Combination of Magnesium and Lidocaine for the Pretreatment of Pain That is Caused by the Injection of Propofol

NCT ID: NCT01342510

Last Updated: 2019-05-29

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

200 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-04-30

Study Completion Date

2012-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Since the introduction of propofol into routine anesthesia practice, the phenomena of pain on injection has plagued anesthesia providers. Propofol, an unstable phenol, triggers the release of bradykinin on injection. This release causes a painful burning sensation in the patient at the site of injection. Anesthesia providers have attempted a large number of remedies to prevent this pain on injection. Previously explored ideas include injecting propofol into larger veins, warming of the hand with hot packs, and intravenous pretreatment with numerous other medications. Currently, pretreatment with lidocaine is commonly administered to prevent propofol injection pain. No studies to date have looked at the combination of lidocaine and magnesium in a single syringe for the pretreatment of pain on injection caused by propofol. In addition, the administration protocols that have been studied thus far do not mirror clinical practice at the University of Wisconsin. The investigators propose studying the use of magnesium and lidocaine in a single syringe for pretreatment of propofol related pain on injection.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study will involve little if any change from the typical induction of general anesthesia. Considering that lidocaine is routinely used for the induction of anesthesia, and that some anesthesia staff also inject magnesium prior to propofol, there will be little variation in the induction of anesthesia. Patients will be randomly assigned (by microsoft excel program providing a random number 1-4) to one of four groups:

1. Lidocaine 50 mg in a 10 cc syringe
2. Magnesium sulfate 0.25 g (2 mOsmol) in a 10 cc syringe
3. 0.9% saline in a 10 cc syringe
4. Lidocaine 50 mg and 0.25 g (2 mOsmol) magnesium sulfate in a 10 cc syringe

Study drugs will be prepared in identical syringes by the Pharmaceutical Research Center (PRC). Study personnel will receive a syringe labeled with the study number as well as a data collection sheet labeled with the study number. A 20 gauge angiocatheter will be inserted into the dorsum of the hand for IV fluids and medication administration. Subjects will be given preoperative 1-2 mg intravenous midazolam for sedation when the subject is en route to the operating room as is typically done at the discretion of the anesthesia provider caring for the patient. After instituting standard monitors and providing preoxygenation, the study drug will be injected. Twenty seconds later, 50 mg of propofol will be injected. Ten seconds after infusion of propofol, the subjects will then be asked a standard question about pain on injection "Are you having pain at your IV site?". Any behavioral signs such as facial grimacing, arm withdrawal, or tears will be noted. Pain will be assessed using a four point scale: 0=no pain, 1=mild pain (pain reported only in response to questioning and without behavioral signs), 2=moderate pain (pain reported in response to questioning and accompanied by a behavioral sign, or pain reported spontaneously without questioning), 3=severe pain (strong vocal response or response accompanied by facial grimacing, arm withdrawal, or tears). Study key personnel will do these pain assessments; the behavioral signs and self-reporting of pain will be recorded separate from one another. The induction of anesthesia will then by completed with the appropriate amount of propofol. Formally assessing pain following injection is not something that is standard care but all patients are currently warned prior to injection that they may experience some warmth or burning at the site of their intravenous line.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

General Anesthesia Intravenous Anesthesia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Lidocaine

Lidocaine 50 mg in a 10 cc syringe

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Magnesium Sulfate

Intervention Type DRUG

We propose studying Lidocaine 50 mg in a 10 cc syringe, Magnesium sulfate 0.25 g (2 mOsmol) in a 10 cc syringe, 0.9% saline in a 10 cc syringe, Lidocaine 50 mg and 0.25 g (2 mOsmol) magnesium sulfate in a 10 cc syringe for pretreatment of propofol related pain on injection.

Lidocaine

Intervention Type DRUG

We propose studying Lidocaine 50 mg in a 10 cc syringe, Magnesium sulfate 0.25 g (2 mOsmol) in a 10 cc syringe, 0.9% saline in a 10 cc syringe, Lidocaine 50 mg and 0.25 g (2 mOsmol) magnesium sulfate in a 10 cc syringe for pretreatment of propofol related pain on injection.

Magnesium

Magnesium sulfate 0.25 g (2 mOsmol) in a 10 cc syringe

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Magnesium Sulfate

Intervention Type DRUG

We propose studying Lidocaine 50 mg in a 10 cc syringe, Magnesium sulfate 0.25 g (2 mOsmol) in a 10 cc syringe, 0.9% saline in a 10 cc syringe, Lidocaine 50 mg and 0.25 g (2 mOsmol) magnesium sulfate in a 10 cc syringe for pretreatment of propofol related pain on injection.

