Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
45 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-01-31
2016-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Patients admit to the operation rooms of University of Naples "Federico II" and requiring endotracheal intubation for general anesthesia will be consecutively screened for the presence of predicted difficult airway according Italian guideline. According to this guideline, the presence of one or more of the following parameters may be considered highly predictive of difficult intubation: Mallampati class 3-4, inter-incisor distance \< 30 mm, mental-thyroidal distance \< 60 mm, large prominence of superior incisors above inferior incisors uncorrectable with jaw-thrust, reduced head and neck motility, and reduced mental-jugular distance. Patients matching more then 1 of the previous criteria stated by Italian guideline will be included in this case controlled study. Patients 1) without criteria for predicted difficult airway; 2) those requiring emergency surgery; 3) aged \< 18 years; or 4) declined consent to participate, will be excluded from this study.The primary end-point was the comparison of the intubation difficulty scale (IDS) score. The secondary end-points were the learning curve, the intubation time, the Cormack and Lehane score view, and the need for maneuvers to aid the endotracheal intubation comparing different videolaryngoscopes available in our department. Two anesthesiologists with 10 years of experience in conventional endotracheal intubation and trained for video assisted intubation will perform the maneuvers.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Learning and Performance of Glidescope® Videolaryngoscope Intubation
NCT01790646
Airway Injuries After Intubation Using Videolaryngoscopy Versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Adult Patients Requiring Tracheal Intubation
NCT03613103
Prehospital Tracheal Intubation Technique Using Initial Direct Laryngoscopy During Videolaryngoscopy
NCT06918717
UED-A Videolaryngoscope vs. Glidescope Titanium for Elective Tracheal Intubation
NCT05721690
Use of a Low-cost Video Laryngoscope on Manikin
NCT06176677
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
endotracheal intubation with Imago V-blade
Patients in this arm will receive endotracheal intubation with the Imago V-Blade videolaryngoscopes.
Imago V-Balde
the endotracheal intubation will be performed with videolaryngoscopes (imago V-Blade) according to the user manual
endotracheal intubation with Glidescope
Patients in this arm will receive endotracheal intubation with the glidescope videolaryngoscopes.
Glidescope
the endotracheal intubation will be performed with videolaryngoscopes (Glidescope) according to the user manual
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Imago V-Balde
the endotracheal intubation will be performed with videolaryngoscopes (imago V-Blade) according to the user manual
Glidescope
the endotracheal intubation will be performed with videolaryngoscopes (Glidescope) according to the user manual
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Mallampati class 3-4
* inter-incisor distance \< 30 mm
* mental-thyroidal distance \< 60 mm
* large prominence of superior incisors above inferior incisors uncorrectable with jaw-thrust -reduced head and neck motility
* reduced mental-jugular distance.
Exclusion Criteria
* emergency surgery
* age \< 18 years
* declined consent to participate
18 Years
77 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Federico II University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Maria Vargas
MD
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Naples Federico II department of Anesthesia and Critical Care
Naples, Italy, Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Vargas M, Pastore A, Aloj F, Laffey JG, Servillo G. A comparison of videolaryngoscopes for tracheal intubation in predicted difficult airway: a feasibility study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2017 Feb 20;17(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12871-017-0318-2.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Airway1
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.