Proprioceptive Function, Postural Stability & Clinical Outcome After Stump Preserving Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Surgery
NCT ID: NCT01348945
Last Updated: 2011-05-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
48 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2011-05-31
2012-02-29
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
In local setting, stump preserving ACL surgery is the usual practice in handling partial ACL tear. With the background of the surgery's potential benefits in restoration of knee function, a single-blinded, comparative study on the difference in proprioception, postural stability and clinical outcome between stump preserving ACL surgery and reconstruction is conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Proprioceptive Training for Gait and Knee Function After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
NCT07268651
Proprioceptive Isokinetic Repositioning, Functional Testing, and a Self-reported Questionnaire Before and After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
NCT04058574
Can Sensorimotor Function Predict Graft Rupture After ACL Reconstruction
NCT04162613
Clinical Trial Comparing Three Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructive Procedures
NCT00418964
The Effects of Remnant-Preserving Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction on Proprioception and Functionality
NCT05057442
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The proprioceptive function of human ACL has been recognized since the 1980's. The first study by described the presence of mechanoreceptors in human ACL fibres. Study further proved that ACL is extensively innervated with neural elements.
Numerous studies reported ACL is rich in mechanoreceptors which contribute in proprioceptive function. One study on 29 ACL remnant reported that there are mechanoreceptors including Ruffini, Pacini receptors, Golgi tendon organ-like receptors and free nerves endings in the remnant and showed the numbers of mechanoreceptors is significantly related to joint sense accuracy. Another study performed by same group of researchers reported that a somatosensory evoked potential could be recorded in ACL remnants after electrical stimulation, confirmed original sensory neurons are preserved to certain extent, which may help graft neuralization and restoration of knee function. This further echos with various studies that, in ACL-deficit knee, loss of proprioceptive function is reported with corelation to the number of mechanoreceptors. At a result, it comes up with an idea that preserving the ACL remnant should help maintaining or facilitating proprioceptive function, by the operation technique of ACL augmentation.
ACL augmentation is a relatively new technique which preserves and augments the ACL remnant using extra graft. Under arthroscopic examination, if any of the ACL bundles, anteromedial (AM) and posterolateral (PL), shows a partial tear remnant of reasonable size, thickness and tension, augmentation may be performed instead of reconstruct the whole ligament. Instead of removing the remaining stump, it would be preserved as much as possible, and a formal ACL reconstruction would be performed. A commonly used graft is single-bundle autogenous semitendinosus gracilis tendon. As the retaining ACL fiber contains mechanoreceptor responsible for proprioception, it is believed that better knee proprioception and postural sense could be achieved by preserving the ACL remnant. Also, better vascularization and stronger mechanical protection is expected as native ACL fiber is retained.
The current management of partial tear ACL injury are mainly conservative treatment and surgical treatment, including reconstruction and augmentation. For augmentation, the common practise is to perform a "Selective Bundle Reconstruction", that is to reconstruct the torn bundle, either AM or PL reconstruction, and preserve the remaining intact one.
The clinical benefits of ACL augmentation had been reported by several studies. A study had demonstrated good clinical results in International Knee Documentation Commitee (IKDC) knee evaluation score, Cincinnati Knee Score and KT1000 in augmentation using autologous doubled and tripled semitendinosus (selective AM or PL) reconstruction at 1 year post-operatively.
An other comparison study between ACL augmentation (selective AM or PL reconstruction) and reconstruction showed superior result in knee anterior stability in clinical tests, KT2000 and knee joint position sense in augmentation group at a 2-year follow-up period. This study has demonstrated the post-operation comparison only and allogenic fascia lata graft was also used in the control reconstruction group, which is not a common graft to be used in ACL surgery in local setting. Moreover, as the assessment is performed at 2 years post-operatively, the more immediate and early post-operative effect of this surgical technique is still questionable.
As mentioned above, ACL augmentation may has potential clinical advantages including better knee stability, mechanical strength and proprioceptive function, yet evidence of the earlier effect of this technique is still lacking, with joint position sense was demonstrated by one study only. With the relatively new technique's popularity and potential benefit on proprioception, it deserves more research on studying the difference in both the clinical and proprioception outcome from reconstruction. Therefore, a comparative study on the difference in knee proprioception and postural stability between ACL augmentation and reconstruction, including early post-operative assessment is performed.
In local setting, if the ACL injury is noted to be partially torn from pre-operative Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), surgeons would try to preserve the remaining stump as much as possible with a single bundle ACL reconstruction performed intra-operatively. In order to make the current study result meaningful and could be generalized in local setting, ACL augmentation is renamed as ACL stump-preserving surgery, which is the common practice in local setting.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Stump Preserving ACL Surgery
Patients of partial tear ACL injury fulfilling inclusion criteria received stump preserving ACL surgery, entered conventional ACL reconstruction rehabilitation program
conventional ACL rehabilitation program
Conventional post-operative physical therapy exercises and rehabilitation, designed for ACL reconstruction for 6 months to 9 months.
ACL Reconstruction
Patients with complete tear ACL injury received ACL reconstruction entered conventional ACL rehabilitation program
conventional ACL rehabilitation program
Conventional post-operative physical therapy exercises and rehabilitation, designed for ACL reconstruction for 6 months to 9 months.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
conventional ACL rehabilitation program
Conventional post-operative physical therapy exercises and rehabilitation, designed for ACL reconstruction for 6 months to 9 months.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* for ACL reconstruction group: complete tear ACL injury
* for both groups: no complication such as wound infection after operation
* no history of medical problems, for example, heart disease
Exclusion Criteria
* previous or concomitant surgery on the relevant knee and other joints
* surgery or traumatic injuries to the contralateral limb
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Chinese University of Hong Kong
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Physiotherapy Department of Prince of Wales Hospital
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Holly KH Leung
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Physiotherapy Department, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Physiotherapy Department, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin
Hong Kong, , China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SPACL-CS
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.