A Comparison of Different Concentration Ropivacaine for Patient-controlled Epidural Analgesia

NCT ID: NCT03195309

Last Updated: 2017-06-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE1/PHASE2

Total Enrollment

120 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-01-20

Study Completion Date

2019-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To compare the postoperative analgesic effect and the intensity of motor block in different concentration ropivacaine plus fentanyl when used epidurally with a patient-controlled analgesia device after Cesarean delivery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

1. Written informed consent must be obtained before any study specific procedures are undertaken.
2. All patients were received epidural anesthesia with 2% Lidocaine and patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) for post- operative pain control. PCEA randomly allocated into three groups. Group A patients received 0.08% ropivacaine plus 4 mcg /mL fentanyl, Group B patients received 0.08% ropivacaine plus 2mcg /mL fentanyl, and Group C patients received 0.16 % ropivacaine plus 2 mcg /mL fentanyl. Dermographic data, dosage of PCEA during first 48 hours post-operation,NRS scores, patient satisfaction and the intensity of motor block will be recorded and analyzed.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Epidural Anesthesia Cesarean Section

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

All patients were received epidural anesthesia with 2% Lidocaine and patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) for post- operative pain control. PCEA randomly allocated into three groups. Group A patients received 0.08% ropivacaine plus 4 mcg /mL fentanyl, Group B patients received 0.08% ropivacaine plus 2mcg /mL fentanyl, and Group C patients received 0.16 % ropivacaine plus 2 mcg /mL fentanyl. Dermographic data, dosage of PCEA during first 48 hours post-operation,NRS scores, patient satisfaction and the intensity of motor block will be recorded and analyzed.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators
Participant do not know which formula they are receive. Nor do the daily care providers.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group A

Group A patients received 0.08% ropivacaine plus 4 mcg /mL fentanyl

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Ropivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

Compare different concentration of ropivacaine and fentanyl for elective Cesarean delivery post operative pain control.

Fentanyl

Intervention Type DRUG

Compare different concentration of ropivacaine and fentanyl for elective Cesarean delivery post operative pain control.

Group B

Group B patients received 0.08% ropivacaine plus 2mcg /mL fentanyl

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Ropivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

Compare different concentration of ropivacaine and fentanyl for elective Cesarean delivery post operative pain control.

Fentanyl

Intervention Type DRUG

Compare different concentration of ropivacaine and fentanyl for elective Cesarean delivery post operative pain control.

Group C

Group C patients received 0.16 % ropivacaine plus 2 mcg /mL fentanyl

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Ropivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

Compare different concentration of ropivacaine and fentanyl for elective Cesarean delivery post operative pain control.

Fentanyl

Intervention Type DRUG

Compare different concentration of ropivacaine and fentanyl for elective Cesarean delivery post operative pain control.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ropivacaine

Compare different concentration of ropivacaine and fentanyl for elective Cesarean delivery post operative pain control.

Intervention Type DRUG

Fentanyl

Compare different concentration of ropivacaine and fentanyl for elective Cesarean delivery post operative pain control.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Ropica

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Female undergoing elective Cesarean delivery and receive patient-controlled epidural analgesia

Exclusion Criteria

* With the comorbidity of chronic heart, lung, liver and renal disease, chronic alcoholism, allergy to ropivacaine, poor epidural function and combine other anesthesia method
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

45 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Hui-Fang Huang

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Kaohsiung Medical University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital

Kaohsiung City, , Taiwan

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Taiwan

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

KMUHIRB-F(1)-20160019

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.