Validity of SeismoFit VO2max Estimation in Patients With Heart Failure or Ischemic Heart Disease
NCT ID: NCT05520307
Last Updated: 2024-01-17
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
180 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2023-12-16
2024-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The aim of this study is therefore to investigate the validity of the SeismoFit VO2max estimation in patients with heart failure (HF) or ischemic heart disease (IHD).
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of a Non-invasive Cardiac Output Monitoring System.
NCT03178097
The Consistency of Cardiac Output Measurements by Different Methods in VA-ECMO Patients
NCT04102072
Measurement of Pulmonary Transit Time by Echocardiography: Comparison With Cardiac MRI
NCT02088320
Evaluation of Clinical Efficacy and Prognosis in Patients with Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy Through Hemodynamic Modeling Reconstructed by CT
NCT06683872
Mechanisms of Right Ventricular Adaptation in Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
NCT04154657
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
1\) A cross-sectional part: 80 patients with HF and 60 patients with IHD are recruited for this part. An interim data analysis is planed after 50% of the patients have been through testing, in order to allow for algorithm adjustment, before the data analysis of the last 50% are performed. This part requires one test day.
2\) A longitudinal part: 60 patients with HF and 40 patients with IHD are recruited to perform a follow-up test (from part 1) after being medical customized to the treatment doses. This is typically within 3-4 month, depending on the patient.
This part requires one follow-up test day in addition to the test in part 1.
3\) A test-retest part: 20 HF and 20 IHD patients are recruited for this part. This part requires one test day within 2-7 days after the last test in part 2.
The testing procedures are identical for the different study parts and includes:
* Measurement of weight and height.
* Estimation of VO2max with the SeismoFit device at supine rest. The SeismoFit device is patented by the company VentriJect Aps and it contains a three-axis accelerometer and a 3-v battery. The SeismoFit is attached to the lower part of the sternum with double adhesive tape. The SCG recording takes 40 seconds and signal process takes approximately one to two minutes depending on the internet connection. The algorithm uses SCG information and weight, height, age and sex.
* A direct measurement of VO2max applying a graded exercise test until voluntary exhaustion with continuous pulmonary gas exchange measurements. The protocol will be customized for the different patients. However, a starting workload of 50 Watt with 25 Watt increments every 2 minutes are the standard protocol used. The patients will be monitored with ECG and blood pressure measurements during the test. Directly following termination of the test, the patients will rate their perceived exertion on the Borg 6-20 scale.
Data from echocardiography measurement and blood samples performed during the standard care treatment at the hospital will be available in this study.
Statistical analysis:
All data will be checked for normal distribution (Shapiro-Wilk test) and equal variance (Brown-Forsythe test). The significant level is p\<0.05.
Validity assessment of the SeismoFit VO2max estimation compared with the CPET measured VO2max for HF and IHD patients will be analysed with; A Student's paired t-test or a mixed effect model (part 2), Pearson correlation coefficient r, Standard Error of Estimate (SEE), Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE), Coefficient of Variation (CV%) and Bland-Altman analysis with 95% limits of agreement (BA-plot). Pearson r interpretation is: very high \> 0.90, high 0.70-0.90, moderate 0.50-0.70, low 0.30-0.50 and little if any 0.00-0.30. SEE is calculated using: =√(Y-Y')/n-2, with Y representing CPET VO2max and Y' representing SeismoFit VO2max. SEE interpretation is: very good \< 4.0 ml/min/kg, good 4.0-6.0 ml/min/kg, fair 6.0-8.0 ml/min/kg, poor 8.0-10.0 ml/min/kg and \> 10.0 ml/min/kg very poor. A MAPE ≤ 10% will be used as a criteria level for the SeismoFit VO2max estimation to be considered clinically relevant.
Reliability assessment is analysed with a mixed-effect model, within-subject standard deviation, CV% and Pearson r. The within-subject standard deviation is calculated taking the squared root of the within-subject variance. Statistical analyses will be performed, and figures constructed in R Studio, GraphPad Prism and Microsoft Excel.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
HF
Patients with heart failure.
No interventions assigned to this group
IHD
Patients with ischemic heart disease.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Approved for exercise testing on a cycle ergometer by a specialized doctor in cardiology.
Exclusion Criteria
* Conditions that prevent maximal exercise testing assess by a specialized doctor in cardiology.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Herlev and Gentofte Hospital
OTHER
VentriJect ApS
INDUSTRY
University of Copenhagen
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jørn Wulff Helge
Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jørn W Helge, Professor
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Herlev and Gentofte Hospital
Gentofte Municipality, , Denmark
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
VentriJect Gentofte Study
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.