Genome-wide Single Cell Haplotyping as a Generic Method for Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis

NCT ID: NCT01336400

Last Updated: 2011-04-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-10-31

Study Completion Date

2013-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The investigators previously developed approaches to SNP-, CNV- and haplo-type single human cells (Vanneste et al. 2009, Nature Medicine). These methods open the possibility to be developed into a novel generic diagnostic technique which broadens the spectrum of disease-alleles that can be selected against during preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) and which enables to help those couples that cannot be supported by PGD yet. PGD is the genetic analysis of a single blastomere from an in vitro fertilized (IVF) embryo and it is offered to couples to avoid the transmission of heritable genetic disorders to their offspring. PGD analyses are performed for (1) autosomal dominant or recessive monogenic diseases, (2) X-linked disorders and (3) chromosomal aberrations that may result in aneuploid conceptions. This novel method is likely to outperform and hence, replace current techniques for preimplantation genetic diagnosis. In this project the investigators will bring the technology from a proof-of-principle to the clinical application. To this end the investigators will make computational improvements for accurate single blastomere SNP-, CNV- and haplo-typing and perform a large validation study. For the validation studythe investigators will analyse the genomes of the blastomeres derived from 60 spare embryos of different origin: (1) Embryos diagnosed as genetically abnormal using current PCR- and FISH-protocols. (2) Embryos diagnosed as normal for the investigated region using current PCR- and FISH-protocols, but not of sufficient quality to be transferred or frozen. (3) Embryos of the sex that is selected against following PGD based sex-selection, or embryos of the sex that is selected for but of insufficient quality to be transferred or frozen. (4) Embryos that were not biopsied in a PGD cycle since they suffer a slight growth delay. This validation study will allow us to evaluate (1) the clinical validity (false positive and negative rate) and (2) clinical applicability (in terms of ease of use, success rate, etc.). In addition, it will bring us essential further fundamental insights in the origins and mechanisms of chromosomal instability operating during early embryogenesis and its consequences for clinical applications of PGD. Finally, following the validation study, this project will clinically implement the technique to treat 10 families.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_ONLY

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

PGD-FISH

Following couples opting for preimplantation genetic diagnosis on the basis of FISH:

* couples suffering a complex chromosomal rearrangement (CCR)
* couples with X-linked recessive disorders
* couples that carry a balanced chromosomal rearrangement

single cell haplotyping

Intervention Type OTHER

We aim to collect single blastomeres from spare IVF embryos of 30 couples to optimize and test methods for single cell haplotyping. We aim to collect 20 and 10 couples coming to the fertility centre for FISH- or PCR-based PGD respectively. In both groups, at least 5 different indications for PGD will be collected. Per couple, we will perform 10 SNP-arrays: 2 for the couple donating the embryo, 4 for family members (often parents of the couple) and 4 for blastomeres since we aim to pick 2 cells from 2 embryos per couple. For five couples, 2 blastomeres of all available embryos will be aspirated to validate and optimize the phasing methods. Finally, for some embryos, all blastomeres will be picked to be able to prove the reproducibility of single cell haplotyping.

PGD-PCR

Following couples opting for preimplantation genetic diagnosis on the basis of PCR:

-couples at risk for the transmission of monogenic diseases

single cell haplotyping

Intervention Type OTHER

We aim to collect single blastomeres from spare IVF embryos of 30 couples to optimize and test methods for single cell haplotyping. We aim to collect 20 and 10 couples coming to the fertility centre for FISH- or PCR-based PGD respectively. In both groups, at least 5 different indications for PGD will be collected. Per couple, we will perform 10 SNP-arrays: 2 for the couple donating the embryo, 4 for family members (often parents of the couple) and 4 for blastomeres since we aim to pick 2 cells from 2 embryos per couple. For five couples, 2 blastomeres of all available embryos will be aspirated to validate and optimize the phasing methods. Finally, for some embryos, all blastomeres will be picked to be able to prove the reproducibility of single cell haplotyping.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

single cell haplotyping

We aim to collect single blastomeres from spare IVF embryos of 30 couples to optimize and test methods for single cell haplotyping. We aim to collect 20 and 10 couples coming to the fertility centre for FISH- or PCR-based PGD respectively. In both groups, at least 5 different indications for PGD will be collected. Per couple, we will perform 10 SNP-arrays: 2 for the couple donating the embryo, 4 for family members (often parents of the couple) and 4 for blastomeres since we aim to pick 2 cells from 2 embryos per couple. For five couples, 2 blastomeres of all available embryos will be aspirated to validate and optimize the phasing methods. Finally, for some embryos, all blastomeres will be picked to be able to prove the reproducibility of single cell haplotyping.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Blastomeres biopsied from spare embryos ((A) Embryos diagnosed as genetically abnormal using current PCR- and FISH-protocols; (B) Embryos diagnosed as normal for the investigated region using current PCR- and FISH-protocols, but not of sufficient quality to be transferred or frozen; (C) Embryos of the sex that is selected against following PGD based sex-selection, or embryos of the sex that is selected for but of insufficient quality to be transferred or frozen; (D) Embryos that were not biopsied in a PGD cycle since they suffer a slight growth delay.) derived from following patient groups:

1. The first patient group involve couples suffering a complex chromosomal rearrangement (CCR), which is defined as a structural chromosomal rearrangement with at least three breakpoints and an exchange of genetic material between two or more chromosomes.
2. The second patient group involve couples with X-linked recessive disorders.
3. The third patient group consists of couples that carry a balanced chromosomal rearrangement - a translocation, insertion or inversion - that may result in recurrent miscarriage or aneuploid, severely handicapped offspring.
4. A fourth patient group are couples at risk for the transmission of monogenic diseases.
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

KU Leuven

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Vrije Universiteit Brussel

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Universitaire Ziekenhuizen Leuven

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Joris R Vermeesch, Professor

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven

Thierry Voet, Professor

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

KU Leuven

Thomas D'Hooghe, Professor

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven

Yves Moreau, Professor

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

KU Leuven

Karen Sermon, Professor

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Vrije Universiteit Brussel

De Rycke Martine, Professor

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Universitaire Ziekenhuizen Leuven

Leuven, Vlaams Brabant, Belgium

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Joris R Vermeesch, Professor

Role: CONTACT

+32 16 345941

Thierry Voet, Professor

Role: CONTACT

+32 16 347991

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Joris R Vermeesch, Professor

Role: primary

+32 16 345941

Thierry Voet, Professor

Role: backup

+32 16 347991

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Vanneste E, Voet T, Le Caignec C, Ampe M, Konings P, Melotte C, Debrock S, Amyere M, Vikkula M, Schuit F, Fryns JP, Verbeke G, D'Hooghe T, Moreau Y, Vermeesch JR. Chromosome instability is common in human cleavage-stage embryos. Nat Med. 2009 May;15(5):577-83. doi: 10.1038/nm.1924. Epub 2009 Apr 26.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19396175 (View on PubMed)

Vanneste E, Voet T, Melotte C, Debrock S, Sermon K, Staessen C, Liebaers I, Fryns JP, D'Hooghe T, Vermeesch JR. What next for preimplantation genetic screening? High mitotic chromosome instability rate provides the biological basis for the low success rate. Hum Reprod. 2009 Nov;24(11):2679-82. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dep266. Epub 2009 Jul 24.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19633308 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IWT-TBM-090878

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Cell Free Preimplantation Genetic Testing
NCT04628507 NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Implantation Failure and PGD
NCT00547781 COMPLETED PHASE4