A Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety With Solifenacin Succinate to Improve Urinary Continence After Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

NCT ID: NCT01371994

Last Updated: 2024-11-21

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

640 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-08-02

Study Completion Date

2013-10-21

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of 12 weeks of treatment of solifenacin succinate versus placebo in participants who are incontinent after Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.

This study will also assess the effect of 12 weeks of treatment with solifenacin succinate versus placebo on quality of life (QOL) as measured by questionnaires.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The study duration includes a 14-day treatment free wash-out period. The maximum total study duration is 15 weeks (2-3 week screening/washout period and a 12 week treatment period). The Baseline, Week 4, and Week 8 visits will be telephone contact visits.

Participants will complete an electronic daily pad use diary during the study

duration. Participants will also be asked to complete several questionnaires during the study.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Urinary Incontinence

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Solifenacin succinate

Participants received 5 mg solifenacin succinate tablets once a day for 12 weeks. At week 4, based on efficacy and safety and in agreement with the investigator, the dose might be increased to 10 mg (2 tablets of 5 mg) once daily.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

solifenacin succinate

Intervention Type DRUG

oral

Placebo

Participants received matching placebo tablets once a day for 12 weeks.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

oral

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

solifenacin succinate

oral

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

oral

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Vesicare YM905

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Ambulatory
* Willing and able to complete the daily pad use diary,

American Urology Association Symptom Score (AUASS) with Bother Score, the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Short Form (ICIQ-SF), and the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI)

* Has not used any medication for over-active bladder symptoms for at least 14 days prior to enrollment
* Diagnosed with prostate cancer, treated by Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy, is voiding spontaneously and has urinary incontinence one week after removal of the indwelling catheter which requires management with 2 to 10 pads inclusive per day (24 hour days) for 7 consecutive days

Exclusion Criteria

* Evidence of severe neurologic damage post-prostatectomy
* Evidence of chronic urologic inflammation such as interstitial cystitis and bladder stone; uncontrolled narrow angle glaucoma; urinary or gastric retention or neurogenic bladder
* Symptomatic for urinary tract infection or has a urine culture result which requires treatment as determined by the investigator.
* Clinically significant history of hepatic or renal impairment (2 X Upper Limit of Normal (ULN) values in alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or creatinine clearance \< 30 ml/min)
* History of diagnosed gastrointestinal obstruction disease
* Any prior history of local radiation therapy to the prostate or rectum or any prior hormonal therapy or has planned such therapy during study conduct
* Known or suspected hypersensitivity to solifenacin succinate, any components, or other anticholinergics
* Treated with any investigational drug within last 30 days
* History of a clinically significant illness or medical condition that would preclude participation in the study
* Diagnosed with New York Heart Association Class III and IV heart failure
* Any of the following peri-operative laboratory results: ALT \> 2.0 ULN, AST \> 2.0 ULN, serum creatinine \> 1.5 mg/L, blood glucose \> 130 mg/dL, blood urea nitrogen (BUN) \> 23 mg/dL.
* Severe hypertension on peri-operative evaluation which is defined as a sitting systolic blood pressure \> 180 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure \> 110 mmHg, and which is not corrected
* Electrolytes (sodium, potassium, chloride or bicarbonate) that are not in normal range and clinically significant as determined by the investigator in the perioperative period. Can be eligible if electrolytes are corrected to within normal range prior to randomization
* Participated in any interventional clinical study or has been treated with any investigational drugs within 30 days or 5 half lives, whichever is longer, prior to the initiation of Screening.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Astellas Pharma Inc

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Medical Director

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Astellas Pharma Global Development

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Urology Centers of Alabama

Homewood, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Alaska Clinical Research Center

Anchorage, Alaska, United States

Site Status

Urological Associates of Southern Arizona

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

University of California, San Diego Moores Cancer Center

La Jolla, California, United States

Site Status

Tower Urology

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Radiological Associates of Sacramento Medical Group, Inc.

Sacramento, California, United States

Site Status

Urology Center of Colorado

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Urology Associates

Englewood, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Advanced Urology

Parker, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Connecticut Clinical Research Center

Middlebury, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Grove Hill Medical Center

New Britain, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Urologic Surgeons of Washington

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

University of Florida

Gainesville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Urology Research Network

Hialeah, Florida, United States

Site Status

East Coast Institute for Research

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Winter Park Urology Associates

Orlando, Florida, United States

Site Status

Southeastern Research Group

Tallahassee, Florida, United States

Site Status

Northwestern University

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Springfield Clinic

Springfield, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Northeast Indiana Research

Fort Wayne, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Urology of Indiana

Greenwood, Indiana, United States

Site Status

The University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics

Iowa City, Iowa, United States

Site Status

The Iowa Clinic

West Des Moines, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Tulane University School of Medicine, Department of Urology

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Lahey Clinic Medical Center

Burlington, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Henry Ford Hospital

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Spectrum Health Medical Group

Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Adult and Pediatric Urology Group

Sartell, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Five Valley Urology

Missoula, Montana, United States

Site Status

South Nevada Aids Research

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

AdvanceMed Research

Lawrenceville, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Delaware Valley Urology

Mount Laurel, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Robert Wood Johnson Medical School

New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Community Care Physicians PC

Albany, New York, United States

Site Status

Brooklyn Urology Research Group

Brooklyn, New York, United States

Site Status

University Urology Associates

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Hudson Valley Urology, PC

Poughkeepsie, New York, United States

Site Status

University of Rochester Medical Center

Rochester, New York, United States

Site Status

AMP Urology

Syracuse, New York, United States

Site Status

Cary Urology

Cary, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Associated Urologists of North Carolina

Raleigh, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

The Urology Group

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Cleveland Clinic

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Romius Institute of Northwest Ohio

Toledo, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Oregon Health and Science University

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Urologic Consultants of Southeastern Pennsylvania

Bala-Cynwyd, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Pharma Resources

East Providence, Rhode Island, United States

Site Status

Academic Urologists

Chattanooga, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Volunteer Research Group

Knoxville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Southeast Urology Network

Memphis, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Urology Clinics of North Texas

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Methodist Hospital Research Institute

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Methodist Urology Associates

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Urology San Antonio Research

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Virginia Mason Medical Center

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Swedish Urology Group

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

CAMC Institute Clinical Trial Center

Charleston, West Virginia, United States

Site Status

University of Wisconsin Hospital

Madison, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

The Prostate Centre, Diamond Health Care Centre

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

University Health Network/ Princess Margaret Hospital

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Canada

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

https://astellasclinicalstudyresults.com/study.aspx?ID=253

Link to results on the Astellas Clinical Study Results website.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

905-UC-050

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.