Cesarean Trial of Staples vs. Sutures

NCT ID: NCT01211600

Last Updated: 2019-11-26

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

746 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-06-30

Study Completion Date

2014-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To determine whether the rate of wound complications differs based on method of closure of skin incision (staples vs. suture) after cesarean delivery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Despite this large number of cesareans performed annually, there is a paucity of data to suggest which technique is superior for closure of the skin incision with regards to wound complications, including wound separation and infection. As the morbidity associated with a cesarean delivery is usually related to wound complications, especially infection, we feel that it is important to examine this outcome by comparing the current skin closure techniques: staples versus suture.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cesarean Section Wound Complications Patient Satisfaction Pain Measurement

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Staples

Interrupted Ethicon Staples

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Staples

Intervention Type OTHER

Interrupted Ethicon Staples

Suture

Subcuticular continuous suture (4-0 Monocryl Plus on PS2 needle or 4-0 Vicryl Plus on FS2 or PS2 needle)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Suture

Intervention Type OTHER

Subcuticular continuous suture (4-0 Monocryl Plus on PS2 needle or 4-0 Vicryl Plus on FS2 or PS2 needle)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Staples

Interrupted Ethicon Staples

Intervention Type OTHER

Suture

Subcuticular continuous suture (4-0 Monocryl Plus on PS2 needle or 4-0 Vicryl Plus on FS2 or PS2 needle)

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Closure Technique Closure Technique

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Women undergoing cesarean delivery for pregnancy greater than 23 weeks gestation.

Exclusion Criteria

* Poorly controlled diabetes (defined as ≥ 50% of fasting or 2 hour postprandial glucose levels \> 95 and 120 respectively within the week prior to delivery),
* Vertical skin incisions
* Chronic steroid use
* Active lupus flare
* HIV/AIDS
* Current treatment for cancer or a history of radiation to the abdomen/pelvis
* Current treatment with immunosuppressant medications secondary to history of transplantation
* Emergency cesarean(precluding informed consent prior to surgery)
* Lack of access to a phone
* Allergy to suture or staple material
Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Main Line Health

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Thomas Jefferson University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

A. Dhanya Mackeen, MD, MPH

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Thomas Jefferson University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Yale University

New Haven, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Thomas Jefferson University Hospital

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Rousseau JA, Girard K, Turcot-Lemay L, Thomas N. A randomized study comparing skin closure in cesarean sections: staples vs subcuticular sutures. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Mar;200(3):265.e1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.01.019.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19254586 (View on PubMed)

Frishman GN, Schwartz T, Hogan JW. Closure of Pfannenstiel skin incisions. Staples vs. subcuticular suture. J Reprod Med. 1997 Oct;42(10):627-30.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9350017 (View on PubMed)

Alderdice F, McKenna D, Dornan J. Techniques and materials for skin closure in caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;(2):CD003577. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003577.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12804476 (View on PubMed)

Basha SL, Rochon ML, Quinones JN, Coassolo KM, Rust OA, Smulian JC. Randomized controlled trial of wound complication rates of subcuticular suture vs staples for skin closure at cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Sep;203(3):285.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.07.011.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20816153 (View on PubMed)

Mackeen AD, Khalifeh A, Fleisher J, Han C, Leiby B, Berghella V. Pain Associated With Cesarean Delivery Skin Closure: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Oct;126(4):702-707. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001043.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 26348166 (View on PubMed)

Mackeen AD, Khalifeh A, Fleisher J, Vogell A, Han C, Sendecki J, Pettker C, Leiby BE, Baxter JK, Sfakianaki A, Berghella V. Suture compared with staple skin closure after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jun;123(6):1169-1175. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000227.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 24807325 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

10D.199

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Skin Glue Cesarean Study
NCT05903547 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA