Virtual Reality Based Testing of Power Wheelchair Driving Skills
NCT ID: NCT00951509
Last Updated: 2015-08-24
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
31 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2011-08-31
2013-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Specific Aim 1: To develop computer-based and VR-based wheelchair driving assessments for both drivers and non-drivers that correspond to an accepted real-world driving assessment (Power Mobility Road Test) and compare them to the real-world assessment and to each other.
Specific Aim 2: To develop additional features of the computer-based and VR-based assessments that present dynamic tasks and determine whether skills on these tasks can be delineated within the virtual environment.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Virtual Reality for Power Wheelchair Training
NCT03562455
Virtual Peer Coaching in Manual Wheelchair Skills
NCT06295146
Remote Wheelchair Skills Training Efficacy
NCT03499951
Comparison of Power Wheelchair Driving Performance Under Immersive and Non-immersive Conditions With Drivers With Neurological Disorders
NCT04894981
Evaluation of Electric Wheelchair Driving Performance in Simulator Compared to Driving in Real-life Situations
NCT04171973
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Phase II: Research Protocol:
Experimental Set-up:
VRSIM consisted of two display options, three 6' X 8' back projected screens (field of view 160°) (VR screens) and a single 22" desktop monitor (field of view 90°) (PC screens), both with the first-person perspective viewpoint (Fig.1). The virtual environment consisted of a simulation of an indoor office space with a kitchen; a lounge area and set of hallways lined by offices, and incorporated the tasks of the PMRT (Fig.2). Participants interacted with VRSIM either using dual rollers that interfaced with drive wheels of the wheelchair ('Rollers ON' driving mode) or using an instrumented wheelchair joystick through a custom software ('Rollers OFF' driving mode). The custom software uses a proportional derivative mathematical model to simulate the real-world motion of the EPW within the virtual environment. VRSIM was designed with two display options and two user input modalities to assess the feasibility of using such a system with different interfaces in different settings, such as in a busy wheelchair clinic (using the much immersive VR screens with rollers) or in a user's home (with the user's personal computer and the customized joystick).
The "actor/driver" in the VRSIM was a virtual model of a person sitting in a standard commercially available EPW power wheelchair (width 0.671 m, length 0.701 m). A horizontal slider bar that indicated the real time location of the virtual wheelchair with respect to virtual obstacles was added to this version (Fig.1, 2). This helped display warnings when the chair was too close to obstacles, especially when the obstacles were behind the driver. Participants were expected to drive along the course indicated by arrows touching or passing through preset milestone markers signified by semi-transparent balloons. These sequentially displayed milestones defined the tasks of the virtual PMRT. Participants were instructed to complete every task as quickly and accurately as possible. An equivalent PMRT driving course was charted out in an office space for the real world driving evaluation.
Data collection:
After informed consent, participants performed up to 2 practice sessions within the virtual driving course. Participants reported their level of comfort and sense of being in control in the VRSIM during practice based on which a value between 1.0 and 4.0 was selected for the linear and angular speed gains in VRSIM. In addition, participants were asked to select a different pre-programmed driving profile on their wheelchairs (e.g. "indoor" profile), which was similar to their everyday driving profile to obtain optimum driving speed. Optional breaks for 5-10 minutes were provided between driving sessions. For both the PC and VR screens, participants drove through the complete driving course: two trials with the Rollers ON driving mode, one trial with the Rollers OFF driving mode, and one trial in the real-world PMRT driving course constituted to a total of 5 driving conditions (Table 1). A balanced randomization scheme was used to set the order of the five driving conditions.
From a group of 6 clinicians comprised of 1 occupational therapist, 3 physical therapists, and 2 physicians, 2 clinicians were randomly assigned as the evaluation team for each participant. The team always had 1 certified Assistive Technology Professional with more than 5 years of experience in power wheelchair driving evaluations. The assigned clinicians independently scored every PMRT task during all the driving trials using the following criteria: 4: completed independently, 3: completed hesitantly requiring several trials and minor accidents, 2: commits serious accidents that may cause harm to driver or other people, 1: unable to complete a task. Each clinician had a separate PMRT scoring sheet for each trial.
Repeat Testing:
Subjects underwent all five testing scenarios twice, returning on a second visit in no earlier than 2 weeks.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Condition 1 (PC Screens with No Rollers)
All subjects (Repeated - measures study design): All subjects were evaluated with the Power Mobility Road Test (PMRT).
Power Mobility Road Test (PMRT)
All subjects will underwent the Power Mobility Road Test (PMRT), and the clinicians scored the driving performance within each condition.
Condition 2 (PC Screens with Rollers)
All subjects (Repeated - measures study design): All subjects were evaluated with the Power Mobility Road Test (PMRT).
Power Mobility Road Test (PMRT)
All subjects will underwent the Power Mobility Road Test (PMRT), and the clinicians scored the driving performance within each condition.
Condition 3 (VR Screens with No Rollers)
All subjects (Repeated - measures study design): All subjects were evaluated with the Power Mobility Road Test (PMRT).
Power Mobility Road Test (PMRT)
All subjects will underwent the Power Mobility Road Test (PMRT), and the clinicians scored the driving performance within each condition.
Condition 4 (VR Screens with Rollers)
All subjects (Repeated - measures study design): All subjects were evaluated with the Power Mobility Road Test (PMRT).
Power Mobility Road Test (PMRT)
All subjects will underwent the Power Mobility Road Test (PMRT), and the clinicians scored the driving performance within each condition.
Condntion 5 (Real-world driving)
All subjects (Repeated - measures study design): All subjects were evaluated with the Power Mobility Road Test (PMRT).
Power Mobility Road Test (PMRT)
All subjects will underwent the Power Mobility Road Test (PMRT), and the clinicians scored the driving performance within each condition.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Power Mobility Road Test (PMRT)
All subjects will underwent the Power Mobility Road Test (PMRT), and the clinicians scored the driving performance within each condition.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Subjects must have a diagnosis of SCI, spina bifida, syringomyelia, spinal stenosis, transverse myelitis, ALS, spinal cord disease, multiple sclerosis, stroke, polytraumatic injury, or TBI with residual motor, sensory, or cognitive impairments that impair mobility.
* Subjects must use a power wheelchair or an attendant propelled manual wheelchair for all or part of their mobility.
* Subjects must be able to provide informed consent.
* Subjects must have very basic cognitive, visual, and motor skills to interact with an interface.
Exclusion Criteria
* Subjects with a history of seizures in the last 90 days. (A computer screen task has the potential to induce seizures).
* Subjects who do not pass the screening protocol.
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
US Department of Veterans Affairs
FED
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Rory A. Cooper, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Director, Center of Excellence for Wheelchairs and Related Technology
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
VA Pittsburgh Health Care System
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
02691
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
A6035-R
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.