Incontinence & Intimate Partners: Assessing the Contribution of Treatment

NCT ID: NCT01559389

Last Updated: 2019-12-02

Basic Information

• Recruitment Status: COMPLETED
• Clinical Phase: PHASE4
• Total Enrollment: 138 participants
• Study Classification: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Start Date: 2012-03-09
• Study Completion Date: 2017-06-29

Brief Summary

Urge urinary incontinence (UUI) is a socially debilitating disease due to its inherently unpredictable nature and sometimes large volumes of urine loss. Women with UUI may experience anxiety over public episodes of incontinence and concerns about odor and, as a result, isolate themselves socially. This isolation affects both partners in the relationship and may be a source of discord. The impact of UUI also moves into personal relationships where fears or actual episodes of incontinence during physical intimacy, including but limited to intercourse, may result in limited interactions and changes in the relationship satisfaction for both partners. Few studies have examined the role of urinary incontinence, particularly UUI, in the dynamics of an intimate partner relationship and none have evaluated the impact of successful UUI treatment.

The long-term goal of our research is to understand the social and emotional impact of pelvic floor disorders, particularly UUI, on the well-being of an intimate relationship. Ultimately, we aim to evaluate the role that successful treatment plays in the alleviation of discord in intimate partner relationships that are affected by UUI and other pelvic floor disorders.

Our objective for this proposal is to characterize, using validated, quantifiable methods the quality of the relationship in couples affected by UUI and to identify the role that treatment plays in improving this relationship. Our central hypothesis is that UUI has a negative impact upon the emotional and physical well-being of a relationship and that effective treatment will result in improvement in areas of the relationship that have been detrimentally affected by UUI. Our rationale for this study is that an understanding of UUI in the context of a couple, particularly from the perspective of the male partner, will improve our ability to holistically treat UUI, thus improving patient outcomes and satisfaction.

Detailed Description

Chronic illness places emotional, physical, and financial burdens upon both the patient and her partner and can be a significant source of stress in a relationship. The symptoms of UUI inherently pose greater social challenges than those faced by women other forms of pelvic floor disorders. For example, women with UUI may avoid social situations due to fear of having an accident or may be reluctant to participate in activities during which it may be difficult to find a bathroom. The resulting social isolation impacts both members of the dyad and may serve as a source of relationship discord. Changes in sexual function and perceived intimacy, including non-intercourse intimacy, as well as communication may be new sources of stress in a previously healthy relationship or may serve to amplify pre-existing relationship problems.

Sexual function is another area in which UUI may cause a negative impact. Studies of coital incontinence among incontinent clinic populations report prevalence ranging from 10%-56% with a median of 22%. The prevalence of coital incontinence may be related to the type of incontinence as well as the severity of symptoms. Stress incontinence has been associated with leakage of urine during intercourse, while detrusor instability and urge incontinence have been correlated with leakage during orgasm. A cross-sectional study of women with UUI and urinary incontinence found that among women reporting low sexual desire, stress incontinence was common (47%), while 46% of women reporting orgasmic phase dysfunction reported symptoms of urge incontinence. Qualitative data corroborates the negative impact of UUI on dyadic and sexual relations.

Another mechanism by which UUI may affect satisfaction with dyadic relations is through depressive symptomatology. Urinary incontinence is associated with a decrease in overall health-related quality of life and is positively correlated with depression, anxiety, and stress. Studies of other chronic illnesses demonstrate a correlation between the patient's level of depression and that of their spouse; level of depression shows an inverse relationship with degree of satisfaction with the relationship.

One of the two studies in the published literature that use quantitative methods to evaluate the impact of urodynamic stress incontinence and detrusor overactivity on the marital relationship concluded that both sexual function and marital relationships are negatively affected by incontinence. This study, like others, is based upon the perspective of the female partner. A recent study of Swedish women with urinary incontinence and urgency is the only study which includes the perspective of the male partner to examine the impact of UUI on the relationship. It concludes that, "Female urinary incontinence, urgency and frequency significantly impair the quality of life in both younger and older women, and also have negative effects on the partner relationship and the partner's life".

