LAPLACE-TIMI 57: Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) Assessment With PCSK9 monoclonaL Antibody Inhibition Combined With Statin thErapy

NCT ID: NCT01380730

Last Updated: 2022-11-15

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

631 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-07-01

Study Completion Date

2012-04-05

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To evaluate the effect of 12 weeks of subcutaneous (SC) evolocumab (AMG 145) administered every 2 weeks (Q2W) or every 4 weeks (Q4W), compared with placebo, on percent change from baseline in LDL-C when used in addition to a statin in adults with hypercholesterolemia.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hyperlipidemia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Placebo Q2W

Participants received placebo subcutaneous injection once every 2 weeks (Q2W) for 12 weeks.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo to Evolocumab

Intervention Type OTHER

Administered by subcutaneous injection

Placebo Q4W

Participants received placebo subcutaneous injection once every 4 weeks (Q4W) for 12 weeks.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo to Evolocumab

Intervention Type OTHER

Administered by subcutaneous injection

Evolocumab 70 mg Q2W

Participants received 70 mg evolocumab by subcutaneous injection once every 2 weeks for 12 weeks.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Evolocumab

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Administered by subcutaneous injection

Evolocumab 105 mg Q2W

Participants received 105 mg evolocumab by subcutaneous injection once every 2 weeks for 12 weeks.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Evolocumab

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Administered by subcutaneous injection

Evolocumab 140 mg Q2W

Participants received 140 mg evolocumab by subcutaneous injection once every 2 weeks for 12 weeks.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Evolocumab

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Administered by subcutaneous injection

Evolocumab 280 mg Q4W

Participants received 280 mg evolocumab by subcutaneous injection once every 4 weeks for 12 weeks.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Evolocumab

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Administered by subcutaneous injection

Evolocumab 350 mg Q4W

Participants received 350 mg evolocumab by subcutaneous injection once every 4 weeks for 12 weeks.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Evolocumab

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Administered by subcutaneous injection

Evolocumab 420 mg Q4W

Participants received 420 mg evolocumab by subcutaneous injection once every 4 weeks for 12 weeks.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Evolocumab

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Administered by subcutaneous injection

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Evolocumab

Administered by subcutaneous injection

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Placebo to Evolocumab

Administered by subcutaneous injection

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

AMG 145 Repatha

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Male or female ≥ 18 to ≤ 80 years of age
* On an approved statin, with or without ezetimibe, with stable dose(s) for at least 4 weeks
* Fasting LDL-C ≥ 85 mg/dL
* Fasting triglycerides ≤ 400 mg/dL

Exclusion Criteria

* Myocardial infarction, unstable angina, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) or stroke within 3 months prior to randomization
* Type 1 diabetes; newly diagnosed or poorly controlled type 2 diabetes (Glycosyated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) \> 8.5%)
* Uncontrolled hypertension
* New York Heart Association (NYHA) III or IV heart failure, or known left ventricular ejection fraction \< 30%
* Uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmia
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

The TIMI Study Group

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Amgen

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Amgen

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Research Site

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Malvern, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Anaheim, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Carmichael, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Newport Beach, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Roseville, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Westlake Village, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Littleton, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Daytona Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Green Cove Springs, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Melbourne, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Port Charlotte, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Peoria, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Hammond, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Valparaiso, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Iowa City, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Lexington, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Auburn, Maine, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Bangor, Maine, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Portland, Maine, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Kalamazoo, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Marquette, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Ypsilanti, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Tupelo, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Great Falls, Montana, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Voorhees Township, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Cortlandt Manor, New York, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Williamsville, New York, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Smithfield, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Canton, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Dayton, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Mansfield, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Marion, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Sandusky, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Camp Hill, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Research Site

York, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Florence, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Spartanburg, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Rapid City, South Dakota, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Jackson, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Jackson, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Tacoma, Washington, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Madison, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Victoria, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Cambridge, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Greater Sudbury, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

London, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

London, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Newmarket, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Oshawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Oshawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Sarnia, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Scarborough Village, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Woodstock, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Gatineau, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Lachine, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Longueuil, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Pointe-Claire, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Québec, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Brno, , Czechia

Site Status

Research Site

Brno, , Czechia

Site Status

Research Site

Brno, , Czechia

Site Status

Research Site

Olomouc, , Czechia

Site Status

Research Site

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Research Site

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Research Site

Slaný, , Czechia

Site Status

Research Site

Svitavy, , Czechia

Site Status

Research Site

Ústí nad Orlicí, , Czechia

Site Status

Research Site

Znojmo, , Czechia

Site Status

Research Site

Aalborg, , Denmark

Site Status

Research Site

Ballerup Municipality, , Denmark

Site Status

Research Site

Vejle, , Denmark

Site Status

Research Site

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Debrecen, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Dunaújváros, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Eger, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Gyula, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Kecskemét, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Komárom, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Mosonmagyaróvár, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Szolnok, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Zalaegerszeg, , Hungary

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Canada Czechia Denmark Hungary

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Giugliano RP, Desai NR, Kohli P, Rogers WJ, Somaratne R, Huang F, Liu T, Mohanavelu S, Hoffman EB, McDonald ST, Abrahamsen TE, Wasserman SM, Scott R, Sabatine MS; LAPLACE-TIMI 57 Investigators. Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of a monoclonal antibody to proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 in combination with a statin in patients with hypercholesterolaemia (LAPLACE-TIMI 57): a randomised, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging, phase 2 study. Lancet. 2012 Dec 8;380(9858):2007-17. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61770-X. Epub 2012 Nov 6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23141813 (View on PubMed)

Kohli P, Desai NR, Giugliano RP, Kim JB, Somaratne R, Huang F, Knusel B, McDonald S, Abrahamsen T, Wasserman SM, Scott R, Sabatine MS. Design and rationale of the LAPLACE-TIMI 57 trial: a phase II, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the efficacy and tolerability of a monoclonal antibody inhibitor of PCSK9 in subjects with hypercholesterolemia on background statin therapy. Clin Cardiol. 2012;35(7):385-91. doi: 10.1002/clc.22014. Epub 2012 Jun 19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22714699 (View on PubMed)

Desai NR, Kohli P, Giugliano RP, O'Donoghue ML, Somaratne R, Zhou J, Hoffman EB, Huang F, Rogers WJ, Wasserman SM, Scott R, Sabatine MS. AMG145, a monoclonal antibody against proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin type 9, significantly reduces lipoprotein(a) in hypercholesterolemic patients receiving statin therapy: an analysis from the LDL-C Assessment with Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin Kexin Type 9 Monoclonal Antibody Inhibition Combined with Statin Therapy (LAPLACE)-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 57 trial. Circulation. 2013 Aug 27;128(9):962-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.001969. Epub 2013 Jul 24.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 23884353 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.amgentrials.com

AmgenTrials clinical trials website

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

20101155

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.