A Multicenter VESIcare® Efficacy and Safety Study for the Treatment of Urgency Associated With Overactive Bladder (OAB)

NCT ID: NCT00454896

Last Updated: 2014-09-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

739 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2004-05-31

Study Completion Date

2005-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose is to evaluate the efficacy of 5 and 10mg VESIcare® (solifenacin succinate) in patients with urgency who have overactive bladder syndrome.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Urinary Bladder, Overactive

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

VESIcare®

Intervention Type DRUG

Oral

2

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Oral

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

VESIcare®

Oral

Intervention Type DRUG

placebo

Oral

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

solifenacin succinate YM905

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* At least 1 urinary urgency episode/24h (on average) documented in a 3-day patient diary in the screening phase with or without urge incontinence, and usually with frequency and nocturia, described as OAB
* Patients may be included if they were never exposed to anticholinergic agents specified for the treatment of OAB. Patients may also be included if they have previously been treated with FDA-approved anticholinergic agents for the treatment of OAB such as oxybutynin chloride and are no longer receiving such treatment for a minimum of 14 days immediately preceding entry into the study. These previously treated patients must present at the investigative site on no anticholinergic agents and with the desire to receive treatment for OAB. Previous non-drug treatment of OAB is allowed if it has been established at least 4 weeks prior to study entry and is continued throughout the study.
* Patients having urgency with or without urge incontinence accompanied by frequency of ≥8 episodes per 24 hours, and/or nocturia, for a period of ≥3 months prior to screening.

Exclusion Criteria

* Previous treatment with darifenacin
* Duration of urgency with or without urge incontinence, usually accompanied with frequency and nocturia for \<3 months
* Significant stress incontinence or mixed stress/urge incontinence where stress is the predominant factor as determined by the Investigator
* Evidence of a urinary tract infection; chronic inflammation such as interstitial cystitis and bladder stones
* Clinically significant outflow obstruction (benign prostatic hyperplasia) as determined by the Investigator
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Astellas Pharma Inc

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Use Central Contact

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Astellas Pharma US, Inc.

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Scottsdale, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Atherton, California, United States

Site Status

Carmichael, California, United States

Site Status

Escondido, California, United States

Site Status

Fresno, California, United States

Site Status

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Mission Hills, California, United States

Site Status

Mission Viejo, California, United States

Site Status

Salinas, California, United States

Site Status

Valley Village, California, United States

Site Status

Aurora, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

New London, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Norwalk, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Trumbull, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Waterbury, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

Boyton Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Clearwater, Florida, United States

Site Status

Clearwater, Florida, United States

Site Status

Gainesville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Pembroke Pines, Florida, United States

Site Status

Plantation, Florida, United States

Site Status

Tallahassee, Florida, United States

Site Status

Alpharetta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Blue Ridge, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Marietta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Boise, Idaho, United States

Site Status

Centralia, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Slidell, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Bloomfield Hills, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Chesterfield, Missouri, United States

Site Status

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Billings, Montana, United States

Site Status

Lawrenceville, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

South Bound Brook, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

Albany, New York, United States

Site Status

East Syracuse, New York, United States

Site Status

Hewlett, New York, United States

Site Status

Lewiston, New York, United States

Site Status

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Concord, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Hickory, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Bismarck, North Dakota, United States

Site Status

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Eugene, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Endwell, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Media, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Monroeville, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Uniontown, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Athens, Texas, United States

Site Status

Ogden, Utah, United States

Site Status

West Point, Utah, United States

Site Status

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Spokane, Washington, United States

Site Status

Vancouver, Washington, United States

Site Status

Morgantown, West Virginia, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Karram MM, Toglia MR, Serels SR, Andoh M, Fakhoury A, Forero-Schwanhaeuser S. Treatment with solifenacin increases warning time and improves symptoms of overactive bladder: results from VENUS, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Urology. 2009 Jan;73(1):14-8. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.08.485. Epub 2008 Nov 8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18995887 (View on PubMed)

Toglia MR, Serels SR, Laramee C, Karram MM, Nandy IM, Andoh M, Seifeldin R, Forero-Schwanhaeuser S. Solifenacin for overactive bladder: patient-reported outcomes from a large placebo-controlled trial. Postgrad Med. 2009 Sep;121(5):151-8. doi: 10.3810/pgm.2009.09.2062.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19820284 (View on PubMed)

Stoniute A, Madhuvrata P, Still M, Barron-Millar E, Nabi G, Omar MI. Oral anticholinergic drugs versus placebo or no treatment for managing overactive bladder syndrome in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 May 9;5(5):CD003781. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003781.pub3.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37160401 (View on PubMed)

Serels SR, Toglia MR, Forero-Schwanhaeuser S, He W. Impact of solifenacin on diary-recorded and patient-reported urgency in patients with severe overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms. Curr Med Res Opin. 2010 Oct;26(10):2277-85. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2010.509582.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 20707767 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

905-UC-005

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Fesoterodine Flexible Dose Study
NCT00536484 COMPLETED PHASE3
OnabotulinumtoxinA Bladder Injection Study
NCT03523091 TERMINATED PHASE4