The Single Leg Squat Test to Evaluate Dynamic Knee Stability After ACLR
NCT ID: NCT05294783
Last Updated: 2022-03-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
43 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2018-07-01
2021-12-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Effect of Single-leg 20-degree Squats Combined With Conventional Training on the Biomechanical Characteristics of Gait After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Surgery
NCT07308431
The Effect of Whole Body Vibration After ACLR
NCT05254054
The Role of Muscle in Knee Stability
NCT04633161
Clinical Trial Comparing Three Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructive Procedures
NCT00418964
Proprioceptive Training for Gait and Knee Function After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
NCT07268651
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Regular monitoring of the knee stability before and after ACL reconstruction is necessary for medical personnel to design the most suitable rehabilitation program. In contrast to jumping and hopping tasks, squatting tasks present a similar weight bearing profile during knee flexion, but without the potentially risky landing phase. As poor knee dynamic knee stability can be visualized as a wobbling knee (frequent knee movements). In order to quantitatively and objectively evaluate dynamic knee stability from observing the knee wobbling motion, we propose a single leg squat and hold task(SLSH) with kinematic analysis. Kinematic curve derived from the SLSH involves both the magnitudes and the frequency of the motion fluctuation. This study aims (1) to compare knee kinematic variations capturing knee wobbling during SLSH between ACL-deficient patients who are scheduled for ACLR and healthy controls; and(2)to detect the changes in knee kinematic variations during SLSH following ACLR. We hypothesize that the ACL-deficient patients demonstrate greater knee kinematic variation than the healthy subjects and the knee kinematic variation will reduce after ACLR.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
ACL injured patients
All the ACL injured patients recruited underwent ACL reconstruction with the same group of surgeons lead by the same chief surgeon.
ACL reconstruction
ACL reconstruction is a standard surgery for ACL injured patients
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
ACL reconstruction
ACL reconstruction is a standard surgery for ACL injured patients
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Participate in level I or level II sports with a Tegner score of more than 6 before injury(level I: sports involving jumping, cutting and pivoting, e.g.football, basketball etc; Level II: sports involving lateral movements, less pivoting than Level I eg. racket sports)
3. Scheduled for ACLR because of unilateral ACL injury;
4. Failure to meet any single criteria for a potential coper;
5. Contralateral knee without history of injury.
Exclusion Criteria
2. preoperative radiographic signs of arthritis;
3. Revision ACL surgery;
4. With ankle pain, hip pain, low back pain or spine pathology;
5. Woman with pregnancy.
18 Years
35 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Chinese University of Hong Kong
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Xin He
Principal investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Xin HE, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
The Chinese University of Hong Kong
Hong Kong, , Hong Kong
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2018.134
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.