Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
86 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2008-07-31
2009-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
In Alberta, upper endoscopy is the first line of investigation accompanied by an ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring for patients with symptoms that are unresponsive to acid-suppressing therapy or who exhibit alarm symptoms.
Current standard of care in Alberta for esophageal pH monitoring first requires an esophageal manometry test to identify the location of the lower esophageal sphincter followed by the placement of a thin catheter with one or more pH probes inserted through the nose and taped in place to the face for 20 -24 hours. The patient wears a small battery powered data logger and maintains a diary of GERD symptoms and activity. This system enables the recording and correlation of specific symptoms with reflux episodes over extended periods and provides direct evidence of GERD. The nasally passed pH catheter is uncomfortable and restrictive for some patients often resulting in abnormal eating, drinking, activity and sleeping patterns. The data collected may not be representative of the patient's typical experience and may not reflect the true severity of the disease.
A wireless diagnostic pH monitoring system called Bravo pH Monitoring System developed by Medtronic is approved for use in Canada and is commercially available. This system eliminates the need for a catheter by utilizing a capsule the size of a gel-cap and radio frequency technology to monitor esophageal pH. It has been shown to be safe and as sensitive as conventional catheter-based pH probe monitoring. The Bravo system can be sited either endoscopically or manometrically.
The goal of this study is to test the Bravo Wireless pH system in Alberta using manometric siting to assess feasibility, patient outcomes and tolerance.
Hypotheses:
1. Patient tolerance of the Bravo system is superior to standard pH-metry.
2. Manometric placement of Bravo is as successful as standard pH-metry.
Our aims:
1. To assess patient tolerance of Bravo versus standard pH-metry.
2. To compare the success rate of manometric peroral placement of Bravo pH probe versus standard pH-metry.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Endoscopic Findings in Patients With Typical Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) Symptoms
NCT00730106
Canadian, Multi-Centre Study of Symptom Burden and Clinical Management in Subjects With GERD
NCT00634023
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) Segmentation: Document How Swiss General Practitioners (GPs) Allocate Their GERD Patients to the Three GERD Patient Segments
NCT00688675
Barrett's Esophagus in Patients with GERD
NCT06897540
Acetic Acid for the Detection of Esophageal Neoplasms
NCT04054713
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Standard Care
Group 1 will have standard catheter based pH-metry. All participants will answer a questionnaire assessing tolerance and satisfaction of both the siting and placement methods and the 24 hour monitoring period.
Standard Care
Nasally passed pH catheter sited by manometry, accompanied by battery powered data logger. Participant activated event marker in response to symptoms, meals and body position changes.
Bravo pH Monitoring System
Group 2 will undergo unsedated peroral placement of the Bravo capsule. All participants will answer a questionnaire assessing tolerance and satisfaction of both the siting and placement methods and the 24 hour pH monitoring period.
Bravo
Bravo pH Monitoring System sited manometrically.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Bravo
Bravo pH Monitoring System sited manometrically.
Standard Care
Nasally passed pH catheter sited by manometry, accompanied by battery powered data logger. Participant activated event marker in response to symptoms, meals and body position changes.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Able to provide written consent
* Symptoms potentially due to acid reflux and referred for an ambulatory pH study as part of routine clinical care
* Able and willing to potentially undergo peroral Bravo placement
* Able to communicate adequately with the investigator and to comply with the requirements for the entire study
Exclusion Criteria
* Clinical evidence (including physical exam and/or EKG) of significant cardiovascular, respiratory, renal, hepatic, gastrointestinal, hematological, neurological, psychiatric or other disease that may interfere with the objectives of the study and/or pose safety concerns
* Allergy to topical anesthetic
* Any implanted electrical device such as a pacemaker, defibrillator or neurostimulator
* Pregnant or breast-feeding females
18 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Calgary
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Christopher Andrews
Principal Investigator
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Calgary
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
University of Alberta
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Andrews CN, Sadowski DC, Lazarescu A, Williams C, Neshev E, Storr M, Au F, Heitman SJ. Unsedated peroral wireless pH capsule placement vs. standard pH testing: a randomized study and cost analysis. BMC Gastroenterol. 2012 May 31;12:58. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-12-58.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Bravo
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.