Safety And Efficacy Of Solifenacin In Men With Overactive Bladder (OAB) And Detrusor Underactivity

NCT ID: NCT00441428

Last Updated: 2008-06-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Detrusor underactivity (DUA) in men is responsible for LUTS in a significant minority, the symptoms being indistinguishable from those seen in BOO. The International Continence Society (ICS) defines DUA as 'a detrusor contraction of inadequate magnitude and/or duration to effect complete bladder emptying in the absence of urethral obstruction. Whilst a reduced maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) is indicative of voiding dysfunction, flow studies cannot distinguish between DUA and BOO, which are the two principal causes of low flow rates. DUA is diagnosed from a pressure-flow study (PFS)and is characterized by a low-pressure, poorly sustained, or wave-like detrusor contraction with an associated poor flow rate.

Overactive bladder (OAB) is the most common term currently used in clinical medicine to describe a complex of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) with or without incontinence but most commonly consisting of urgency, frequency, nocturia, troublesome or incomplete emptying,and, occasionally, pain. With the exception of pain and incontinence, these symptoms are often found together; thus, the term LUTS has come to replace previous terms, such as urgency-frequency syndrome,urethral syndrome, and prostatism.

Drug treatment is frequently used as the initial management approach for LUTS in older men.Among men who desire treatment, general practice prescribing data have shown that antimuscarinics are not often given to elderly men. There is theoretical concern that the inhibitory effect of antimuscarinics on detrusor contraction could aggravate voiding difficulties or cause urinary retention in patients with BOO. There are virtually no data evaluating the safety and efficacy of solifenacin treatment in men with DUA and OAB.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Overactive Bladder Detrusor Underactivity

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

solifenacin

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Men aged \> 40 years were eligible if by 7-day bladder diary they had urinary frequency (8 or more micturitions per 24 hours) and urgency, with or without urgency incontinence (1 or more episodes per 24 hours) together with coexistence low detrusor contractility.

Exclusion Criteria

* Urinary tract infection,
* Bladder stone, urogenital tumors,
* Prostate surgery,
* Use of indwelling catheter or self-catheterization program,
* Medications that could affect the lower urinary tract function,
* History of neurological disease,
* Acute urinary retention or any condition for which antimuscarinic was contraindicated.
* Antimuscarinic, antispasmodic, or electrostimulation within 1 month;
* Any investigational drug within 2 months; or
* A 5a-reductase inhibitor within 3 months of screening.
Minimum Eligible Age

40 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of L'Aquila

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Piero Ronchi, M.D

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of L'Aquila

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of L'Aquila

L’Aquila, Abruzzo, Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

UDASOL-1520

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id