Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
204 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2007-02-28
2010-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Role of Patient Expectations in Traumatic Orthopedic Outcomes-TEFTOM EURASIA
NCT01134354
Use of Weightbearing Radiographs to Determine Treatment of bi- and Trimalleolar Ankle Fractures
NCT05765929
Predictive Factors for Failure of Internal Fixations of Lower Limb Fractures
NCT03091114
Ankle Fracture vs Ankle Fracture-Dislocation
NCT02198768
The Evaluation of the Lower Limb Function After Femur Fracture's Operation Treatment
NCT04062604
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
1. To develop a novel, psychometrically sound, trauma patient expectation instrument that: a) demonstrates content validity; b) considers patient and surgeon expectations; c) predicts orthopedic outcomes; d) is reliable; e) is patient friendly; and f) is easy to score and interpret. This will be known as the Trauma Expectation Factor (TEF).
2. To develop a novel, psychometrically sound, trauma patient outcomes instrument that: a) demonstrates content validity; b) measures current condition in the same domains as the expectation instrument; c) demonstrates construct validity; d) demonstrates criterion validity; e) is reliable; f) is patient friendly; and g) is easy to score and interpret. This will be known as the Trauma Outcomes Measure (TOM).
Hypotheses:
H#1. A simple pre-surgical questionnaire that measures patient expectations (i.e., Trauma Expectation Factor) after an ankle fracture requiring surgery will predict an "expected" score on a standardized disease-specific ankle instrument (i.e., AAOS Foot and Ankle Core Score).
H#2. A similar instrument that is reworded to assess current condition (i.e., Trauma Outcomes Measure) instead of expectations, is a valid, reliable, and responsive measure of a traumatic patient's condition.
H#3. Patient and surgeon expectations of final outcome status are different; however, the differences get smaller over time.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Ankle / dist. tibia fracture fixation
ankle or distal tibia surgery
internal fixation for ankle or distal tibia fracture
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
ankle or distal tibia surgery
internal fixation for ankle or distal tibia fracture
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Scheduled for and undergoing surgery for their fracture
* 18 years of age or older
Exclusion Criteria
* Subject has disease entity, or condition that precludes likelihood of bony union (eg, metastatic cancer, metabolic bone disease)
* Subject has severe dementia or other severe mental health problem that may preclude him/her from completing study questionnaires
* Subject is participating in other competing clinical research that may interfere with participation in this research
* Subject is unlikely to attend study related follow-up visits
* Subject has polytrauma (more than one organ system compromised)
* Subject has fracture(s) other than ankle fracture
* Subject is a prisoner
* Fracture occurred more than 4 weeks ago
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
AO Clinical Investigation and Publishing Documentation
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Michael Suk, Professor
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Orthopaedic Trauma Service, Universitiy of Florida - Shands Jacksonville
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Orthopedic Trauma Service, University of Florida - Shands Jacksonville
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York
New York, New York, United States
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York
New York, New York, United States
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Ribeirao Preto Medical School - University of Sao Paulo
Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil
Department of Orthopaedic Trauma, Foothills Medical Center, Calgary
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
TEFTOM
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.