The perspective of intimate partners of women with UUI and other forms of PFD is largely missing from the literature. Any analysis of the role of UUI in intimate partner relationships is incomplete without this perspective.

Conditions

Urge Urinary Incontinence

Study Design

• Allocation Method: NON_RANDOMIZED
• Intervention Model: SINGLE_GROUP
• Primary Study Purpose: SUPPORTIVE_CARE
• Blinding Strategy: NONE

Study Groups

Female Partners

This arm comprises female partners who receive up to 16 weeks of solifenacin treatment for their UUI symptoms

Group Type: EXPERIMENTAL

Solifenacin

Intervention Type: DRUG

Women presenting with UUI symptoms receive 5 to 10 milligrams (mg) of daily solifenacin for up to 16 weeks

Male Partners

This arm comprises healthy male partners

Group Type: NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Solifenacin

Women presenting with UUI symptoms receive 5 to 10 milligrams (mg) of daily solifenacin for up to 16 weeks

Intervention Type: DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Vesicare

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

• Age ≥ 18 years
• In a relationship with a male partner for at least 3 months
• Not pregnant or planning to become pregnant
• Have a diagnosis of UUI or Mixed Urinary Incontinence (MUI) that is urge predominant based on a 3 day voiding diary
• Are interested in medical management of their symptoms
• Are candidates for solifenacin
• Are able to provide informed consent
• Are able to complete written questionnaires.

Exclusion Criteria

• Post Voided Residual (PVR) > 200 ml at the initial visit
• History of a significant outflow obstruction
• History of persistent/recurrent Urinary Tract Infection (UTI)
• History of bladder stones
• History of a diagnosis of chronic interstitial cystitis
• History of pelvic irradiation
• Current pelvic malignancy
• Narrow angle glaucoma
• Urinary or gastric retention
• Current use of a tricyclic antidepressant
• A neurologic diagnosis that could affect bladder function
• History of chronic pelvic pain
• Active psychotic disorder
• Male partner does not speak English
• Declines permission for the study team to recruit their male partner for the study

• Minimum Eligible Age: 18 Years
• Eligible Sex: ALL
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: Yes

Sponsors

Astellas Pharma US, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role: collaborator

Loyola University

OTHER

Sponsor Role: lead

Responsible Party

Elizabeth Mueller

Associate Professor

Responsibility Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Elizabeth Meuller, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Loyola University

Locations

Loyola University Medical Center

Maywood, Illinois, United States

Countries

United States

References

Shaw C. A systematic review of the literature on the prevalence of sexual impairment in women with urinary incontinence and the prevalence of urinary leakage during sexual activity. Eur Urol. 2002 Nov;42(5):432-40. doi: 10.1016/s0302-2838(02)00401-3.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 12429150 (View on PubMed)

Hilton P. Urinary incontinence during sexual intercourse: a common, but rarely volunteered, symptom. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1988 Apr;95(4):377-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1988.tb06609.x.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 3382610 (View on PubMed)

Salonia A, Zanni G, Nappi RE, Briganti A, Deho F, Fabbri F, Colombo R, Guazzoni G, Di Girolamo V, Rigatti P, Montorsi F. Sexual dysfunction is common in women with lower urinary tract symptoms and urinary incontinence: results of a cross-sectional study. Eur Urol. 2004 May;45(5):642-8; discussion 648. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2003.11.023.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 15082208 (View on PubMed)

Coyne KS, Matza LS, Brewster-Jordan J. "We have to stop again?!": The impact of overactive bladder on family members. Neurourol Urodyn. 2009;28(8):969-75. doi: 10.1002/nau.20705.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 19301410 (View on PubMed)

Bovbjerg VE, Trowbridge ER, Barber MD, Martirosian TE, Steers WD, Hullfish KL. Patient-centered treatment goals for pelvic floor disorders: association with quality-of-life and patient satisfaction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 May;200(5):568.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.11.020. Epub 2009 Feb 23.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 19236871 (View on PubMed)

