Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
746 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-06-30
2014-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Sutures vs. Staples Skin Closure After C-section in Obese Patients
NCT01820221
A Clinical Trial of Subcuticular Staples Versus Subcuticular Suture for Cesarean Section Skin Closure
NCT01753518
A Study Comparing Two Different Techniques for Closing the Skin After a Cesarean Delivery
NCT00293683
Staples Versus Suture for Cesarean Wound Closure
NCT01008449
Cesarean Wound Closure in Women With BMI 40 or Greater
NCT02549131
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Staples
Interrupted Ethicon Staples
Staples
Interrupted Ethicon Staples
Suture
Subcuticular continuous suture (4-0 Monocryl Plus on PS2 needle or 4-0 Vicryl Plus on FS2 or PS2 needle)
Suture
Subcuticular continuous suture (4-0 Monocryl Plus on PS2 needle or 4-0 Vicryl Plus on FS2 or PS2 needle)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Staples
Interrupted Ethicon Staples
Suture
Subcuticular continuous suture (4-0 Monocryl Plus on PS2 needle or 4-0 Vicryl Plus on FS2 or PS2 needle)
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Vertical skin incisions
* Chronic steroid use
* Active lupus flare
* HIV/AIDS
* Current treatment for cancer or a history of radiation to the abdomen/pelvis
* Current treatment with immunosuppressant medications secondary to history of transplantation
* Emergency cesarean(precluding informed consent prior to surgery)
* Lack of access to a phone
* Allergy to suture or staple material
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Main Line Health
OTHER
Thomas Jefferson University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
A. Dhanya Mackeen, MD, MPH
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Thomas Jefferson University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Yale University
New Haven, Connecticut, United States
Thomas Jefferson University Hospital
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Rousseau JA, Girard K, Turcot-Lemay L, Thomas N. A randomized study comparing skin closure in cesarean sections: staples vs subcuticular sutures. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Mar;200(3):265.e1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.01.019.
Frishman GN, Schwartz T, Hogan JW. Closure of Pfannenstiel skin incisions. Staples vs. subcuticular suture. J Reprod Med. 1997 Oct;42(10):627-30.
Alderdice F, McKenna D, Dornan J. Techniques and materials for skin closure in caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;(2):CD003577. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003577.
Basha SL, Rochon ML, Quinones JN, Coassolo KM, Rust OA, Smulian JC. Randomized controlled trial of wound complication rates of subcuticular suture vs staples for skin closure at cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Sep;203(3):285.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.07.011.
Mackeen AD, Khalifeh A, Fleisher J, Han C, Leiby B, Berghella V. Pain Associated With Cesarean Delivery Skin Closure: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Oct;126(4):702-707. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001043.
Mackeen AD, Khalifeh A, Fleisher J, Vogell A, Han C, Sendecki J, Pettker C, Leiby BE, Baxter JK, Sfakianaki A, Berghella V. Suture compared with staple skin closure after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jun;123(6):1169-1175. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000227.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
10D.199
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.