Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
WITHDRAWN
PHASE4
INTERVENTIONAL
2011-06-30
2012-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparative Evaluation of the McGrath Videolaryngoscope and the Direct Laryngoscopy for Tracheal Intubation in the Prehospital Setting
NCT04930419
McGrath Mac Videolaryngoscope Versus Macintosh Laryngoscope for Orotracheal Intubation in Critical Care Unit
NCT02413723
McGrath Video Laryngoscope for All Intubations in the Operating Room
NCT05850260
Comparison of GlideScope Videolaryngoscopy to Direct Laryngoscopy for Nasal Intubation
NCT00400972
GlideScope® vs GlideScope® + aScope® for Managing Difficult Airways.
NCT02627755
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Objectives: compare the emergency intubation in Pre hospital meadow by Glide Scope Ranger with regard to the classic method
Progress of the study: the patients will be included by emergency physicians working in out of hospital teams of 3 major hospitals of Paris. The patients will be randomized in 2 groups: 1 group classic laryngoscopy (group 1) and a group Glide scope Ranger (group 2). The score IDS will be compared for every group as well as the arisen of a complication during the procedure. The consent will be collected on the place or during the hospitalization.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1: Classical intubation
Classical intubation
Classical intubation
2: Glidescope intubation
GLIDESCOPE
GLIDESCOPE intubation
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Classical intubation
Classical intubation
GLIDESCOPE
GLIDESCOPE intubation
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* requiring an intubation
* by medical out of hospital emergency operators
* medical insurance
* Consent signed
Exclusion Criteria
* Refusal of consent or inability for understanding study
* small mouth opening makes it impossible intubate
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ministry of Health, France
OTHER_GOV
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Sébastien GALLULA, Ph
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Patrick PLAISANCE, MD, PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2010-A01512-37
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
P100205
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.