Comparison of Dural Puncture Epidural and Standard Epidural Anesthesia Techniques in Elective Cesarean Deliveries

NCT ID: NCT07295080

Last Updated: 2025-12-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2026-01-01

Study Completion Date

2026-05-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Neuraxial techniques are the most effective form of labor analgesia in contemporary obstetric anesthesia practice, predominantly through the use of epidural (EPL) and combined spinal-epidural (CSE) techniques. Although drug combinations employed in these methods have advanced, the onset time, block quality, and side effect profiles of both techniques still require further improvement.

The epidural technique is associated with minimal side effects; however, it may occasionally present variable block characteristics such as slow onset, inadequate sacral spread, unilateral or patchy sensory block, motor impairment, and epidural catheter failure.

The dural puncture epidural (DPE) technique is performed by inserting a spinal needle through the shaft of the epidural needle to create a single dural perforation, after which an epidural catheter is placed into the epidural space without administering any drugs into the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). All medications for analgesia or anesthesia are delivered into the epidural space via the catheter. The dural puncture is thought to provide a conduit that facilitates the translocation of drugs from the epidural space into the subarachnoid space, which is believed to account for the clinical features observed with the dural puncture epidural technique advantageous in obstetric patients. Additionally, the process of dural puncture with a spinal needle through the epidural needle allows cerebrospinal fluid return to serve as a "confirmatory" definitive endpoint for the position of the epidural needle tip within the epidural space.

The investigators designed this study to determine whether the dural puncture epidural technique, compared with epidural, could improve the onset time and block characteristics of anesthesia in elective cesarean deliveries.

Compared with the epidural technique, the dural puncture epidural approach has been shown to improve the onset of sacral block as well as the spread of anesthesia and analgesia-characteristics that are particularly advantageous in obstetric patients. Additionally, the process of dural puncture with a spinal needle through the epidural needle allows cerebrospinal fluid return to serve as a "confirmatory" definitive endpoint for the position of the epidural needle tip within the epidural space.

The investigators designed this study to determine whether the dural puncture epidural technique, compared with epidural, could improve the onset time and block characteristics of anesthesia in elective cesarean deliveries.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study aims to evaluate the effects of dural puncture epidural (DPE) versus standard epidural anesthesia on the time to surgical anesthesia onset in patients scheduled for elective cesarean section.

• Study Population:

Pregnant women undergoing elective cesarean section

• Compared Techniques:

Dural Puncture Epidural Group → A dural puncture will be performed with a 27G spinal needle before the placement of the epidural catheter.

Standard Epidural Group → An epidural catheter will be placed directly without dural puncture.

• Primary Outcome:

Time from anesthesia administration to onset of surgical anesthesia (defined as time to achieve sensory block at the T5 dermatome level).

• Secondary Outcomes:

Incidence of hypotension

Intraoperative ephedrine requirement

Need for additional doses

Post-dural puncture headache (PDPH)

Time to regression of sensory block

Motor block assessment (Bromage scale)

Study Design:

Prospective: Patients will be identified before anesthesia administration and evaluated going forward.

Randomized: Patients will be randomly assigned to either the dural ponksiyon epidural or standard epidural group.

Controlled: The two groups will be compared to analyze the effects.

Single-Center: The study will be conducted at a single hospital. Inclusion Criteria

* Women scheduled for elective cesarean delivery
* No comorbidities
* Age between 18-40 years
* Body mass index (BMI) \< 35 kg/m²
* Term pregnancy ≥ 37 weeks
* No contraindications to neuraxial anesthesia (e.g., coagulopathy, infection, history of prior spinal surgery, etc.)

Parameters to Be Assessed

All parameters will be assessed by the investigator both intraoperatively and postoperatively in the ward. These include:

* Sensory block level (evaluated every minute as a study-specific parameter)
* Blood pressure
* Heart rate
* Oxygen saturation
* Requirement for ephedrine
* Requirement for additional epidural doses
* Incidence of post-dural puncture headache (at 24 and 48 hours)
* Motor block assessment (using the Bromage Scale)

Note: All evaluated parameters are part of standard monitoring, with the exception that sensory block level will be specifically assessed every minute for the purposes of this study.

\-

Exclusion Criteria

* Contraindications to neuraxial anesthesia
* Refusal to participate in the study

Withdrawal and Termination Criteria

* Patient's decision to withdraw from the study
* Conversion to general anesthesia
* Administration of intrathecal and/or intravenous drugs

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Regional Anaesthesia in Cesarean Operations

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

dural puncture epidural anesthesia epidural anesthesia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

dural puncture epidural

The epidural space will be accessed using an 18G epidural needle, followed by dural puncture with a 27G spinal needle. Without administering any drug into the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), an epidural catheter will then be inserted, through which anesthesia will be administered.Its placement will be confirmed with a test dose of 2 ml of 2% lidocaine. Following the test dose (after excluding signs of intrathecal or intravenous injection), a mixture consisting of 7.5 ml of 2% prilocaine, 7.5 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine, and 100 µg of fentanyl (2 ml) will be administered in 5-ml increments at 3-minute intervals. At the completion of the injection (t0), the patient will be placed in the supine position with a 10-degree left tilt. Sensory block level will be assessed every minute using the pinprick test. Bilateral sensory block at the T5 dermatome will be accepted as adequate surgical anaesthesia.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Dural puncture epidural (DPE) anaesthesia

