Continuous Hemodialysis With an Enhanced Middle Molecule Clearance Membrane

NCT ID: NCT01067313

Last Updated: 2011-03-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2/PHASE3

Total Enrollment

24 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-07-31

Study Completion Date

2011-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study aims to demonstrate equivalence in terms of molecule removal between continuous hemodialysis using an "enhanced middle molecule clearance" membrane(Ultraflux EMiC2) and continuous hemofiltration using a standard membrane (Ultraflux AV1000S) in ICU patients requiring continuous renal replacement therapy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In sepsis, the removal of middle molecular weight molecules such as cytokines (also called blood purification), has shown a great interest in intensive care during the last decades. Indeed, these cytokines are involved in the development of the multi-organ failure syndrome when patients are in septic shock. There is some evidence to suggest that extracorporeal therapies (hemofiltration-hemodialysis)are interesting tools to modulate the inflammatory response and to restore the immune homeostasis.

However, hemodialysis using "conventional" membranes does not allow the removal of middle molecules. Conversely, high-volume hemofiltration is an appropriate therapy but it has a lot of drawbacks due to the high ultrafiltration rates (removal of beneficial small molecules, technical and economical issues due to the use of large amounts of fluid replacement). Finally, high cut-off hemofiltration has been reported to be associated with significant albumin loss.

Therefore, continuous "enhanced middle molecule clearance" hemodialysis could be an interesting alternative, making possible the removal of these middle molecules without significant albumin loss and with some theoretical advantages (reduced cost due to the possibility to produce the dialysate from a water circuit, decreased nursing workload).

The aim of this study is to assess the clearances of different kind of molecules (small, middle and large) when continuous enhanced middle molecule clearance hemodialysis is applied to septic patients.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Septic Shock

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Dialyzer Ultraflux EMiC2

Dialyzer Ultraflux EMiC2 used in Continuous Hemodialysis

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Dialyzer Ultraflux EMiC2

Intervention Type DEVICE

Dialysate flow rate = 40 ml/kg/h The treatment duration may be variable depending on modifications in patient health status, but will not exceed 3 sessions of 48 hours each.

Dialyzer Ultraflux AV1000S

Dialyzer Ultraflux AV1000S used in continuous Hemofiltration

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Dialyzer Ultraflux AV1000S

Intervention Type DEVICE

Ultrafiltration flow rate = 40 ml/kg/h The blood flow rate will be adjusted to obtain a filtration fraction of 20%. Reinjection = 100% postdilution. The treatment duration may be variable depending on modifications in patient health status, but will not exceed 3 sessions of 48 hours each.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Dialyzer Ultraflux EMiC2

Dialysate flow rate = 40 ml/kg/h The treatment duration may be variable depending on modifications in patient health status, but will not exceed 3 sessions of 48 hours each.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Dialyzer Ultraflux AV1000S

Ultrafiltration flow rate = 40 ml/kg/h The blood flow rate will be adjusted to obtain a filtration fraction of 20%. Reinjection = 100% postdilution. The treatment duration may be variable depending on modifications in patient health status, but will not exceed 3 sessions of 48 hours each.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Male or female aged over 18 years.
* ICU patients with septic shock and AKI requiring continuous renal replacement.
* Patient able to agree to be enrolled in the study with informed consent. If the patient can not provide consent, only the consent of family members will be sought if they are present and, to default, the opinion of trustworthy person under article L.1111-6 of the French Health Code. If there is no family present, or trustworthy person designated, the subject will not be included in the study.

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnancy or lactation.
* Participation in another research protocol.
* People particularly vulnerable as defined in Articles L.1121-5, L.1121-6, L.1121-7, L.1121-8 et L.1122-1-2 of the French Health Code.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hospices Civils de Lyon

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Fresenius Medical Care France

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Bernard Allaouchiche, Professor

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hospices Civils de Lyon

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Edouard Herriot Hospital, P Reanimation

Lyon, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

HD-RE-01-F

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.