Analgesia in Labor, a Prospective Parallel Study to Compare Regional Analgesia and Intravenous (IV) Pethidine Analgesia
NCT ID: NCT01290289
Last Updated: 2011-02-07
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2009-07-31
2011-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Adding MgSO4 to Epidural Levobupivacaine in CS for Patients With Preeclampsia
NCT02699827
Combined Colloids And Crystalloids Versus Crystalloids in Women With Preeclampsia Undergoing Cesarean Delivery
NCT03252496
Combined Colloid Preload And Crystalloid Coload Versus Crystalloid Coload During Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery
NCT02961842
Prophylactic Perioperative Infusion of Ephedrine Versus Noradrenaline in Patients Undergoing Cesarean Delivery Under Spinal Anesthesia
NCT07067944
Norepinephrine to Prevent Hypotension in Ceasrean Delivery
NCT05248932
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This hospital per si was selected for the study because it is large hospital that could provide the study with a diverse population. It has a population of various socio-economic statuses. This would provide the study with a sample of patients with a wide range of characteristics.
Sixty full-term, ASA physical status I or II nulliparous women in active labor with cervical dilatation of 5 cm and cephalic presenting fetus were randomly assigned to one of five groups after providing informed consent.
* Group 1: received CSE analgesia, where 25 µg of fentanyl was injected intrathecally and a bolus dose of 10 ml of 0.5% lidocaine was injected epidurally. E top-ups of 5-10 ml of 0.5-0.8% lidocaine were then injected upon request.
* Group 2: received CSE analgesia, where 25 µg of fentanyl was injected intrathecally and a bolus dose of 10 ml of 0.0625% bupivacaine was injected epidurally. E top-ups of 5-10 ml of 0.0625-0.25% bupivacaine were then injected upon request.
* Group 3: received 50µg of E fentanyl analgesia which was injected intrathecally and a bolus of 10 ml of 0.5% lidocaine was administered through the catheter, followed by lidocaine E top-ups of 5-10 ml of 0.5-0.8% upon request.
* Group 4: received analgesia, where 50 µg of E fentanyl were injected intrathecally and a bolus dose of 10 ml of 0.125% bupivacaine was administered through the catheter, followed by E bupivacaine top-ups of 5-10 ml of 0.125-0.25% upon request.
* Group 5: 50 mg of IV pethidine was administered as a loading dose, followed by 0.5 mg/kg, with a total maximum limit of 130 mg.
Study Subjects Excluding Criteria Patients who had diabetes mellitus, neurological disease, pre-eclampsia, or patients who had received parenteral analgesics or patients with contraindication to E or spinal analgesia, or patients with sensitivity to local anesthetics or opioids were excluded from the study.
Study Method All the recruited subjects were screened before the administration of any analgesia. Systolic and diastolic pressures, heart rate and peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) were monitored. Fetal heart rate (FHR) was monitored using an external cardiotocograph monitor (Partoconter NST Nihon Kohden).
For the E groups, the degree of motor block was assessed according to a modified Bromage scale (Grade I: free movement of legs and feet; Grade II: just able to flex knees with free movement of feet; Grade III: unable to flex knees, but with free movements of feet; Grade IV: unable to move legs or feet) before administration of E analgesia, 10 and 30 minutes after the first dose. The start of the analgesia was regarded as time 0. The duration of analgesia was taken as the time from the beginning of analgesic injection (time 0) to the time of request for additional analgesia.
The number of analgesic top-ups was recorded and the intervals between each top-up, in addition to the volume and concentration of the drug injected.
The Visual Analogue Pain Scale (VAS) (0 mm = no pain, 100 mm = worst pain imaginable) was measured before administration of analgesia, 10 and 30 minutes after administration of each analgesic dose until the delivery of the baby.
Maternal arterial pressures, heart rate, SpO2, and FHR were noted before the analgesia was given, and afterwards every 30 minutes until delivery.
Maternal temperature was recorded before starting the analgesic regimen and thereafter every hour till the end of labor. Fever was defined as temperature of ≥ 38˚C.
The duration of each stage of labor together with the mode of delivery were recorded.
The total volume of drug injected, total concentration of drug injected, 1-min and 5-min APGAR scores, weight of the neonate were recorded.
Any experienced drug related problem by any of the recruited subjects were recorded.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Epidura, combined spinal epidura & IV
Gp 1: received CSE analgesia, 25µg of fentanyl injected intrathecally \& a bolus of 10 ml of 0.5% lidocaine injected epidurally.
Gp 2: received CSE analgesia, 25µg of fentanyl injected intrathecally \& a bolus of 10 ml of 0.0625% bupivacaine injected epidurally.
Gp 3: received 50µg of E fentanyl analgesia, injected intrathecally \& a bolus of 10 ml of 0.5% lidocaine, followed by lidocaine E top-ups.
Gp 4: received 50µg of E fentanyl injected intrathecally and a bolus dose of 10 ml of 0.125% bupivacaine, followed by E bupivacaine top-ups.
Gp 5: 50mg of IV pethidine was administered as a loading dose, followed by 0.5 mg/kg.
Epidura, CSE & IV
Gp 1: received CSE analgesia: 25µg of fentanyl \& a bolus dose of 10 ml of 0.5% lidocaine was injected epidurally. E top-ups of 5-10 ml of 0.5-0.8% lidocaine were then injected.
Gp 2: received CSE analgesia: 25µg of fentanyl \& a bolus dose of 10 ml of 0.0625% bupivacaine was injected epidurally. E top-ups of 5-10 ml of 0.0625-0.25% bupivacaine were then injected.
Gp 3: received 50µg of E fentanyl analgesia \& a bolus of 10 ml of 0.5% lidocaine was administered, followed by lidocaine E top-ups of 5-10 ml of 0.5-0.8%.
Gp 4: received analgesia: 50µg of E fentanyl \& a bolus dose of 10 ml of 0.125% bupivacaine was administered, followed by E bupivacaine top-ups of 5-10 ml of 0.125-0.25%.
Gp 5: 50mg of IV pethidine was administered as loading dose, followed by 0.5 mg/kg.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Epidura, CSE & IV
Gp 1: received CSE analgesia: 25µg of fentanyl \& a bolus dose of 10 ml of 0.5% lidocaine was injected epidurally. E top-ups of 5-10 ml of 0.5-0.8% lidocaine were then injected.
Gp 2: received CSE analgesia: 25µg of fentanyl \& a bolus dose of 10 ml of 0.0625% bupivacaine was injected epidurally. E top-ups of 5-10 ml of 0.0625-0.25% bupivacaine were then injected.
Gp 3: received 50µg of E fentanyl analgesia \& a bolus of 10 ml of 0.5% lidocaine was administered, followed by lidocaine E top-ups of 5-10 ml of 0.5-0.8%.
Gp 4: received analgesia: 50µg of E fentanyl \& a bolus dose of 10 ml of 0.125% bupivacaine was administered, followed by E bupivacaine top-ups of 5-10 ml of 0.125-0.25%.
Gp 5: 50mg of IV pethidine was administered as loading dose, followed by 0.5 mg/kg.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
45 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Cairo University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Cairo University
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Nirmeen Sabry, Ph.D
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Cairo University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
El-Galaa Hospital
Cairo, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
6111972
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.