Intervention Type OTHER

The epidural space will be accessed using an 18G epidural needle, followed by dural puncture with a 27G spinal needle. Without administering any drug into the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), an epidural catheter will then be inserted, through which anesthesia will be administered.Its placement will be confirmed with a test dose of 2 ml of 2% lidocaine. Following the test dose (after excluding signs of intrathecal or intravenous injection), a mixture consisting of 7.5 ml of 2% prilocaine, 7.5 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine, and 100 µg of fentanyl (2 ml) will be administered in 5-ml increments at 3-minute intervals.

standart epidural anesthesia

The epidural space will be accessed using an 18G epidural needle. An epidural catheter will then be inserted, through which anesthesia will be administered.Its placement will be confirmed with a test dose of 2 ml of 2% lidocaine. Following the test dose (after excluding signs of intrathecal or intravenous injection), a mixture consisting of 7.5 ml of 2% prilocaine, 7.5 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine, and 100 µg of fentanyl (2 ml) will be administered in 5-ml increments at 3-minute intervals. At the completion of the injection (t0), the patient will be placed in the supine position with a 10-degree left tilt. Sensory block level will be assessed every minute using the pinprick test. Bilateral sensory block at the T5 dermatome will be accepted as adequate surgical anaesthesia.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

standart epidural anesthesia

Intervention Type OTHER

The epidural space will be accessed using an 18G epidural needle. An epidural catheter will then be inserted, through which anesthesia will be administered.Its placement will be confirmed with a test dose of 2 ml of 2% lidocaine. Following the test dose (after excluding signs of intrathecal or intravenous injection), a mixture consisting of 7.5 ml of 2% prilocaine, 7.5 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine, and 100 µg of fentanyl (2 ml) will be administered in 5-ml increments at 3-minute intervals.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Dural puncture epidural (DPE) anaesthesia

The epidural space will be accessed using an 18G epidural needle, followed by dural puncture with a 27G spinal needle. Without administering any drug into the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), an epidural catheter will then be inserted, through which anesthesia will be administered.Its placement will be confirmed with a test dose of 2 ml of 2% lidocaine. Following the test dose (after excluding signs of intrathecal or intravenous injection), a mixture consisting of 7.5 ml of 2% prilocaine, 7.5 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine, and 100 µg of fentanyl (2 ml) will be administered in 5-ml increments at 3-minute intervals.

Intervention Type OTHER

standart epidural anesthesia

The epidural space will be accessed using an 18G epidural needle. An epidural catheter will then be inserted, through which anesthesia will be administered.Its placement will be confirmed with a test dose of 2 ml of 2% lidocaine. Following the test dose (after excluding signs of intrathecal or intravenous injection), a mixture consisting of 7.5 ml of 2% prilocaine, 7.5 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine, and 100 µg of fentanyl (2 ml) will be administered in 5-ml increments at 3-minute intervals.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Women scheduled for elective cesarean delivery

* No comorbidities
* Age between 18-40 years
* Body mass index (BMI) \< 35 kg/m²
* Term pregnancy ≥ 37 weeks
* No contraindications to neuraxial anesthesia (e.g., coagulopathy, infection, history of prior spinal surgery, etc.)

Exclusion Criteria

* Contraindications to neuraxial anesthesia

* Refusal to participate in the study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

40 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ankara City Hospital Bilkent

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Esra Uyar Türkyılmaz

associate professor,MD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

esra uyar turkyilmaz

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Ankara City Hospital Bilkent

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Ankara city hospital

Ankara, çankaya, Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

ozlem bayrak

Role: CONTACT

Phone: +905558487653

Email: [email protected]

esra uyar türkyılmaz

Role: CONTACT

Phone: +905053840429

Email: [email protected]

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Horcajada JP, Martinez JA, Moreno-Martinez A, Mensa J, Almela M, Soriano E. [Predictive factors of the presence of bacteremia in males with urinary infection]. Med Clin (Barc). 1999 May 29;112(19):734-5. Spanish.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10394571 (View on PubMed)

Tarraga P, Garcia-Olmo D, Celada A, Garcia-Molinero Mf, Divison JA, Casado C. Colorectal cancer screening through detection of fecal occult blood in a controlled health zone. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 1999 May;91(5):335-44. English, Spanish.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10362875 (View on PubMed)

Chau A, Bibbo C, Huang CC, Elterman KG, Cappiello EC, Robinson JN, Tsen LC. Dural Puncture Epidural Technique Improves Labor Analgesia Quality With Fewer Side Effects Compared With Epidural and Combined Spinal Epidural Techniques: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Anesth Analg. 2017 Feb;124(2):560-569. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001798.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28067707 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1251153

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id