Lidocaine/Magnesium

Lidocaine 50 mg and 0.25 g (2 mOsmol) magnesium sulfate in a 10 cc syringe

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Magnesium Sulfate

Intervention Type DRUG

We propose studying Lidocaine 50 mg in a 10 cc syringe, Magnesium sulfate 0.25 g (2 mOsmol) in a 10 cc syringe, 0.9% saline in a 10 cc syringe, Lidocaine 50 mg and 0.25 g (2 mOsmol) magnesium sulfate in a 10 cc syringe for pretreatment of propofol related pain on injection.

Lidocaine/Magnesium

Intervention Type DRUG

We propose studying Lidocaine 50 mg in a 10 cc syringe, Magnesium sulfate 0.25 g (2 mOsmol) in a 10 cc syringe, 0.9% saline in a 10 cc syringe, Lidocaine 50 mg and 0.25 g (2 mOsmol) magnesium sulfate in a 10 cc syringe for pretreatment of propofol related pain on injection.

Control

0.9% saline in a 10 cc syringe

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Magnesium Sulfate

Intervention Type DRUG

We propose studying Lidocaine 50 mg in a 10 cc syringe, Magnesium sulfate 0.25 g (2 mOsmol) in a 10 cc syringe, 0.9% saline in a 10 cc syringe, Lidocaine 50 mg and 0.25 g (2 mOsmol) magnesium sulfate in a 10 cc syringe for pretreatment of propofol related pain on injection.

Control

Intervention Type DRUG

We propose studying Lidocaine 50 mg in a 10 cc syringe, Magnesium sulfate 0.25 g (2 mOsmol) in a 10 cc syringe, 0.9% saline in a 10 cc syringe, Lidocaine 50 mg and 0.25 g (2 mOsmol) magnesium sulfate in a 10 cc syringe for pretreatment of propofol related pain on injection.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Magnesium Sulfate

We propose studying Lidocaine 50 mg in a 10 cc syringe, Magnesium sulfate 0.25 g (2 mOsmol) in a 10 cc syringe, 0.9% saline in a 10 cc syringe, Lidocaine 50 mg and 0.25 g (2 mOsmol) magnesium sulfate in a 10 cc syringe for pretreatment of propofol related pain on injection.

Intervention Type DRUG

Lidocaine

We propose studying Lidocaine 50 mg in a 10 cc syringe, Magnesium sulfate 0.25 g (2 mOsmol) in a 10 cc syringe, 0.9% saline in a 10 cc syringe, Lidocaine 50 mg and 0.25 g (2 mOsmol) magnesium sulfate in a 10 cc syringe for pretreatment of propofol related pain on injection.

Intervention Type DRUG

Control

We propose studying Lidocaine 50 mg in a 10 cc syringe, Magnesium sulfate 0.25 g (2 mOsmol) in a 10 cc syringe, 0.9% saline in a 10 cc syringe, Lidocaine 50 mg and 0.25 g (2 mOsmol) magnesium sulfate in a 10 cc syringe for pretreatment of propofol related pain on injection.

Intervention Type DRUG

Lidocaine/Magnesium

We propose studying Lidocaine 50 mg in a 10 cc syringe, Magnesium sulfate 0.25 g (2 mOsmol) in a 10 cc syringe, 0.9% saline in a 10 cc syringe, Lidocaine 50 mg and 0.25 g (2 mOsmol) magnesium sulfate in a 10 cc syringe for pretreatment of propofol related pain on injection.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All adults American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status 1 and 2 patients selected for general anesthesia.

Exclusion Criteria

* age \< 18 years
* allergy to local anesthetics
* end stage renal disease
* pregnancy
* prisoners
* patients requiring a rapid sequence induction
* refusal to participate and patients already participating in another study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Wisconsin, Madison

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Kristopher M Schroeder, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Wisconsin, Madison

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics

Madison, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Johnson RA, Harper NJ, Chadwick S, Vohra A. Pain on injection of propofol. Methods of alleviation. Anaesthesia. 1990 Jun;45(6):439-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1990.tb14328.x.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 2200299 (View on PubMed)

Yull DN, Barkshire KF, Dexter T. Pretreatment with ketorolac and venous occlusion to reduce pain on injection of propofol. Anaesthesia. 2000 Mar;55(3):284-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2000.01320.x.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 10671850 (View on PubMed)

Huang YW, Buerkle H, Lee TH, Lu CY, Lin CR, Lin SH, Chou AK, Muhammad R, Yang LC. Effect of pretreatment with ketorolac on propofol injection pain. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2002 Sep;46(8):1021-4. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2002.460816.x.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 12190806 (View on PubMed)

Ambesh SP, Dubey PK, Sinha PK. Ondansetron pretreatment to alleviate pain on propofol injection: a randomized, controlled, double-blinded study. Anesth Analg. 1999 Jul;89(1):197-9. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199907000-00035.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 10389803 (View on PubMed)

