A Comparison of Different Concentration Ropivacaine for Patient-controlled Epidural Analgesia
NCT ID: NCT03195309
Last Updated: 2017-06-22
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
PHASE1/PHASE2
120 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-01-20
2019-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Postoperative Pain Management of Caesarean Section
NCT05009771
Comparison of the Time to the First Rescue Analgesic Among Parturients Receiving Intrathecal Additive Fentanyl or Intrathecal Fentanyl With TAP Block or TAP Block Alone for Elective Cesarean Sections Under Hyperbaric Bupivacaine Spinal Anesthesia
NCT05550597
Dose-response Study of Spinally Administered Ropivacaine for Caesarean Section in Tall Parturients
NCT03936790
Analgesia Effects of Intravenous Ketamine After Spinal Anesthesia for Non-elective Cesarean Section
NCT03450499
The Comparison Of Nerve Blocks In Cesarean Delivery
NCT03333902
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
2. All patients were received epidural anesthesia with 2% Lidocaine and patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) for post- operative pain control. PCEA randomly allocated into three groups. Group A patients received 0.08% ropivacaine plus 4 mcg /mL fentanyl, Group B patients received 0.08% ropivacaine plus 2mcg /mL fentanyl, and Group C patients received 0.16 % ropivacaine plus 2 mcg /mL fentanyl. Dermographic data, dosage of PCEA during first 48 hours post-operation,NRS scores, patient satisfaction and the intensity of motor block will be recorded and analyzed.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group A
Group A patients received 0.08% ropivacaine plus 4 mcg /mL fentanyl
Ropivacaine
Compare different concentration of ropivacaine and fentanyl for elective Cesarean delivery post operative pain control.
Fentanyl
Compare different concentration of ropivacaine and fentanyl for elective Cesarean delivery post operative pain control.
Group B
Group B patients received 0.08% ropivacaine plus 2mcg /mL fentanyl
Ropivacaine
Compare different concentration of ropivacaine and fentanyl for elective Cesarean delivery post operative pain control.
Fentanyl
Compare different concentration of ropivacaine and fentanyl for elective Cesarean delivery post operative pain control.
Group C
Group C patients received 0.16 % ropivacaine plus 2 mcg /mL fentanyl
Ropivacaine
Compare different concentration of ropivacaine and fentanyl for elective Cesarean delivery post operative pain control.
Fentanyl
Compare different concentration of ropivacaine and fentanyl for elective Cesarean delivery post operative pain control.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Ropivacaine
Compare different concentration of ropivacaine and fentanyl for elective Cesarean delivery post operative pain control.
Fentanyl
Compare different concentration of ropivacaine and fentanyl for elective Cesarean delivery post operative pain control.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
20 Years
45 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Hui-Fang Huang
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Kaohsiung Medical University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital
Kaohsiung City, , Taiwan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
KMUHIRB-F(1)-20160019
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.