A Study of RoActemra/Actemra (Tocilizumab) in Patients With Ankylosing Spondylitis Who Have Failed Treatment With NSAIDs

NCT ID: NCT01209702

Last Updated: 2013-02-11

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

306 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-09-30

Study Completion Date

2011-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of RoActemra/Actemra (tocilizumab) in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) who have failed treatment with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and are naïve to tumor necrsos factor (TNF) antagonist therapy. In Part 1 of the study, patients will be randomized to receive either RoActemra/Actemra 8 mg/kg intravenously (IV) or placebo every 4 weeks for 12 weeks. In Part 2, patients will be randomized to receive RoActemra at either 8 mg/kg or 4 mg/kg IV or placebo every 4 weeks for 24 weeks. The double-blind treatment period will be followed by open-label treatment with RoActemra/Actemra 8 mg/kg iv every 4 weeks until Week 208 for all patients. Anticipated time on study treatment is 208 weeks.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study was planned as a Phase II/III seamless, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in patients with AS who were naïve to TNF antagonist therapy. The study consisted of 2 parts, each preceded by a screening visit and followed by a common open-label extension phase. Recruitment into Part 2 commenced after completion of enrollment for Part 1.

Part 1 was designed as a Phase II study exploring the efficacy and safety of tocilizumab therapy versus placebo. Part 1 was intended to determine whether Part 2 of the study would continue, based on a Week 12 analysis.

Part 2 was designed to provide pivotal Phase III efficacy and safety data for tocilizumab in patients with AS. Approximately 400 patients were to be enrolled. Once randomization into Part 1 was complete, randomization into Part 2 of the study was to be initiated.

Based on the results of the Week 12 Part 1 analyses of the primary endpoint (ASAS20) and secondary endpoints, and in consideration of all available safety data, a benefit/risk assessment was made and it was decided to halt the study because of lack of overall efficacy. Most patients did not complete the 24-week double-blind treatment period in Part 2.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Spondylitis, Ankylosing

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Part 1: Placebo

Participants received intravenous infusions of placebo once every 4 weeks until Week 12. Following the Week 12 visit, participants who completed Part 1 of the study received open-label 8 mg/kg tocilizumab through Week 208.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo to tocilizumab administered intravenously every 4 weeks

Part 1: Tocilizumab

Participants received intravenous infusions of 8 mg/kg tocilizumab once every 4 weeks until Week 12. Following the Week 12 visit, participants who completed Part 1 of the study received open-label 8 mg/kg tocilizumab through Week 208.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

tocilizumab

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Administered intravenously (iv) every 4 weeks

Part 2: Placebo

Participants received intravenous infusions of placebo once every 4 weeks until Week 24. Participants who did not attain an ASsessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis-20 (ASAS20) response at Week 16 were, at the investigator's discretion, eligible to receive open-label escape therapy consisting of 8 mg/kg tocilizumab. After Week 24, participants were to receive open-label treatment with 8 mg/kg tocilizumab every 4 weeks until Week 104. At the completion of Week 104, all Part 2 participants were to receive tocilizumab 8 mg/kg in the common open-label extension phase, however the study was terminated prior to any participants reaching this stage.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo to tocilizumab administered intravenously every 4 weeks

Part 2: Tocilizumab 4 mg/kg

Participants received intravenous infusions of 4 mg/kg tocilizumab once every 4 weeks until Week 24. Participants who did not attain an ASAS20 response at Week 16 were, at the investigator's discretion, eligible to receive open-label escape therapy consisting of 8 mg/kg tocilizumab. After Week 24, participants were to receive open-label treatment with 8 mg/kg tocilizumab every 4 weeks until Week 104. At the completion of Week 104, all Part 2 participants were to receive tocilizumab 8 mg/kg in the common open-label extension phase, however the study was terminated prior to any participants reaching this stage.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

tocilizumab

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Administered intravenously (iv) every 4 weeks

Part 2: Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg

Participants received intravenous infusions of 8 mg/kg tocilizumab once every 4 weeks until Week 24. Participants who did not attain an ASAS20 response at Week 16 were, at the investigator's discretion, eligible to receive open-label escape therapy consisting of 8 mg/kg tocilizumab. After Week 24, participants were to receive open-label treatment with 8 mg/kg tocilizumab every 4 weeks until Week 104. At the completion of Week 104, all Part 2 participants were to receive tocilizumab 8 mg/kg in the common open-label extension phase, however the study was terminated prior to any participants reaching this stage.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

tocilizumab

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Administered intravenously (iv) every 4 weeks

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

tocilizumab

Administered intravenously (iv) every 4 weeks

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Placebo

Placebo to tocilizumab administered intravenously every 4 weeks

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

RoActemra/Actemra

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult patients, ≥ 18 years of age
* Ankylosing Spondylitis as defined by the modified New York criteria for ≥ 3 months prior to baseline
* Active disease at screening and baseline (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index \[BASDAI\] ≥4.0, spinal pain visual analog scale \[VAS\] ≥40)
* Inadequate response or intolerant to 1 or more previous non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)
* Traditional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) must be withdrawn for at least 4 weeks prior to baseline (methotrexate, sulfasalazine and hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine may be allowed if at stable dose for at least 4 weeks prior to baseline)
* Oral corticosteroids (≥ 10 mg/day prednisone or equivalent) and NSAIDs/COX-2 inhibitors must be at stable dose for at least 4 weeks prior to baseline

