Impact of Exercise Training on Pain and Brain Function in Gulf War Veterans

NCT ID: NCT01350492

Last Updated: 2020-10-20

Basic Information

• Recruitment Status: COMPLETED
• Clinical Phase: NA
• Total Enrollment: 77 participants
• Study Classification: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Start Date: 2013-04-16
• Study Completion Date: 2019-06-18

Brief Summary

This study is intended to test the influence of weight training on physical symptoms, physical activity and brain structure and function in Gulf War Veterans with chronic widespread muscle pain.

Detailed Description

Musculoskeletal pain in soldiers who returned from the Persian Gulf War is a serious problem. Numerous studies have reported musculoskeletal pain as a primary symptom of sick Gulf Veterans (GVs), with ~100,000 Veterans (~15%) reporting unresolved pain affecting their social and professional lives. Pain and other symptoms are often disabling with 1 in 7 United States Veterans seeking care for war-related health concerns and ~12% receiving disability compensation. Thus, a significant number of military personnel are no longer able to perform their duties due to medically unexplained symptoms including pain, fatigue and cognitive problems. Importantly, recent evidence suggests that chronic pain complaints in most GVs have not resolved. Similar problems appear to be on the horizon for Veterans from Operations Enduring and Iraqi Freedom. Understanding the pathophysiological consequences of chronic muscle pain is important for better determining both the efficacy and mechanism of treatments aimed at decreasing debilitating symptoms and improving physical function among Veterans coping with chronic pain.

Given the dearth of experimental data in GVs with chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMP), we have patterned much of our research in GVs after our research in fibromyalgia (FM), a disorder with a primary symptom of muscle and joint pain in civilians. Our work and the work of others suggest that FM pain is produced and maintained by central nervous system (CNS) dysregulation of nociceptive and pain processes. Our work also suggests that phenomena similar to those observed in FM may be occurring in GVs with CMP. Like FM patients, GVs with CMP, 1) are more sensitive to experimental pain stimuli, 2) exhibit exaggerated pain responses following acute exercise, 3) experience more muscle pain during acute exercise and 4) show augmented brain responses to both painful and non-painful experimental stimuli. These data suggest that some of the same pathophysiological mechanisms involved in FM may be maintaining chronic widespread muscle pain in GVs. Critical unanswered questions include whether promising treatments for CMP in GVs can affect laboratory measures of pain sensitivity and pain regulation and whether these changes relate to clinical improvements. We intend to begin to answer these questions by examining perceptual and brain hemodynamic responses to standardized painful stimuli and documenting their relationships to clinical outcomes before, during and upon completion of a viable, novel treatment for CMP.

There are no known efficacious treatments for GVs suffering CMP. Efficacy studies are needed to begin determining effective treatments for our Veterans following their service of our country. In FM, exercise training (both aerobic and resistance modes) is widely recognized as one of the few consistently efficacious treatments, resulting in improved well-being, increased physical function and in some cases decreased pain. One large scale treatment trial of aerobic exercise in GVs with chronic multi-symptom illness showed only modest improvements in pain, fatigue and mental health. We believe this trial had several limitations that greatly attenuated the treatment's effectiveness; consequently, it is premature to discount exercise training as a treatment for GVs with CMP. Further, we propose a novel approach that employs progressive resistance exercise training (RET) to treat GVs with CMP, while obtaining objective measures of nociceptive function, brain white matter tract pathways and total physical activity.

In addition to exercise performed as part of a structured training program, physical activity behaviors are important determinants of physical and mental health. Greater total physical activity levels are associated with increased physical function, improved mental health, increased energy and decreased symptoms of chronic pain. To our knowledge, none of the exercise training trials in FM have actually measured the impact of the exercise training on physical activity behaviors during daytime hours outside the intervention. It is plausible that the adoption of a structured exercise training program reduces physical activities performed during the rest of the day, and that this change in total physical activity could affect health outcomes. Objective measurement of physical activity will allow us to determine whether RET increases, decreases or has no impact on total physical activity levels in GVs with CMP. This will allow us to begin to characterize sub-groups who benefit the most from RET (e.g. potentially those GVs that maintain or increase their extra-intervention physical activity). Thus, in addition to supervised RET, we will objectively measure total physical activity levels outside of the intervention using accelerometers before, during and following treatment.

In summary, we propose to determine the efficacy of RET for the treatment of CMP and associated symptoms in GVs. In addition, we will assess the influence of RET on total physical activity, pain sensitivity and regulation, and brain white matter tracts. By applying functional neuroimaging techniques in conjunction with pain psychophysics we will test how the brains of Veterans with CMP respond to sensory stimuli and whether these responses can be modified by exercise training. We plan to use blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) methods to evaluate the function of brain regions involved in pain processing and control and the microstructural properties of white matter tract pathways that connect these regions. In addition, we will determine the influence of RET on extra-intervention physical activity behaviors, testing a critical and unanswered question - whether total physical activity levels change as a result of engaging in a RET program in patients with CMP. The primary goals of this project will be accomplished by comparing GVs with CMP assigned to either RET or wait-list control (WLC) in a randomized controlled trial.

Conditions

Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain

Study Design

• Allocation Method: RANDOMIZED
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Primary Study Purpose: TREATMENT
• Blinding Strategy: NONE

Study Groups

Arm 1

Resistance exercise training

Group Type: EXPERIMENTAL

Resistance Exercise Training

Intervention Type: BEHAVIORAL

16 weeks of resistance exercise training for the treatment of chronic muscle pain compared to wait-list control

Arm 2

Waitlist Control

Group Type: NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Resistance Exercise Training

16 weeks of resistance exercise training for the treatment of chronic muscle pain compared to wait-list control

Intervention Type: BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

• Veteran of the Persian Gulf War
• Chronic muscle pain

Exclusion Criteria

• Regular participation in resistance exercise
• Color blindness
• Claustrophobia
• Medical conditions that could explain the Veteran's pain
• Use of exclusionary drugs 3 weeks prior to testing
• Major depressive disorder with melancholic features
• Substance abuse
• Schizophrenia
• Bipolar disorder

• Minimum Eligible Age: 35 Years
• Maximum Eligible Age: 65 Years
• Eligible Sex: ALL
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Sponsors

VA Office of Research and Development

FED

Sponsor Role: lead

Responsible Party

Responsibility Role: SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Dane B. Cook, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital, Madison, WI

Locations

William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital, Madison, WI

Madison, Wisconsin, United States

Countries

United States

Provided Documents

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

SPLD-004-10S

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id