A Study of RoActemra/Actemra (Tocilizumab) in Patients With Ankylosing Spondylitis Who Have Failed Treatment With NSAIDs
NCT ID: NCT01209702
Last Updated: 2013-02-11
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
PHASE3
306 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-09-30
2011-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Study of Tocilizumab (RoActemra/Actemra) in Patients With Ankylosing Spondylitis Who Have Had an Inadequate Response to Previous Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) Antagonist Therapy
NCT01209689
A Study of RoActemra/Actemra (Tocilizumab) in Combination With DMARDs Versus Current Best Practice DMARD Therapy in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis
NCT01251120
A Study Of Tocilizumab in Patients With Moderate to Severe Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Who Have an Inadequate Response to or Are Unable to Tolerate Biologic and Non-Biologic Disease-modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (DMARDs)
NCT00891020
A Study of RoActemra/Actemra (Tocilizumab) Given Subcutaneously in Combination With Traditional DMARDs in Patients With Moderate to Severe Active Rheumatoid Arthritis
NCT01232569
A Study of Tocilizumab Plus Non-biological DMARD in Patients With Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis and an Inadequate Response to Non-biological DMARDs
NCT01034397
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Part 1 was designed as a Phase II study exploring the efficacy and safety of tocilizumab therapy versus placebo. Part 1 was intended to determine whether Part 2 of the study would continue, based on a Week 12 analysis.
Part 2 was designed to provide pivotal Phase III efficacy and safety data for tocilizumab in patients with AS. Approximately 400 patients were to be enrolled. Once randomization into Part 1 was complete, randomization into Part 2 of the study was to be initiated.
Based on the results of the Week 12 Part 1 analyses of the primary endpoint (ASAS20) and secondary endpoints, and in consideration of all available safety data, a benefit/risk assessment was made and it was decided to halt the study because of lack of overall efficacy. Most patients did not complete the 24-week double-blind treatment period in Part 2.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Part 1: Placebo
Participants received intravenous infusions of placebo once every 4 weeks until Week 12. Following the Week 12 visit, participants who completed Part 1 of the study received open-label 8 mg/kg tocilizumab through Week 208.
Placebo
Placebo to tocilizumab administered intravenously every 4 weeks
Part 1: Tocilizumab
Participants received intravenous infusions of 8 mg/kg tocilizumab once every 4 weeks until Week 12. Following the Week 12 visit, participants who completed Part 1 of the study received open-label 8 mg/kg tocilizumab through Week 208.
tocilizumab
Administered intravenously (iv) every 4 weeks
Part 2: Placebo
Participants received intravenous infusions of placebo once every 4 weeks until Week 24. Participants who did not attain an ASsessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis-20 (ASAS20) response at Week 16 were, at the investigator's discretion, eligible to receive open-label escape therapy consisting of 8 mg/kg tocilizumab. After Week 24, participants were to receive open-label treatment with 8 mg/kg tocilizumab every 4 weeks until Week 104. At the completion of Week 104, all Part 2 participants were to receive tocilizumab 8 mg/kg in the common open-label extension phase, however the study was terminated prior to any participants reaching this stage.
Placebo
Placebo to tocilizumab administered intravenously every 4 weeks
Part 2: Tocilizumab 4 mg/kg
Participants received intravenous infusions of 4 mg/kg tocilizumab once every 4 weeks until Week 24. Participants who did not attain an ASAS20 response at Week 16 were, at the investigator's discretion, eligible to receive open-label escape therapy consisting of 8 mg/kg tocilizumab. After Week 24, participants were to receive open-label treatment with 8 mg/kg tocilizumab every 4 weeks until Week 104. At the completion of Week 104, all Part 2 participants were to receive tocilizumab 8 mg/kg in the common open-label extension phase, however the study was terminated prior to any participants reaching this stage.
tocilizumab
Administered intravenously (iv) every 4 weeks
Part 2: Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg
Participants received intravenous infusions of 8 mg/kg tocilizumab once every 4 weeks until Week 24. Participants who did not attain an ASAS20 response at Week 16 were, at the investigator's discretion, eligible to receive open-label escape therapy consisting of 8 mg/kg tocilizumab. After Week 24, participants were to receive open-label treatment with 8 mg/kg tocilizumab every 4 weeks until Week 104. At the completion of Week 104, all Part 2 participants were to receive tocilizumab 8 mg/kg in the common open-label extension phase, however the study was terminated prior to any participants reaching this stage.