Exclusion Criteria

* Major surgery (including joint surgery) within 8 weeks prior to screening or planned major surgery within 6 months after randomization
* Total ankylosis of spine (as determined by investigator)
* Inflammatory rheumatic disease other than ankylosing spondylitis
* Active, acute uveitis at baseline
* Treatment with tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonist therapy at any time prior to baseline
* Intra-articular or tendon injections or parenteral corticosteroids within 4 weeks prior to screening
* History of severe allergic or anaphylactic reactions to humanized or murine monoclonal antibodies
* Active current or history of recurrent bacterial, viral, fungal, mycobacterial or other infection
* History of or currently active primary or secondary immunodeficiency
* Body weight \> 150 kg
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hoffmann-La Roche

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Clinical Trials

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Hoffmann-La Roche

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Huntington Beach, California, United States

Site Status

Aventura, Florida, United States

Site Status

Orlando, Florida, United States

Site Status

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Decatur, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Marietta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Idaho Falls, Idaho, United States

Site Status

Wichita, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Cumberland, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Saint Claire Shores, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Greensboro, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Duncansville, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Hickory Grove, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Adelaide, , Australia

Site Status

Heidelberg, , Australia

Site Status

Hobart, , Australia

Site Status

Malvern East, , Australia

Site Status

Maroochydore, , Australia

Site Status

Sydney, , Australia

Site Status

Woodville, , Australia

Site Status

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Kortrijk, , Belgium

Site Status

Liège, , Belgium

Site Status

Yvoir, , Belgium

Site Status

Cuiabá, , Brazil

Site Status

Goiânia, , Brazil

Site Status

São Paulo, , Brazil

Site Status

São Paulo, , Brazil

Site Status

São Paulo, , Brazil

Site Status

Plovdiv, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Plovdiv, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Rousse, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Sevlievo, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Sofia, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Sofia, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Sofia, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Sofia, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Site Status

St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada

Site Status

Kitchener, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Mississauga, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Québec, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Sainte-Foy, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Trois-Rivières, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Bruntál, , Czechia

Site Status

Hlučín, , Czechia

Site Status

Olomouc, , Czechia

Site Status

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Praha 4 Nusle, , Czechia

Site Status

Sokolov, , Czechia

Site Status

Uherské Hradiště, , Czechia

Site Status

Zlín, , Czechia

Site Status

Besançon, , France

Site Status

Boulogne-Billancourt, , France

Site Status

Créteil, , France

Site Status

Grenoble, , France

Site Status

Montpellier, , France

Site Status

Paris, , France

Site Status

Strasbourg, , France

Site Status

Toulouse, , France

Site Status

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Cologne, , Germany

Site Status

Gommern, , Germany

Site Status

Hanover, , Germany

Site Status

Würzburg, , Germany

Site Status

Ahmedabad, , India

Site Status

Bangalore, , India

Site Status

Bangalore, , India

Site Status

Bangalore, , India

Site Status

Bangalore, , India

Site Status

Hyderabad, , India

Site Status

Jaipur, , India

Site Status

New Delhi, , India

Site Status

New Delhi, , India

Site Status

Secunderabad, , India

Site Status

Ferrara, , Italy

Site Status

Florence, , Italy

Site Status

Monserrato, , Italy

Site Status

Prato, , Italy

Site Status

Reggio Emilia, , Italy

Site Status

Roma, , Italy

Site Status

Siena, , Italy

Site Status

Kaunas, , Lithuania

Site Status

Klaipėda, , Lithuania

Site Status

Vilnius, , Lithuania

Site Status

Bydgoszcz, , Poland

Site Status

Krakow, , Poland

Site Status

Krakow, , Poland

Site Status

Lublin, , Poland

Site Status

Lublin, , Poland

Site Status

Poznan, , Poland

Site Status

Torun, , Poland

Site Status

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Wroclaw, , Poland

Site Status

Kazan', , Russia

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Voronezh, , Russia

Site Status

Yaroslavl, , Russia

Site Status

Košice, , Slovakia

Site Status

Piešťany, , Slovakia

Site Status

Cape Town, , South Africa

Site Status

Cape Town, , South Africa

Site Status

Cape Town, , South Africa

Site Status

Durban, , South Africa

Site Status

Pretoria, , South Africa

Site Status

Pretoria, , South Africa

Site Status

Pretoria, , South Africa

Site Status

Stellenbosch, , South Africa

Site Status

A Coruña, , Spain

Site Status

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Córdoba, , Spain

Site Status

Lugo, , Spain

Site Status

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Oviedo, , Spain

Site Status

Oviedo, , Spain

Site Status

Sabadell, , Spain

Site Status

Basingstoke, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Bath, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Cannock, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Greenock, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Leeds, , United Kingdom

Site Status

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Salford, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Stoke-on-Trent, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Wigan, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Australia Belgium Brazil Bulgaria Canada Czechia France Germany India Italy Lithuania Poland Russia Slovakia South Africa Spain United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Sieper J, Porter-Brown B, Thompson L, Harari O, Dougados M. Assessment of short-term symptomatic efficacy of tocilizumab in ankylosing spondylitis: results of randomised, placebo-controlled trials. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Jan;73(1):95-100. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203559. Epub 2013 Jun 13.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 23765873 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2009-017443-34

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

NA22823

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.