An Assessment of pH Testing Methods

NCT ID: NCT01364610

Last Updated: 2015-06-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

86 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-07-31

Study Completion Date

2009-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common and potentially debilitating disorder. Typical symptoms include heartburn and regurgitation of acid tasting substances. GERD is a chronic disease and in some cases, more alarming symptoms including food sticking in the esophagus, pain with swallowing, bleeding, anemia and weight loss develop.

In Alberta, upper endoscopy is the first line of investigation accompanied by an ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring for patients with symptoms that are unresponsive to acid-suppressing therapy or who exhibit alarm symptoms.

Current standard of care in Alberta for esophageal pH monitoring first requires an esophageal manometry test to identify the location of the lower esophageal sphincter followed by the placement of a thin catheter with one or more pH probes inserted through the nose and taped in place to the face for 20 -24 hours. The patient wears a small battery powered data logger and maintains a diary of GERD symptoms and activity. This system enables the recording and correlation of specific symptoms with reflux episodes over extended periods and provides direct evidence of GERD. The nasally passed pH catheter is uncomfortable and restrictive for some patients often resulting in abnormal eating, drinking, activity and sleeping patterns. The data collected may not be representative of the patient's typical experience and may not reflect the true severity of the disease.

A wireless diagnostic pH monitoring system called Bravo pH Monitoring System developed by Medtronic is approved for use in Canada and is commercially available. This system eliminates the need for a catheter by utilizing a capsule the size of a gel-cap and radio frequency technology to monitor esophageal pH. It has been shown to be safe and as sensitive as conventional catheter-based pH probe monitoring. The Bravo system can be sited either endoscopically or manometrically.

The goal of this study is to test the Bravo Wireless pH system in Alberta using manometric siting to assess feasibility, patient outcomes and tolerance.

Hypotheses:

1. Patient tolerance of the Bravo system is superior to standard pH-metry.
2. Manometric placement of Bravo is as successful as standard pH-metry.

Our aims:

1. To assess patient tolerance of Bravo versus standard pH-metry.
2. To compare the success rate of manometric peroral placement of Bravo pH probe versus standard pH-metry.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Gastroesophageal Reflux

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Standard Care

Group 1 will have standard catheter based pH-metry. All participants will answer a questionnaire assessing tolerance and satisfaction of both the siting and placement methods and the 24 hour monitoring period.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Standard Care

Intervention Type DEVICE

Nasally passed pH catheter sited by manometry, accompanied by battery powered data logger. Participant activated event marker in response to symptoms, meals and body position changes.

Bravo pH Monitoring System

Group 2 will undergo unsedated peroral placement of the Bravo capsule. All participants will answer a questionnaire assessing tolerance and satisfaction of both the siting and placement methods and the 24 hour pH monitoring period.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Bravo

Intervention Type DEVICE

Bravo pH Monitoring System sited manometrically.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Bravo

Bravo pH Monitoring System sited manometrically.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Standard Care

Nasally passed pH catheter sited by manometry, accompanied by battery powered data logger. Participant activated event marker in response to symptoms, meals and body position changes.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Bravo pH Monitoring System

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age 18 - 75 years
* Able to provide written consent
* Symptoms potentially due to acid reflux and referred for an ambulatory pH study as part of routine clinical care
* Able and willing to potentially undergo peroral Bravo placement
* Able to communicate adequately with the investigator and to comply with the requirements for the entire study

Exclusion Criteria

* Previous esophageal surgery, or any known anatomic or functional defect of the digestive tract that might make capsule passage or retrieval unsafe
* Clinical evidence (including physical exam and/or EKG) of significant cardiovascular, respiratory, renal, hepatic, gastrointestinal, hematological, neurological, psychiatric or other disease that may interfere with the objectives of the study and/or pose safety concerns
* Allergy to topical anesthetic
* Any implanted electrical device such as a pacemaker, defibrillator or neurostimulator
* Pregnant or breast-feeding females
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Calgary

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Christopher Andrews

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Calgary

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

University of Alberta

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Andrews CN, Sadowski DC, Lazarescu A, Williams C, Neshev E, Storr M, Au F, Heitman SJ. Unsedated peroral wireless pH capsule placement vs. standard pH testing: a randomized study and cost analysis. BMC Gastroenterol. 2012 May 31;12:58. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-12-58.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 22650250 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Bravo

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Endoscopic Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
NCT05678491 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION NA
Validation of RDQ Questionnaire
NCT00291746 COMPLETED PHASE4
Epithelial Damage in GERD
NCT01867931 COMPLETED