Coyne KS, Wein AJ, Tubaro A, Sexton CC, Thompson CL, Kopp ZS, Aiyer LP. The burden of lower urinary tract symptoms: evaluating the effect of LUTS on health-related quality of life, anxiety and depression: EpiLUTS. BJU Int. 2009 Apr;103 Suppl 3:4-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08371.x.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 19302497 (View on PubMed)

Litman HJ, Steers WD, Wei JT, Kupelian V, Link CL, McKinlay JB; Boston Area Community Health Survey Investigators. Relationship of lifestyle and clinical factors to lower urinary tract symptoms: results from Boston Area Community Health survey. Urology. 2007 Nov;70(5):916-21. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.06.1117. Epub 2007 Oct 24.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 17919693 (View on PubMed)

Daneker B, Kimmel PL, Ranich T, Peterson RA. Depression and marital dissatisfaction in patients with end-stage renal disease and in their spouses. Am J Kidney Dis. 2001 Oct;38(4):839-46. doi: 10.1053/ajkd.2001.27704.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 11576888 (View on PubMed)

Yip SK, Chan A, Pang S, Leung P, Tang C, Shek D, Chung T. The impact of urodynamic stress incontinence and detrusor overactivity on marital relationship and sexual function. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 May;188(5):1244-8. doi: 10.1067/mob.2003.273.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 12748492 (View on PubMed)

Nilsson M, Lalos A, Lalos O. The impact of female urinary incontinence and urgency on quality of life and partner relationship. Neurourol Urodyn. 2009;28(8):976-81. doi: 10.1002/nau.20709.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 19229955 (View on PubMed)

Barber MD, Walters MD, Bump RC. Short forms of two condition-specific quality-of-life questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Jul;193(1):103-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.12.025.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 16021067 (View on PubMed)

Herzog AR, Diokno AC, Brown MB, Normolle DP, Brock BM. Two-year incidence, remission, and change patterns of urinary incontinence in noninstitutionalized older adults. J Gerontol. 1990 Mar;45(2):M67-74. doi: 10.1093/geronj/45.2.m67.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 2313045 (View on PubMed)

Rogers RG, Coates KW, Kammerer-Doak D, Khalsa S, Qualls C. A short form of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12). Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2003 Aug;14(3):164-8; discussion 168. doi: 10.1007/s00192-003-1063-2. Epub 2003 Jul 25.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 12955337 (View on PubMed)

Rust J, Golombok S. The Golombok-Rust Inventory of Sexual Satisfaction (GRISS). Br J Clin Psychol. 1985 Feb;24 ( Pt 1):63-4. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1985.tb01314.x.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 3971070 (View on PubMed)

Spanier GB. The measurement of marital quality. J Sex Marital Ther. 1979 Fall;5(3):288-300. doi: 10.1080/00926237908403734.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 513146 (View on PubMed)

Johnson SM, Greenberg LS. Differential effects of experiential and problem-solving interventions in resolving marital conflict. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1985 Apr;53(2):175-84. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.53.2.175. No abstract available.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 3998245 (View on PubMed)

Jacobson NS. A component analysis of behavioral marital therapy: the relative effectiveness of behavior exchange and communication/problem-solving training. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1984 Apr;52(2):295-305. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.52.2.295. No abstract available.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 6715653 (View on PubMed)

Jacobson NS, Follette WC, McDonald DW. Reactivity to positive and negative behavior in distressed and nondistressed married couples. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1982 Oct;50(5):706-14. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.50.5.706. No abstract available.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 7142544 (View on PubMed)

Nathan EP, Joanning HH. Enhancing marital sexuality: an evaluation of a program for the sexual enrichment of normal couples. J Sex Marital Ther. 1985 Fall;11(3):157-64. doi: 10.1080/00926238508405441.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 4068043 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

203952

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id