Continuous Infraclavicular Nerve Blocks: Needle Versus Catheter Local Anesthetic Bolus

NCT ID: NCT01377545

Last Updated: 2013-01-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

WITHDRAWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-01-31

Study Completion Date

2013-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The investigators propose to test the hypothesis that when placing a perineural catheter for a continuous peripheral nerve block, injecting the initial local anesthetic bolus via the insertion needle results in a faster-onset sensory block than injecting the initial bolus via the perineural catheter. The study results will help define the optimal local anesthetic bolus introduction technique-needle versus catheter-for peripheral nerve blocks when placing a perineural catheter.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Specific Aim: The investigators propose to test the hypothesis that when placing a perineural catheter for a continuous peripheral nerve block, injecting the initial local anesthetic bolus via the insertion needle results in a faster-onset sensory block than injecting the initial bolus via the perineural catheter. The study results will help define the optimal local anesthetic bolus introduction technique-needle versus catheter-for peripheral nerve blocks when placing a perineural catheter.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Nerve Block

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Local Anesthetic Via Catheter

30mL of Lidocaine (local Anesthetic) will be injected via a perineural catheter at hour 0.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Local Anesthetic given via perineural catheter for infraclavicular nerve block.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Patients will be randomized to receive 30mL of Lidocaine via Catheter for an infraclavicular nerve block on one side (right or left) and via needle on the other side. Sensory and strength will be tested following local anesthetic administration.

Local Anesthetic Via Needle

30mL of Lidocaine (local Anesthetic) will be injected via a needle at hour 0.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Local Anesthetic given via needle for infraclavicular nerve block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Patients will be randomized to receive 30mL of Lidocaine via Catheter for an infraclavicular nerve block on one side (right or left) and via needle on the other side. Sensory and strength will be tested following local anesthetic administration.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Local Anesthetic given via perineural catheter for infraclavicular nerve block.

Patients will be randomized to receive 30mL of Lidocaine via Catheter for an infraclavicular nerve block on one side (right or left) and via needle on the other side. Sensory and strength will be tested following local anesthetic administration.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Local Anesthetic given via needle for infraclavicular nerve block

Patients will be randomized to receive 30mL of Lidocaine via Catheter for an infraclavicular nerve block on one side (right or left) and via needle on the other side. Sensory and strength will be tested following local anesthetic administration.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* age ≥ 18 years
* willing to have bilateral infraclavicular blocks/catheters placed

Exclusion Criteria

* current daily analgesic use
* opioid use within the previous 4 weeks
* any neuro-muscular deficit of either upper extremity
* body mass index \> 30 kg/m2
* weight \< 50 kg \[100 lbs\]
* pregnancy
* incarceration
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of California, San Diego

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Brian M. Ilfeld, MD, MS

Associate Professor, In Residence

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Brian M Ilfeld, M.D., M.S.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of California, San Diego

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

UCSD CTRI, Hillcrest

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Infraclav Needle vs Catheter

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

A Study of Contralateral Limb Block
NCT06045936 RECRUITING PHASE4