Efficacy of the InterX 5000 in the Treatment of Chronic Neck Pain
NCT ID: NCT01382537
Last Updated: 2014-07-25
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
89 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2008-01-31
2010-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Hypothesis 1: InterX therapy alone will have a moderate effect to reduce pain during weeks 1-2.
Hypothesis 2: Functional gains will be greater in patients receiving InterX therapy compared to those who received placebo treatment.
Hypothesis 3: Chronic neck and shoulder pain is more prevalent in patients who exhibit radiographic evidence of degenerative spondylosis/arthrosis of the cervical spine.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Proposal to Evaluate the Efficacy of the InterX 5000 in the Treatment of Chronic Neck and Shoulder Pain
NCT00587626
Chiropractic Care, Medication, and Self-Care for Neck Pain
NCT00029770
Concurrent Treatment for Patients With Cervical Radiculopathy
NCT03636009
Complementary Management of Chronic Neck and/or Low Back Pain With a Pain Relief Kit
NCT03157544
Effectiveness of Dermoneuromodulation Techniques in Patients With Non-specific Chronic Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT05893745
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
During the interval of weeks 1-2 patients will have either the InterX treatment/sham alone. Weeks 3-4 will advance the patient adding a standardized rehabilitation exercise program typical for chronic neck patients. During weeks 5-6, the patient will be scheduled for treatment and will use a self-administered InterX treatment ("home" Flex) unit mimicking home care but accounting for compliance issues through attendance being monitored.
Baseline and follow-up assessments will consist of pain scores, NDI, neck fatigue testing, shoulder and arm reach tasks and walking on a treadmill at 2 MPH for 5 minutes (Neck-walk Index, NWI). Neck fatigue testing will consist of prone positioning and extensor muscle exertion against resistance to tolerance at 60% MVC. Myoelectric sensors will be taped to the skin to record muscle activity during fatigue and reach task testing. Electromagnetic sensors will be taped to a swimmers cap worn by the patient and on the skin at T1 over the spine at the shoulder level and S1 at the pelvis during the walk on the treadmill and on the shoulder and arm during reach testing.
Venipuncture will be performed at the evaluation intervals to collect blood samples for quantifying circulating inflammatory cytokines.
Analysis will focus on change in pain scores and inflammatory cytokines over the first two weeks for Hypothesis H1. Primary functional outcomes including neck fatigue and progression through neck rehabilitation exercise will be tested for Hypothesis2. The third hypothesis will be tested in two ways. First, quantification of degenerative changes (e.g.disc narrowing \& osteophyte formation) on x-ray (AP \& Lat screening views) will be contrasted to incidence in the published literature. Second, pain levels at baseline will be stratified into quartiles and compared to quantitative tally of degenerative changes. This data will serve as a basis for determining whether future studies using degenerative change criteria are warranted. Myoelectric activity, fatigue and head-pelvic position data will be used descriptively to assess functional differences from baseline to completion of treatment.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
A
InterX 5000
A computer driven electrical stimulation unit that contains a cutaneous impedance sensor.
B
InterX 5000
Placebo treatment
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
InterX 5000
A computer driven electrical stimulation unit that contains a cutaneous impedance sensor.
InterX 5000
Placebo treatment
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* ages 18-65
* chronic or recurrent neck or shoulder pain
* pain of at least 3 months duration
* willing to sign consent form
* able/willing to comply with treatment schedule
Exclusion Criteria
* clinically significant herniated disc
* spinal fracture
* previous electrical stimulation treatment for this episode
* recent cervical spine or shoulder surgery
* implanted instrumentation/prostheses
* epilepsy
* pregnancy
* recent (3 months) chemotherapy/radiotherapy
* phlebitis
* cortisone use (30 days)
* hypersensitivity to tape used with EMG
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
McMaster University
OTHER
Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
John J Triano
Dr. John J. Triano
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Brennan PC, Triano JJ, McGregor M, Kokjohn K, Hondras MA, Brennan DC. Enhanced neutrophil respiratory burst as a biological marker for manipulation forces: duration of the effect and association with substance P and tumor necrosis factor. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1992 Feb;15(2):83-9.
Godfrey CM, Morgan PP, Schatzker J. A randomized trial of manipulation for low-back pain in a medical setting. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1984 Apr;9(3):301-4. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198404000-00015.
Hurley DA, McDonough SM, Dempster M, Moore AP, Baxter GD. A randomized clinical trial of manipulative therapy and interferential therapy for acute low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Oct 15;29(20):2207-16. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000142234.15437.da.
Pope MH, Phillips RB, Haugh LD, Hsieh CY, MacDonald L, Haldeman S. A prospective randomized three-week trial of spinal manipulation, transcutaneous muscle stimulation, massage and corset in the treatment of subacute low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994 Nov 15;19(22):2571-7. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199411001-00013.
Teodorczyk-Injeyan JA, Injeyan HS, Ruegg R. Spinal manipulative therapy reduces inflammatory cytokines but not substance P production in normal subjects. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2006 Jan;29(1):14-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2005.10.002.
Teodorczyk-Injeyan JA, Triano JJ, McGregor M, Woodhouse L, Injeyan HS. Effect of Interactive Neurostimulation Therapy on Inflammatory Response in Patients With Chronic and Recurrent Mechanical Neck Pain. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2015 Oct;38(8):545-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2015.08.006. Epub 2015 Oct 4.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
072131
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.