Study of VESIcare® In Overactive Bladder (OAB) Subjects to Evaluate Symptom Bother and Health Related Quality of Life

NCT ID: NCT00573508

Last Updated: 2010-10-05

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

768 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-08-31

Study Completion Date

2008-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Evaluate the effect of VESIcare® on symptom bother for subjects with OAB

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Phase 4, multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study. All subjects that meet the baseline criteria will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio into VESIcare® (solifenacin succinate) or placebo group.

The study duration consists of a screening period which includes a minimum of a 14 day treatment free wash-out period. Subjects meeting the baseline criteria will have a 12 week treatment period. Maximum total study duration is 15 weeks: 2 3 week screening / washout period; 12 week double-blind treatment.

Primary efficacy will be based on OAB-q symptom bother score.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Urinary Bladder, Overactive

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Placebo

Matching placebo tablet taken once daily

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Oral Administration

Solifenacin Succinate

5mg or 10mg tablet taken once daily

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Solifenacin Succinate

Intervention Type DRUG

Oral Administration

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Placebo

Oral Administration

Intervention Type DRUG

Solifenacin Succinate

Oral Administration

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

VESIcare® YM905

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Ambulatory male or female subject ≥ 18 years of age and able to use the toilet without difficulty
* History of OAB symptoms for ≥ 3 months
* An average of ≥ 8 micturitions per 24 hours and ≥ 1 urgency episode (with or without incontinence) per 24 hours as documented in a 3-day micturition diary
* Subjects are bothered by symptoms as reflected by PPBC ≥3

Exclusion Criteria

* Evidence of chronic urologic inflammation such as interstitial cystitis and bladder stones; uncontrolled narrow angle glaucoma; urinary or gastric retention
* Recurrent urinary tract infection (UTI) of \> 3 episodes within the last 3 months or evidence of a urinary tract infection at Baseline Visit (Visit 2)
* Significant stress incontinence or mixed stress/urge incontinence where stress is the predominant factor as determined by the investigator
* History of renal or hepatic impairment(2 x Upper Limit of Normal(ULN) values in parameters and considered clinically significant by the investigator
* History of diagnosed gastrointestinal obstruction disease
* Subject has a known diagnosis or history of carcinoma (including prostate cancer) except non metastatic basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin that has been successfully treated or previous pelvis radiation within the past five years
* Known or suspected hypersensitivity to solifenacin succinate, any components, or other anticholinergics
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Astellas Pharma Inc

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Astellas Pharma US, Inc

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Central Contact

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Astellas Pharma US, Inc.

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Montgomery, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Buena Park, California, United States

Site Status

Carmichael, California, United States

Site Status

Fresno, California, United States

Site Status

Sacramento, California, United States

Site Status

San Bernardino, California, United States

Site Status

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Aurora, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Englewood, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Waterbury, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Clearwater, Florida, United States

Site Status

Plantation, Florida, United States

Site Status

Tallahassee, Florida, United States

Site Status

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

Wellington, Florida, United States

Site Status

Roswell, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Idaho Falls, Idaho, United States

Site Status

Melrose Park, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Jeffersonville, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Shreveport, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Watertown, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Billings, Montana, United States

Site Status

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Englewood, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Lawrenceville, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Endwell, New York, United States

Site Status

Garden City, New York, United States

Site Status

Kingston, New York, United States

Site Status

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Orchard Park, New York, United States

Site Status

Poughkeepsie, New York, United States

Site Status

Concord, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Raleigh, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Fargo, North Dakota, United States

Site Status

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Lyndhurst, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Edmond, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Central Point, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Uniontown, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

West Reading, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Greer, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Simpsonville, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Arlington, Texas, United States

Site Status

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Bedford, Texas, United States

Site Status

Corpus Christi, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Mount Lake, Washington, United States

Site Status

Spokane, Washington, United States

Site Status

Tacoma, Washington, United States

Site Status

Madison, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Vardy MD, Mitcheson HD, Samuels TA, Wegenke JD, Forero-Schwanhaeuser S, Marshall TS, He W. Effects of solifenacin on overactive bladder symptoms, symptom bother and other patient-reported outcomes: results from VIBRANT - a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Int J Clin Pract. 2009 Dec;63(12):1702-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2009.02209.x.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 19930331 (View on PubMed)

Stoniute A, Madhuvrata P, Still M, Barron-Millar E, Nabi G, Omar MI. Oral anticholinergic drugs versus placebo or no treatment for managing overactive bladder syndrome in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 May 9;5(5):CD003781. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003781.pub3.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37160401 (View on PubMed)

Crosby RD, Mathias SD, Marshall TS. Relationships between symptoms, symptom bother, and health-related quality of life in patients with overactive bladder taking solifenacin or placebo in the VIBRANT study. Int J Clin Pract. 2011 Feb;65(2):211-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2010.02532.x.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 21235700 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.astellas.us/docs/vesicare.pdf

Link to Prescribing Information

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

905-UC-010

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id