MCO Membrane Efficiency in Septic Shock Patients

NCT ID: NCT04834921

Last Updated: 2021-04-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-12-31

Study Completion Date

2021-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a monocentre randomized pilot study. All patients received two consecutive RRT: CVVHD with MCO filter (Ultraflux® EMiC®2) and post-Continuous Veno-Venous Hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) with HFF(AV1000S®) in a controlled randomized (1:1) blinded manner. Crossover randomized to sequence (A+B or B+A) for 48 h total without washout.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a monocentre randomized pilot study. All patients received CVVHD with MCO filter (Ultraflux® EMiC®2) and post-Continuous Veno-Venous Hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) with HFF(AV1000S®) in a controlled randomized (1:1) blinded manner. Crossover randomized to sequence (A+B or B+A) for 48 h total without washout.

The efficiency of the filters for small and middle molecules was compared in septic shock patients with AKI stage 3.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Septic Shock Acute Kidney Injury

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

All patients received two consecutive RRT (MCO-CVVHD and HFF-CVVHDF); in a controlled randomized (1:1) blinded manner. Each RRT treatment lasted 24 hours Crossover randomized to sequence (A+B or B+A) for 48 h total without washout
Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Investigators
Blinding procedure was limited to the doctors who collected the data and the external statistician who performed the analysis

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

MCO-CVVHD

CVVHD with MCO filter for 24 hours

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Ultraflux® EMiC®2

Intervention Type DEVICE

Ultraflux® EMiC®2-CVVHD runs in septic shock patients with AKI KDIGO 3 for 24 hours. and patients were randomised to start Ultraflux® EMiC®2-CVVHD in the first day or in the second day from the RRT start; more precisely, crossover randomized to sequence consists in Ultraflux® EMiC®2-CVVHD (first day)+ HFF-CVVHDF(second day) and HFF-CVVHDF (first day) + Ultraflux® EMiC®2-CVVHD (second day) for 48 h total without washout

HFF-CVVHDF

CVVHDF with high flux filter for 24 hours

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Ultraflux® EMiC®2

Intervention Type DEVICE

Ultraflux® EMiC®2-CVVHD runs in septic shock patients with AKI KDIGO 3 for 24 hours. and patients were randomised to start Ultraflux® EMiC®2-CVVHD in the first day or in the second day from the RRT start; more precisely, crossover randomized to sequence consists in Ultraflux® EMiC®2-CVVHD (first day)+ HFF-CVVHDF(second day) and HFF-CVVHDF (first day) + Ultraflux® EMiC®2-CVVHD (second day) for 48 h total without washout

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ultraflux® EMiC®2

Ultraflux® EMiC®2-CVVHD runs in septic shock patients with AKI KDIGO 3 for 24 hours. and patients were randomised to start Ultraflux® EMiC®2-CVVHD in the first day or in the second day from the RRT start; more precisely, crossover randomized to sequence consists in Ultraflux® EMiC®2-CVVHD (first day)+ HFF-CVVHDF(second day) and HFF-CVVHDF (first day) + Ultraflux® EMiC®2-CVVHD (second day) for 48 h total without washout

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

HFF-CVVHDF

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age \> 18 years;
* septic shock according to ACCP/SCCM criteria
* AKI KDIGO stage 3
* clinical decision to begin citrate based-RRT for at least 48 hours
* Hb \>= 9 g/dL
* Obtain the informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Pre-existing chronic renal insufficiency
* Weight \> 125 kg Life expectancy \<24 hr
* Declared do Not Resuscitate or Comfort Measures
* Platelets \< 20 \[10\^3/ul\] or active bleeding
* Pregnancy
* Contraindication to citrate
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

International Renal Research Institute Vicenza

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Giessen

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Fiorenza Ferrari

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Fiorenza Ferrari

Senior Consultant at intensive Care Unit of Hospital San Matteo, Pavoa, Italy

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Fiorenza Ferrari

Pavia, PV, Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

46/15A

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.