Are Patients Willing and Capable of Removing Their Own Non-absorbable Sutures
NCT ID: NCT01372488
Last Updated: 2021-10-12
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
160 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-04-30
2010-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
If patients who are sutured with non-absorbable sutures in the Emergency Department (ED) are provided with the proper equipment and knowledge on how to remove their own sutures, they will be willing and capable of removing their own sutures.
2. Primary and Secondary Questions
Primary Question What number of patients in the study group will successfully remove their own sutures if they are provided with the equipment and information on how to do so compared with a control group who are treated and advised in the usual fashion? (follow up with family doctor or local medical clinic for suture removal)
Secondary Questions
1. Number of complications related to self removal of sutures as compared to traditional treatment. Complications measured were wound infections, dehiscence and prolonged bleeding (\>30 min)
2. Number of physician visits related to self removal of sutures as compared to traditional treatment.
3. Patient satisfaction and comfort level related to self removal of sutures as compared with traditional treatment.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Absorbable or Non Absorbable Sutures in Hand Surgery
NCT04812275
Comparison of Cosmetic Outcomes of Lacerations Repaired Using Absorbable Versus Non-absorbable Sutures
NCT00933829
Optimizing Postpartum Pelvic Health Through Self-Scar Tissue Massage of Episiotomy and Perineal Scar Tissue A Pilot RCT
NCT05908292
Comparison of Staples Versus Prolene Suture for Skin Closure at Cesarean Delivery
NCT01509950
Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Needle Aspiration and Open Incision and Drainage for Cutaneous Abscesses
NCT01186900
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Patients who are sutured with non-absorbable sutures in the Emergency Department are asked to follow up with their family doctor or local medical clinic for suture removal. Suture removal, especially for simple lacerations is easy to do. Given the proper instructions and equipment suture removal could be done by the patient or a family member.
Objectives:
Are patients willing and capable of removing their own non-absorbable sutures? How many patients can successfully self remove their own sutures if given the proper equipment and instructions as compared with patients who are not given equipment and instructions? Would patient self removal result in less physician visits related to sutured wounds? What would be the complication rate for self removal of sutures be? Specific complications were wound infection, dehiscence and prolonged bleeding? Would patients be satisfied and comfortable in taking out their own sutures?
Methods:
Patients who are sutured with non absorbable sutures in the emergency department will be randomly enrolled into either of two groups. One group will receive wound care instructions alone. The second group will be given wound care instructions, a suture removal kit and instructions regarding self-removal to take home. Both groups will be contacted by telephone 14 days after suturing and asked questions concerning who removed their sutures, number of physician visits, time loss from work related to suture removal and complications related to sutures or suture removal. Questions regarding patient satisfaction with respect to self removal of sutures will also be asked.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Study group
Study group will be provided with suture removal instructions and suture removal kit and asked to consider removing their own sutures
Suture self removal
Suture self removal
Control group
Control group will be asked to have their sutures removed as they normally would (see family doctor or clinic)
Suture removal by family doctor or clinic
As above
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Suture self removal
Suture self removal
Suture removal by family doctor or clinic
As above
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Complicated lacerations or lacerations which require close medical supervision
* Lacerations that are inaccessible to the patient (ie. scalp, back or buttock lacerations)
* Inability to contact patient by telephone for follow-up (no telephone, patient travelling out of country etc.)
* Patients who are immunocompromised, have diabetes mellitus or are on steroid medications
19 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of British Columbia
OTHER
Fraser Health
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Peter MacDonald
Emergency Physician
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Peter J Macdonald, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Royal Columbian Hospital Department of Emergency Medicine, New Westminster, BC, Canada
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Royal Columbian and Eagle Ridge Hospitals
New Westminster, British Columbia, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Albert, M., Daly, A., Krueger, J., Krueger, K., Meeusen, C., Vogelheim, C., & Jones, J. (2009). 421: Self-removal of sutures by emergency department patients. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 54(3S), 133-133.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2010-004
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.