Continuous Versus Interrupted Sutures for Repair of Episiotomy or Second Degree Tears: a Randomised Controlled Trial
NCT ID: NCT00777270
Last Updated: 2008-10-22
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
445 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2005-09-30
2007-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1 continuous
continuous suture technique with continuous non-locking suture in the vagina, perineum and subcutaneous tissue.
repair of episiotomy or second degree tears
continuous suture technique with continuous non-locking suture in the vagina, perineum and subcutaneous tissue.
repair of episiotomy or second degree tears
interrupted technique with continuous locking suture of the vagina, interrupted sutures in the perineum muscle and interrupted transcutaneous suture
2 interrupted
interrupted technique with continuous locking suture of the vagina, interrupted sutures in the perineum muscle and interrupted transcutaneous suture
repair of episiotomy or second degree tears
interrupted technique with continuous locking suture of the vagina, interrupted sutures in the perineum muscle and interrupted transcutaneous suture
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
repair of episiotomy or second degree tears
continuous suture technique with continuous non-locking suture in the vagina, perineum and subcutaneous tissue.
repair of episiotomy or second degree tears
interrupted technique with continuous locking suture of the vagina, interrupted sutures in the perineum muscle and interrupted transcutaneous suture
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* at least 37 weeks of gestation
* assistance by one of the 4 matrons who participated in the project
* have been subjected to an episiotomy or the appearance of tearing that affected skin and muscle
* The newborn child had to be alive, viable
Exclusion Criteria
* produce injury in the anal sphincter or in the rectum.
* serious congenital malformations.
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hospital Universitario Principe de Asturias
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Fundación Hospital Principe de Asturias
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Pedro Valenzuela, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hospital Prínicpe de Asturias
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Fundación Hospital Príncipe de Asturias
Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Kettle C, Hills RK, Jones P, Darby L, Gray R, Johanson R. Continuous versus interrupted perineal repair with standard or rapidly absorbed sutures after spontaneous vaginal birth: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2002 Jun 29;359(9325):2217-23. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09312-1.
Fleming N. Can the suturing method make a difference in postpartum perineal pain? J Nurse Midwifery. 1990 Jan-Feb;35(1):19-25. doi: 10.1016/0091-2182(90)90053-8.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
FIS-PI051023
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id