* Peripheral or central nervous system disease
* Current (or planned) anticoagulation therapy or disease
* Local infection over area of catheter placement
* Renal or hepatic failure
* History of opioid dependence
* Significant psychiatric disease
* Pregnancy or lactation (Subjects will be asked if it is possible they could be pregnant. If a subject responds in the affirmative, a pregnancy test will be done.)
* Seizure Disorder
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

79 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Wisconsin, Madison

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

U of Wisconsin

Madison, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

University of Wisconsin

Madison, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

H-2010-0098

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.