Identifying an Ideal Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test Parameter
NCT ID: NCT01162083
Last Updated: 2016-02-17
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
100 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2010-10-31
2013-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
A patient's peak oxygen consumption, the maximum amount of oxygen taken up by the blood from the lungs when breathing increases during exercise, is the main measurement taken from CPET. It is low in heart disease and has been used to predict the risk of death and therefore plan treatments for patients. However this is also low in numerous other diseases including lung disease; reduced oxygen consumption in patients with two conditions may be wrongly thought to be because of the heart leading to inappropriate action and distress to the patient.
Newer measurements of exercise capacity from the same exercise test are better at predicting death in heart failure.
We propose that they are more specific for heart failure over other diseases, for example lung disease, when compared with peak oxygen consumption, and are superior when a single best test for heart failure is required.
This research aims to identify which measurement of exercise capacity is most specific for heart failure. We will perform the test on many patients with different diseases, and before and after procedures such as the implantation of special pacemakers, and heart valve operations. This should lead to a more accepted use of this investigation and the more appropriate identification of which patient should have which procedure.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Test-Retest Reliability of Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing With Echocardiography
NCT07281534
Optimized Peak VO2 in Predicting Advanced HF
NCT05212649
Comparison of Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy (CRT) Response Using High Frequency (HF) - ECG or Q-LV Guided Optimisation for Left Ventricular, Pacing Site.
NCT05829876
Exercise Oxygen Kinetic and Cardiac Output in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
NCT05754489
Usefulness of Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing for Cardiovascular Risk Estimation and Frailty Assessment in Liver Transplant Candidates
NCT04543825
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The leading parameter from a CPET, peak VO2, has for many years been the single value used to guide management of patients following a diagnosis of many diseases from the heart and lungs. Newer measures predict outcome from heart failure (our principal area of interest) better. We believe this may be because they are less affected by lung disease than peak VO2 and we know that many patients have both heart and lung diseases.
By showing the best CPET variable for each individual disease state, we will be able to ensure patients are correctly put into a level of risk for their condition and that they will be followed-up with the most accurate marker from exercise testing, rather than a "one size fits all" approach of peak VO2.
With regards to heart valve disease, standard exercise testing just using ECG leads, rather than cardiopulmonary exercise testing, is starting to be used more in identifying patients without symptoms for possible surgery. The inaccuracy of this test will inevitably lead to patients being wrongly categorised. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing is a much more accurate way of establishing the impact of any disease on the heart or lung over traditional exercise testing and therefore we believe that evidence of its role around the time of surgery could be used as further support for its role in improving decision making for patient.
Ultimately the greater knowledge of this test and when we should use it will help patients with very common heart conditions to be treated appropriately, potentially helping many patients.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Mitral Valve disease
Patients with mitral valve disease, deemed suitable and ready for elective valve repair or replacement. No significant arrhythmias, other valvular disease or LV dysfunction present. We shall also be recruiting patients undergoing a Mitraclip procedure.
No interventions assigned to this group
COPD
Patients with isolated chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and no cardiac disease.
No interventions assigned to this group
Mixed Lesions
Patients with proven limitation from both cardiac and respiratory disease.
No interventions assigned to this group
CRT
Patients with symptomatic heart failure who have responded to cardiac resynchronisation therapy (biventricular pacemaker).
No interventions assigned to this group
Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure of primarily myopathic origin, without rhythm disturbance, ongoing ischaemia or significant valvular disease.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Able to perform cycle ergometry and agree to perform between 2 and 3 tests.
3. If previously undergone echocardiography there is evidence of reasonable echo windows (good views).
4. Agree to the full study protocol.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Symptomatic coronary disease, or significant ischaemia noted on cardiopulmonary exercise test (unless accounted for by aortic valve disease, in which case a prior coronary angiogram would have been undertaken if significant coronary disease then they will not be invited to participate).
3. Anaemia (Hb \<12 in men, \<11 in women).
4. Obesity (BMI \>30) which could lead to limitation independent of the cardiovascular or respiratory condition.
5. Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 3 or above (estimated GFR \<60ml/hr as calculated by Cockcroft Gault equation). The metabolic acidosis associated with this condition will affect ventilatory equivalents.
6. Poor echocardiographic windows so that a full data set is not achievable.
7. Inability to perform a symptom limited cardiopulmonary exercise test.
8. Inability to perform spirometry.
9. Inability to consent/make decisions (lack of competence)
10. Vulnerable adult/current detainee in prison/elsewhere.
11. Significant neurological or musculoskeletal abnormalities.
12. Inability to complete all the investigations at the time intervals agreed in the protocol.
13. Permanent Pacemaker unless in the biventricular pacemaker group in the Interventional Study. These patients in this group will be excluded if they are pacing dependent (when the biventricular function is disabled they do not have a normal intrinsic rhythm) and if they have significant first degree AV block at rest or on exercise (will activate right ventricular pacing after a sinus beat).
14. Patients in the atrial fibrillation interventional group will be excluded if they revert back to atrial fibrillation after the procedure, or the procedure never restores sinus rhythm. These patients will still be eligible for inclusion in the observational study.
15. Recent (recovery within \<1month) decompensation of their underlying cardiac or respiratory disorder.
16. Uncontrolled hypertension.
17. Untreated life threatening arrhythmia.
18. Recent surgery (within 10 weeks).
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
OTHER
British Heart Foundation
OTHER
Imperial College London
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Roland Wensel, MD PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Imperial College London
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
London, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Barron A, Francis DP, Mayet J, Ewert R, Obst A, Mason M, Elkin S, Hughes AD, Wensel R. Oxygen Uptake Efficiency Slope and Breathing Reserve, Not Anaerobic Threshold, Discriminate Between Patients With Cardiovascular Disease Over Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. JACC Heart Fail. 2016 Apr;4(4):252-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2015.11.003. Epub 2016 Feb 10.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CRO1570
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.