Apiliogullari S, Keles B, Apiliogullari B, Balasar M, Yilmaz H, Duman A. Comparison of diphenhydramine and lidocaine for prevention of pain after injection of propofol: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2007 Mar;24(3):235-8. doi: 10.1017/S026502150600202X. Epub 2007 Jan 4.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 17202008 (View on PubMed)

Ishiyama T, Kashimoto S, Oguchi T, Furuya A, Fukushima H, Kumazawa T. Clonidine-ephedrine combination reduces pain on injection of propofol and blunts hemodynamic stress responses during the induction sequence. J Clin Anesth. 2006 May;18(3):211-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2005.08.005.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 16731324 (View on PubMed)

Saadawy I, Ertok E, Boker A. Painless injection of propofol: pretreatment with ketamine vs thiopental, meperidine, and lidocaine. Middle East J Anaesthesiol. 2007 Oct;19(3):631-44.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 18044291 (View on PubMed)

Asik I, Yorukoglu D, Gulay I, Tulunay M. Pain on injection of propofol: comparison of metoprolol with lidocaine. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2003 Jun;20(6):487-9. doi: 10.1017/s0265021503000784.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 12803269 (View on PubMed)

Ghai B, Makkar JK, Bala I, Wig J. Effect of parecoxib pretreatment and venous occlusion on propofol injection pain: a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. J Clin Anesth. 2010 Mar;22(2):88-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2009.03.011.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 20304348 (View on PubMed)

Fujii Y, Itakura M. Comparison of lidocaine, metoclopramide, and flurbiprofen axetil for reducing pain on injection of propofol in Japanese adult surgical patients: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study. Clin Ther. 2008 Feb;30(2):280-6. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.02.018.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 18343266 (View on PubMed)

Kwak KH, Ha J, Kim Y, Jeon Y. Efficacy of combination intravenous lidocaine and dexamethasone on propofol injection pain: a randomized, double-blind, prospective study in adult Korean surgical patients. Clin Ther. 2008 Jun;30(6):1113-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.05.019.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 18640467 (View on PubMed)

Agarwal A, Ansari MF, Gupta D, Pandey R, Raza M, Singh PK, Shiopriye, Dhiraj S, Singh U. Pretreatment with thiopental for prevention of pain associated with propofol injection. Anesth Analg. 2004 Mar;98(3):683-6, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000103266.73568.18.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 14980919 (View on PubMed)

Borazan H, Erdem TB, Kececioglu M, Otelcioglu S. Prevention of pain on injection of propofol: a comparison of lidocaine with different doses of paracetamol. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010 Mar;27(3):253-7. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e328330eca2.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 19696679 (View on PubMed)

Kwak K, Kim J, Park S, Lim D, Kim S, Baek W, Jeon Y. Reduction of pain on injection of propofol: combination of pretreatment of remifentanil and premixture of lidocaine with propofol. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2007 Sep;24(9):746-50. doi: 10.1017/S026502150600233X. Epub 2007 Jan 30.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 17261216 (View on PubMed)

Ayoglu H, Altunkaya H, Ozer Y, Yapakci O, Cukdar G, Ozkocak I. Does dexmedetomidine reduce the injection pain due to propofol and rocuronium? Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2007 Jun;24(6):541-5. doi: 10.1017/S0265021506002250. Epub 2007 Jan 23.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 17241503 (View on PubMed)

Memis D, Turan A, Karamanlioglu B, Sut N, Pamukcu Z. The use of magnesium sulfate to prevent pain on injection of propofol. Anesth Analg. 2002 Sep;95(3):606-8, table of contents. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200209000-00020.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 12198045 (View on PubMed)

Agarwal A, Dhiraj S, Raza M, Pandey R, Pandey CK, Singh PK, Singh U, Gupta D. Vein pretreatment with magnesium sulfate to prevent pain on injection of propofol is not justified. Can J Anaesth. 2004 Feb;51(2):130-3. doi: 10.1007/BF03018771.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 14766688 (View on PubMed)

Gajraj NM, Nathanson MH. Preventing pain during injection of propofol: the optimal dose of lidocaine. J Clin Anesth. 1996 Nov;8(7):575-7. doi: 10.1016/s0952-8180(96)00133-x.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 8910180 (View on PubMed)

Sasaki T, Okamura S, Kisara A, Ito M, Yogosawa K, Yagishita Y, Yogosawa T. Effect of lidocaine on pain caused by injection of propofol: comparison of three methods at two injection rates. J Anesth. 1999;13(1):14-6. doi: 10.1007/s005400050015. No abstract available.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 15235946 (View on PubMed)

Tramer MR, Glynn CJ. An evaluation of a single dose of magnesium to supplement analgesia after ambulatory surgery: randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2007 Jun;104(6):1374-9, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000263416.14948.dc.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 17513629 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

H-2010-0139

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Intrathecal Magnesium for Same-day-surgery
NCT01794247 TERMINATED PHASE3