Linking Altered Central Pain Processing and Genetic Polymorphism to Drug Efficacy in Chronic Low Back Pain (Predictio)

NCT ID: NCT01179828

Last Updated: 2016-04-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

150 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-07-31

Study Completion Date

2015-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Drug therapy in patients with chronic low back pain is a major challenge for physicians. One of the problems is the lacking knowledge in prediction of drug efficacy in a chosen patient. Usually one of the classes of pain medication is given to patients with a similar clinical picture, although different pain mechanisms may be responsible for this clinical picture.

Another reason for variable drug efficacy are genetic polymorphisms, this may be the reason why an unique drug produces different responses (from a lacking analgesic effect up to excessive effect or side-effects.

Quantitative sensory testing is a method that documents alterations in the pain perception system. Linking genetic polymorphisms to quantitative sensory testing may give us a tool for anticipation of drug efficacy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background

Drug therapy is an essential part of pain treatment. However, only a minor part of pain patients benefits from the available treatments or is able to tolerate the drugs. One important limitation of drug therapy is lack of instruments to predict their effect. Indeed, in clinical practice "classes" of drugs (e.g. antidepressants) are given to "classes" of patients (e.g. neuropathic pain patients). However, within those classes of patients very different pain mechanisms are likely to underlie the pain condition in different patients. If drugs affect part of these mechanisms, they will not work in all patients. Another reason for variability in drug responses is genetic variation leading to a spectrum of different responses to analgesics, from lack of efficacy to exaggerated responses, up to intolerable adverse effects.

Quantitative sensory testing comprises methods that document alterations and reorganization of the nociceptive system. Measuring an abnormal result in a chronic pain patient may provide us with the information that the underlying pain pathways somehow must be altered. An essential question is whether this information can be linked to drug efficacy in a mechanism-based treatment approach. A further important question is whether assessing genetic polymorphisms can explain different drug effects and hence help selecting the appropriate therapeutic strategy for individual patients.

Objective

We will test the hypothesis that there is a correlation between disturbances in specific pain mechanisms as assessed by quantitative sensory tests and analgesic efficacy after single-dose drug administration in patients with chronic low back pain. Genetic factors affecting drug metabolism and pain sensitivity will be analyzed as additional explanatory variables for drug efficacy.

Methods

Quantitative sensory testing: Heat pain threshold and tolerance, Ice water testing with central modulation of nociceptive input (DNIC), electrical pain detection and temporal summation (skin probe), pressure algometry with pain detection and threshold Drugs investigated: Imipramine, Oxycodone, Clobazam Blood samples: pharmacogenetics: Cytochrome variants CYP2D6, CYP2C19, CYP3A4, COMT haplotypes, CGH-1 variants, A118G of mu opioid receptor gene variants pharmacokinetics: kinetics of imipramine and desipramine

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Low Back Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

Oxycodone 15mg

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Oxycodone 15mg

Intervention Type DRUG

15mg single administration p.o.

2

Clobazam 20mg

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Clobazam

Intervention Type DRUG

20mg single administration p.o.

3

Imipramine 75mg

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Imipramine

Intervention Type DRUG

75mg single administration p.o.

4

Tolterodine 1mg

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Tolterodine

Intervention Type DRUG

1 mg single administration p.o.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Oxycodone 15mg

15mg single administration p.o.

Intervention Type DRUG

Clobazam

20mg single administration p.o.

Intervention Type DRUG

Imipramine

75mg single administration p.o.

Intervention Type DRUG

Tolterodine

1 mg single administration p.o.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Low back pain with NRS\>2
* Chronic low back pain since more than 6 months

Exclusion Criteria

* pregnancy
* use of pain medication other than paracetamol and ibuprofen in the last 7 days
* suspicion of radicular pain
* suspicion of intervertebral disk herniation
* foraminal intervertebral stenosis
* suspicion of polyneuropathy
* diabetes
* parkinson disease
* alzheimer disease
* glaucoma
* prostata hyperplasia or voiding problems
* known heart rhythm problems
* heart insufficiency NYHA 3-4
* Systemic inflammatory disease
* Ongoing oncologic disease
* drug or alcohol abuse
* Significant depressive disease (BDI-FS\>9)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Bern

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Zurich

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Aalborg University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Inselspital Bern

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Michele Curatolo, Prof

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

University Hospital Bern, Switzerland

Andreas Siegenthaler, Dr Med

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

University Hospital Bern, Switzerland

Pascal H Vuilleumier, Dr Med

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Hospital Bern, Switzerland

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Andreas Siegenthaler

Dep. of Anesthesiolgy and Pain Therapy, Bern University Hospital, Switzerland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Switzerland

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Saarto T, Wiffen PJ. Antidepressants for neuropathic pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Oct 17;2007(4):CD005454. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005454.pub2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17943857 (View on PubMed)

Arendt-Nielsen L, Yarnitsky D. Experimental and clinical applications of quantitative sensory testing applied to skin, muscles and viscera. J Pain. 2009 Jun;10(6):556-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2009.02.002. Epub 2009 Apr 19.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 19380256 (View on PubMed)

Foulkes T, Wood JN. Pain genes. PLoS Genet. 2008 Jul 25;4(7):e1000086. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000086.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 18654615 (View on PubMed)

Curatolo M, Arendt-Nielsen L, Petersen-Felix S. Central hypersensitivity in chronic pain: mechanisms and clinical implications. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2006 May;17(2):287-302. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2005.12.010.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 16616268 (View on PubMed)

Markenson JA, Croft J, Zhang PG, Richards P. Treatment of persistent pain associated with osteoarthritis with controlled-release oxycodone tablets in a randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin J Pain. 2005 Nov-Dec;21(6):524-35. doi: 10.1097/01.ajp.0000146215.86038.38.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 16215338 (View on PubMed)

Schliessbach J, Siegenthaler A, Butikofer L, Vuilleumier P, Juni P, Arendt-Nielsen L, Curatolo M. Quantitative sensory tests fairly reflect immediate effects of oxycodone in chronic low-back pain. Scand J Pain. 2017 Oct;17:107-115. doi: 10.1016/j.sjpain.2017.07.004. Epub 2017 Aug 9.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28850362 (View on PubMed)

Siegenthaler A, Schliessbach J, Vuilleumier PH, Juni P, Zeilhofer HU, Arendt-Nielsen L, Curatolo M. Linking altered central pain processing and genetic polymorphism to drug efficacy in chronic low back pain. BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2015 Sep 16;16:23. doi: 10.1186/s40360-015-0023-z.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 26376691 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

grant: SPUM no. 33CM30_124117

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

KEK 213/09

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Traditional Medicine Use in Low Back Pain
NCT06627101 NOT_YET_RECRUITING