LANDA Embryo Freezing Technique.

NCT ID: NCT01271400

Last Updated: 2011-09-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-12-31

Study Completion Date

2012-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this study is to track the outcome from the patients who had embryo cryopreservation as part of their Advanced Reproductive Technology (ART) treatment at West Coast Fertility Centers.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Over the past several decades, considerable effort has been expended toward the successful cryopreservation of various human cells. While attempts at cryopreservation have been directed at different tissue types, one of the most vigorously pursued targets has been reproductive tissue. Historically, cryopreservation of human sperm has existed for several decades. The earliest reports of pregnancies (Trounson et al., 1983) and births (Zeilmaker et al., 1984) from the cryopreservation of human embryos occurred in the early 1980s. Presently, the freezing and storage of human embryos following in vitro fertilization (IVF) is standard practice at most fertility clinics. In 2003, the CDC Assisted Reproductive Technology success rates report stated that 4,246 live births occurred out of 17,517 non-donor frozen embryo cycles.

Embryo cryopreservation has been a routine component of clinical IVF programs for more than 2 decades but has a relatively poor outcome in terms of post-thaw survival and pregnancy rates in a majority of IVF programs. Efficient embryo cryopreservation has several advantages. It helps to reduce costs and increases cumulative pregnancy rates. It can also help in cases of IVF cycles where embryos are not transferred due to ovarian hyper stimulation syndrome. It is also useful when technical difficulties are encountered at the time of an embryo transfer procedure.

One of the major concerns in IVF is high-order multiple pregnancies, which result from the transfer of multiple embryos in a given cycle. In the last 5 years, improved stimulation protocols, advances in culture and laboratory systems, and better identification of viable embryos have enhanced the success rates of IVF. During the same period, some clinics have started the practice of transferring two embryos to reduce multiple pregnancy rates without compromising overall pregnancy rates.

Furthermore, in recent years some European countries, particularly the Scandinavian countries, have taken a lead in performing elective single-embryo transfers and have achieved acceptable pregnancy rates. This trend is spreading to other countries. This can result in surplus embryos being available for freezing. With the application of ICSI, even patients aged 40 years or older may have embryos to freeze.

Review of the current literature reveals modest post-thaw embryo survival, implantation, and pregnancy rates. Post-thaw survival rates vary from 50% to 80% for different embryo stages. Implantation and pregnancy rates have varied from 3% to 15% and 15% to 25% respectively, which is approximately half of the rates achieved for fresh embryo transfers.

To improve the outcome of frozen ET cycles, we modified various steps of our standard cryopreservation protocol. In a pilot study on arrested and fragmented embryos (grades 3 and 4), we achieved post-thaw survival rates of 92%, having all blastomeres intact. Encouraged by the post-thaw survival of these embryos; we propose using this modified protocol in our frozen embryo transfer program.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Primary Infertility Secondary Infertility Genital Diseases, Male Genital Diseases, Female

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_ONLY

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* To be eligible for inclusion into this study, each subject must satisfy the following criteria:

1. Infertile women whose physician has recommended IVF and who agree to cryopreserve surplus embryos.
2. Cancer patients who wish to preserve their fertility prior to cancer treatments.
3. Recipients who wish to use frozen donor embryos.
4. A male partner whose semen analysis meets the clinic criteria for ICSI. Use of donor sperm is also acceptable.
5. Be willing and able to comply with the protocol for the duration of the study.
6. Have voluntarily provided written informed consent under WIRB.

Exclusion Criteria

* A patient may NOT be entered into the study if she presents with ANY of the following criteria:

1. Clinically significant systemic disease.
2. Known endometriosis Grade III - IV (ASRM classification).
3. Any previous cycle indicating a low response to gonadotropin stimulation (defined as retrieval of \< 10 eggs at retrieval)
4. Three or more previous ART cycles without a clinical pregnancy
5. Abnormal, undiagnosed, gynecological bleeding.
6. Previous ovarian surgery
7. Known allergy or hypersensitivity to recombinant gonadotropin preparations or any other study-related medications.
8. Verifiable substance abuse.
9. Simultaneous participation in another study protocol.
10. Current smoker.
11. An extrauterine pregnancy within the last 3 months before OCP treatment commences.
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

37 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

West Coast Fertility Centers

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

David G. Diaz, MD

Medical Director

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

David G. Diaz, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

West Coast Fertility Centers

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

West Coast Fertility Centers

Fountain Valley, California, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2010-1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.