Effect of Colony Stimulating Factor on Poor Endometrial Development During IVF

NCT ID: NCT01202643

Last Updated: 2019-07-26

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE1/PHASE2

Total Enrollment

12 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-09-30

Study Completion Date

2013-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of G-CSF on endometrial thickness in women who have failed reaching minimal endometrial thickness by standard treatments, to assess how many reach embryo transfer and what implantation and pregnancy rates are in comparison to control patients. The study will be conducted in women undergoing transfer of previously cryopreserved embryos or undergoing transfer of embryos from donor eggs.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Objective: To investigate the effect of treatment with CSF : A placebo controlled double blinded crossover study.

Design: Crossover Randomized Control Trial

Setting: Academically affiliated private infertility centers

Subjects: Female IVF patients of all ages who are willing to be randomized to treatment and, in either IVF treatment, frozen embryo cycles (FET) or donor IVF cycles (D-IVF), 5 days before ET, have inadequate endometrial thickness.

Interventions: Subjects receive transvaginally, utilizing an insemination catheter, 2 slow intrauterine lavages with CSF-1 (Neupogen or generic, 300ug in 1 ml) 5 and 3 days, respectively, before embryo transfer and controls receive 1 ml of saline instead. Patients who do not become pregnant will after one month washout times continue treatment in the opposite study arm if they so choose and if they have remaining embryos.

Main Outcome Measures: Number of patients reaching embryo transfer with adequate endometrial thickness of at least 7mm.

Second Outcome Measures: Implantation and pregnancy rates..

Statistical and Power considerations: This is a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) with two study arms and panned crossover. Patients will be randomly assigned to Study group A or B according to a computer generated randomization table with 50:50 distributions. The study will test the null hypothesis that there is no difference in the transfer rates between the two groups. Transfer is only possible if the endometrial thickness reaches 7 mm or more. Order of treatment ab v ba will be added to the models as a separate factor and each phase will be analyzed as separate treatment strata.

The investigators are planning a study of independent cases and controls with 1 control per case. Prior data indicate that the transfer rate among controls is \< 1%. If the true transfer rate for experimental subjects is 25%, the investigators will need to study 38 experimental subjects and 38 control subjects to be able to reject the null hypothesis that the transfer rates for experimental and control subjects are equal with probability (power) 0.8. The Type I error probability associated with this test of this null hypothesis is 0.05. We will use a continuity-corrected chi-squared statistic or Fisher's exact test to evaluate this null hypothesis.

There will be a planned interim analysis after 20 participants have completed the trial and if significant effects are observed the trial may be terminated at that time. The power to detect a difference in this interim analysis is only 42.6%.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Infertility, Female

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

G-CSF

G-CSF 300 units administered by trans-cervical infusion one time on day of hCG trigger for Ovulation

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

G-CSF

Intervention Type DRUG

One infusion of G-CSF 300 units administered by intrauterine infusion

Saline

Saline administered by trans-cervical infusion one time on day of hCG trigger for ovulation

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Saline

Intervention Type DRUG

One intrauterine saline infusions of 1 cc

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

G-CSF

One infusion of G-CSF 300 units administered by intrauterine infusion

Intervention Type DRUG

Saline

One intrauterine saline infusions of 1 cc

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

NEUPOGEN (Filgrastim) Normal Saline (Salt water) 0.91% w/v of NaCl, about 300 mOsm/L

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patient's preparing for invitro fertilization and embryo transfer with endometrial growth of less than 7 mm, unresponsive to standard treatment

Exclusion Criteria

* Sickle Cell disease
* Renal insufficiency
* Upper respiratory infection or Pneumonia
* Chronic Neutropenia
* Known Past or present malignancy
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

45 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Foundation for Reproductive Medicine

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Center for Human Reproduction

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

David H. Barad

Director of Clinical Research

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

David H Barad, MD, MS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Center for Human Reproduction

Norbert Gleicher, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Center for Human Reproduction

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Center for Human Reproduction

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

09012010-01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Retrospective Database Studies
NCT01219296 COMPLETED
In Vitro Follicle Activation
NCT02496598 TERMINATED NA