tocilizumab
Administered intravenously (iv) every 4 weeks
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
tocilizumab
Administered intravenously (iv) every 4 weeks
Placebo
Placebo to tocilizumab administered intravenously every 4 weeks
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Ankylosing Spondylitis as defined by the modified New York criteria for ≥ 3 months prior to baseline
* Active disease at screening and baseline (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index \[BASDAI\] ≥4.0, spinal pain visual analog scale \[VAS\] ≥40)
* Inadequate response or intolerant to 1 or more previous non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)
* Traditional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) must be withdrawn for at least 4 weeks prior to baseline (methotrexate, sulfasalazine and hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine may be allowed if at stable dose for at least 4 weeks prior to baseline)
* Oral corticosteroids (≥ 10 mg/day prednisone or equivalent) and NSAIDs/COX-2 inhibitors must be at stable dose for at least 4 weeks prior to baseline
Exclusion Criteria
* Total ankylosis of spine (as determined by investigator)
* Inflammatory rheumatic disease other than ankylosing spondylitis
* Active, acute uveitis at baseline
* Treatment with tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonist therapy at any time prior to baseline
* Intra-articular or tendon injections or parenteral corticosteroids within 4 weeks prior to screening
* History of severe allergic or anaphylactic reactions to humanized or murine monoclonal antibodies
* Active current or history of recurrent bacterial, viral, fungal, mycobacterial or other infection
* History of or currently active primary or secondary immunodeficiency
* Body weight \> 150 kg
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hoffmann-La Roche
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Clinical Trials
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Hoffmann-La Roche
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Huntington Beach, California, United States
Aventura, Florida, United States
Orlando, Florida, United States
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Decatur, Georgia, United States
Marietta, Georgia, United States
Idaho Falls, Idaho, United States
Wichita, Kansas, United States
Cumberland, Maryland, United States
Saint Claire Shores, Michigan, United States
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
Greensboro, North Carolina, United States
Duncansville, Pennsylvania, United States
Hickory Grove, South Carolina, United States
Houston, Texas, United States
Adelaide, , Australia
Heidelberg, , Australia
Hobart, , Australia
Malvern East, , Australia
Maroochydore, , Australia
Sydney, , Australia
Woodville, , Australia
Brussels, , Belgium
Kortrijk, , Belgium
Liège, , Belgium
Yvoir, , Belgium
Cuiabá, , Brazil
Goiânia, , Brazil
São Paulo, , Brazil
São Paulo, , Brazil
São Paulo, , Brazil
Plovdiv, , Bulgaria
Plovdiv, , Bulgaria
Rousse, , Bulgaria
Sevlievo, , Bulgaria
Sofia, , Bulgaria
Sofia, , Bulgaria
Sofia, , Bulgaria
Sofia, , Bulgaria
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
Kitchener, Ontario, Canada
Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Québec, Quebec, Canada
Sainte-Foy, Quebec, Canada
Trois-Rivières, Quebec, Canada
Bruntál, , Czechia
Hlučín, , Czechia
Olomouc, , Czechia
Prague, , Czechia
Prague, , Czechia
Prague, , Czechia
Praha 4 Nusle, , Czechia
Sokolov, , Czechia
Uherské Hradiště, , Czechia
Zlín, , Czechia
Besançon, , France
Boulogne-Billancourt, , France
Créteil, , France
Grenoble, , France
Montpellier, , France
Paris, , France
Strasbourg, , France
Toulouse, , France
Berlin, , Germany
Berlin, , Germany
Cologne, , Germany
Gommern, , Germany
Hanover, , Germany
Würzburg, , Germany
Ahmedabad, , India
Bangalore, , India
Bangalore, , India
Bangalore, , India
Bangalore, , India
Hyderabad, , India
Jaipur, , India
New Delhi, , India
New Delhi, , India
Secunderabad, , India
Ferrara, , Italy
Florence, , Italy
Monserrato, , Italy
Prato, , Italy
Reggio Emilia, , Italy
Roma, , Italy
Siena, , Italy
Kaunas, , Lithuania
Klaipėda, , Lithuania
Vilnius, , Lithuania
Bydgoszcz, , Poland
Krakow, , Poland
Krakow, , Poland
Lublin, , Poland
Lublin, , Poland
Poznan, , Poland
Torun, , Poland
Warsaw, , Poland
Warsaw, , Poland
Warsaw, , Poland
Wroclaw, , Poland
Kazan', , Russia
Moscow, , Russia
Moscow, , Russia
Voronezh, , Russia
Yaroslavl, , Russia
Košice, , Slovakia
Piešťany, , Slovakia
Cape Town, , South Africa
Cape Town, , South Africa
Cape Town, , South Africa
Durban, , South Africa
Pretoria, , South Africa
Pretoria, , South Africa
Pretoria, , South Africa
Stellenbosch, , South Africa
A Coruña, , Spain
Barcelona, , Spain
Córdoba, , Spain
Lugo, , Spain
Madrid, , Spain
Madrid, , Spain
Madrid, , Spain
Oviedo, , Spain
Oviedo, , Spain
Sabadell, , Spain
Basingstoke, , United Kingdom
Bath, , United Kingdom
Cannock, , United Kingdom
Greenock, , United Kingdom
Leeds, , United Kingdom
London, , United Kingdom
Salford, , United Kingdom
Stoke-on-Trent, , United Kingdom
Wigan, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Sieper J, Porter-Brown B, Thompson L, Harari O, Dougados M. Assessment of short-term symptomatic efficacy of tocilizumab in ankylosing spondylitis: results of randomised, placebo-controlled trials. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Jan;73(1):95-100. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203559. Epub 2013 Jun 13.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2009-017443-34
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
NA22823
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.